| Message ID | 20231017201425.98668-1-vineetg@rivosinc.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [COMMITTED] RISC-V/testsuite/pr111466.c: update test and expected output | expand |
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c index 007792466a51..3348d593813d 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ /* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zba_zbs -mabi=lp64" } */ /* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" } } */ -int foo2(int unused, int n, unsigned y, unsigned delta){ +unsigned int foo2(int unused, int n, unsigned y, unsigned delta){ int s = 0; unsigned int x = 0; for (;x<n;x +=delta) @@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ int foo2(int unused, int n, unsigned y, unsigned delta){ return s; } -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\msext\M" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "\msext\M" } } */
Update the test to potentially generate two SEXT.W instructions: one for incoming function arg, other for function return. But after commit 8eb9cdd14218 ("expr: don't clear SUBREG_PROMOTED_VAR_P flag for a promoted subreg") the test is not supposed to generate either of them so fix the expected assembler output which was errorneously introduced by commit above. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c (foo2): Change return to unsigned int as that will potentially generate two SEXT.W instructions. dg-final: Change to scan-assembler-not SEXT.W. Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr111466.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)