Message ID | 20230725063910.1568-1-jinma@linux.alibaba.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: Fixbug for fsflags instruction error using immediate. | expand |
Hi Jin, this looks reasonable. Would you mind adding (small) test cases still to make sure we don't accidentally reintroduce the problem? Regards Robin
> Hi Jin, > > this looks reasonable. Would you mind adding (small) test cases > still to make sure we don't accidentally reintroduce the problem? > > Regards > Robin Ok, I have already sent the v2 version, please review it again, thanks. Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625390.html
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md index 4615e811947..1ec85e30d7e 100644 --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.md @@ -3074,7 +3074,7 @@ (define_insn "riscv_frcsr" "frcsr\t%0") (define_insn "riscv_fscsr" - [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:SI 0 "csr_operand" "rK")] UNSPECV_FSCSR)] + [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:SI 0 "csr_operand" "r")] UNSPECV_FSCSR)] "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT || TARGET_ZFINX" "fscsr\t%0") @@ -3085,9 +3085,11 @@ (define_insn "riscv_frflags" "frflags\t%0") (define_insn "riscv_fsflags" - [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:SI 0 "csr_operand" "rK")] UNSPECV_FSFLAGS)] + [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:SI 0 "csr_operand" "r,K")] UNSPECV_FSFLAGS)] "TARGET_HARD_FLOAT || TARGET_ZFINX" - "fsflags\t%0") + "@ + fsflags\t%0 + fsflagsi\t%0") (define_insn "*riscv_fsnvsnan<mode>2" [(unspec_volatile [(match_operand:ANYF 0 "register_operand" "f")