From patchwork Fri May 25 04:07:33 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Simon Guo X-Patchwork-Id: 920217 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sXrn61vhz9s19 for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:12:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="V3lq4V0G"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40sXrn2BM1zDrSt for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:12:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="V3lq4V0G"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c01::243; helo=mail-pl0-x243.google.com; envelope-from=wei.guo.simon@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="V3lq4V0G"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl0-x243.google.com (mail-pl0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sXlr5vYdzF1RG for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:07:52 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl0-x243.google.com with SMTP id az12-v6so2326900plb.8 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rJqmprCRo2eWkbvKr9PMpimRCI9hPyabLZZCsnrJzgE=; b=V3lq4V0GW2u9HF3Ub0fIjuhhj8fNR0N1xyJWagrVSGEYnH4czrlIlM0SpBumlj6zFk W2MhfkYg/lhJtVCDCLI4iZ51I9iSnCTpknews4NRhSPoJWEa9TJTxPR2bIb6qKJ9nkW3 aRxUwQf6VfogtcaulI++Fqyqn0pikMBVtw0+CS26hOjVb/nGH9s0OvlzOfafDz7fsH0z vzNtt1SHvf5zkQLRZTFO23jdZpHO+XdxBpyfFsaQXe1jdbNKXuXjnc9C9FG4xTCYUgXF rNPUN5dxWj8t19H/CCaeHCSvBBFiq7GNERpFv6Zny/n5b0veDkfHpWHX0yBw6l5VfSxY H01w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rJqmprCRo2eWkbvKr9PMpimRCI9hPyabLZZCsnrJzgE=; b=NnOZWi8BZMp+PBVP2i1/2Kh6W8B4g23f/ta5O2mSr/PIUb+azuYCC0Pl2O+H6qtYAI 01d5SdT4gQocwsKK7wpwtLl7q0IBe4G8QKNlrnCbJcF3rBY0xDJeoq/qEtfqLWAMC2PH ZR57/RDhS4K2RljPS3bV0oifvW1Gzan+XFJ/65yIy6oDU4oi962Q5X+wnRdwBDiIqHsq VY5X5pOru6EXa34TSgPUDh+okxuRccYt79vEMU+8TmW4R5+UBfkk1NSNnY8cdkBi+BqB +OEghDCSKucJ3cSI36haLZptUKkINvjky+NV01+r5VpDxOl82Q4a+0rwiJGSo1vR7bPq kf1A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcPEKOdBaHIr3u15YLIAnKL3+kIgaNsIsWf9zgciIpPtENYTVd6 mtXjCyzLQt4X44X/Y36MLdtBhQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo0GyFuVF5vrsB38XqBjkUwOSYWhbOYY5jzWLYA0OEaWqCIiItOwMmB8nZGx7aY2OgfMEs37w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9883:: with SMTP id s3-v6mr863927plp.179.1527221270816; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from simonLocalRHEL7.cn.ibm.com ([112.73.0.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b13-v6sm30138808pgu.54.2018.05.24.21.07.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:50 -0700 (PDT) From: wei.guo.simon@gmail.com To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v6 1/4] powerpc/64: Align bytes before fall back to .Lshort in powerpc64 memcmp() Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 12:07:33 +0800 Message-Id: <1527221256-17029-2-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> References: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" , Simon Guo , Cyril Bur Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Simon Guo Currently memcmp() 64bytes version in powerpc will fall back to .Lshort (compare per byte mode) if either src or dst address is not 8 bytes aligned. It can be opmitized in 2 situations: 1) if both addresses are with the same offset with 8 bytes boundary: memcmp() can compare the unaligned bytes within 8 bytes boundary firstly and then compare the rest 8-bytes-aligned content with .Llong mode. 2) If src/dst addrs are not with the same offset of 8 bytes boundary: memcmp() can align src addr with 8 bytes, increment dst addr accordingly, then load src with aligned mode and load dst with unaligned mode. This patch optmizes memcmp() behavior in the above 2 situations. Tested with both little/big endian. Performance result below is based on little endian. Following is the test result with src/dst having the same offset case: (a similar result was observed when src/dst having different offset): (1) 256 bytes Test with the existing tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp: - without patch 29.773018302 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.09% ) - with patch 16.485568173 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.02% ) -> There is ~+80% percent improvement (2) 32 bytes To observe performance impact on < 32 bytes, modify tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c with following: ------- #include #include "utils.h" -#define SIZE 256 +#define SIZE 32 #define ITERATIONS 10000 int test_memcmp(const void *s1, const void *s2, size_t n); -------- - Without patch 0.244746482 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.36%) - with patch 0.215069477 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.51%) -> There is ～+13% improvement (3) 0~8 bytes To observe <8 bytes performance impact, modify tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c with following: ------- #include #include "utils.h" -#define SIZE 256 -#define ITERATIONS 10000 +#define SIZE 8 +#define ITERATIONS 1000000 int test_memcmp(const void *s1, const void *s2, size_t n); ------- - Without patch 1.845642503 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.12% ) - With patch 1.849767135 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.26% ) -> They are nearly the same. (-0.2%) Signed-off-by: Simon Guo --- arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 136 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S index d75d18b..f20e883 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S @@ -24,28 +24,41 @@ #define rH r31 #ifdef __LITTLE_ENDIAN__ +#define LH lhbrx +#define LW lwbrx #define LD ldbrx #else +#define LH lhzx +#define LW lwzx #define LD ldx #endif +/* + * There are 2 categories for memcmp: + * 1) src/dst has the same offset to the 8 bytes boundary. The handlers + * are named like .Lsameoffset_xxxx + * 2) src/dst has different offset to the 8 bytes boundary. The handlers + * are named like .Ldiffoffset_xxxx + */ _GLOBAL(memcmp) cmpdi cr1,r5,0 - /* Use the short loop if both strings are not 8B aligned */ - or r6,r3,r4 + /* Use the short loop if the src/dst addresses are not + * with the same offset of 8 bytes align boundary. + */ + xor r6,r3,r4 andi. r6,r6,7 - /* Use the short loop if length is less than 32B */ - cmpdi cr6,r5,31 + /* Fall back to short loop if compare at aligned addrs + * with less than 8 bytes. + */ + cmpdi cr6,r5,7 beq cr1,.Lzero - bne .Lshort - bgt cr6,.Llong + bgt cr6,.Lno_short .Lshort: mtctr r5 - 1: lbz rA,0(r3) lbz rB,0(r4) subf. rC,rB,rA @@ -78,11 +91,90 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) li r3,0 blr +.Lno_short: + dcbt 0,r3 + dcbt 0,r4 + bne .Ldiffoffset_8bytes_make_align_start + + +.Lsameoffset_8bytes_make_align_start: + /* attempt to compare bytes not aligned with 8 bytes so that + * rest comparison can run based on 8 bytes alignment. + */ + andi. r6,r3,7 + + /* Try to compare the first double word which is not 8 bytes aligned: + * load the first double word at (src & ~7UL) and shift left appropriate + * bits before comparision. + */ + clrlwi r6,r3,29 + rlwinm r6,r6,3,0,28 + beq .Lsameoffset_8bytes_aligned + clrrdi r3,r3,3 + clrrdi r4,r4,3 + LD rA,0,r3 + LD rB,0,r4 + sld rA,rA,r6 + sld rB,rB,r6 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + srwi r6,r6,3 + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + subfic r6,r6,8 + subfc. r5,r6,r5 + addi r3,r3,8 + addi r4,r4,8 + beq .Lzero + +.Lsameoffset_8bytes_aligned: + /* now we are aligned with 8 bytes. + * Use .Llong loop if left cmp bytes are equal or greater than 32B. + */ + cmpdi cr6,r5,31 + bgt cr6,.Llong + +.Lcmp_lt32bytes: + /* compare 1 ~ 32 bytes, at least r3 addr is 8 bytes aligned now */ + cmpdi cr5,r5,7 + srdi r0,r5,3 + ble cr5,.Lcmp_rest_lt8bytes + + /* handle 8 ~ 31 bytes */ + clrldi r5,r5,61 + mtctr r0 +2: + LD rA,0,r3 + LD rB,0,r4 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + addi r3,r3,8 + addi r4,r4,8 + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + bdnz 2b + + cmpwi r5,0 + beq .Lzero + +.Lcmp_rest_lt8bytes: + /* Here we have only less than 8 bytes to compare with. at least s1 + * Address is aligned with 8 bytes. + * The next double words are load and shift right with appropriate + * bits. + */ + subfic r6,r5,8 + rlwinm r6,r6,3,0,28 + LD rA,0,r3 + LD rB,0,r4 + srd rA,rA,r6 + srd rB,rB,r6 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + b .Lzero + .Lnon_zero: mr r3,rC blr .Llong: + /* At least s1 addr is aligned with 8 bytes */ li off8,8 li off16,16 li off24,24 @@ -232,4 +324,41 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) ld r28,-32(r1) ld r27,-40(r1) blr + +.LcmpAB_lightweight: /* skip NV GPRS restore */ + li r3,1 + bgt cr0,8f + li r3,-1 +8: + blr + +.Ldiffoffset_8bytes_make_align_start: + /* now try to align s1 with 8 bytes */ + andi. r6,r3,0x7 + rlwinm r6,r6,3,0,28 + beq .Ldiffoffset_align_s1_8bytes + + clrrdi r3,r3,3 + LD rA,0,r3 + LD rB,0,r4 /* unaligned load */ + sld rA,rA,r6 + srd rA,rA,r6 + srd rB,rB,r6 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + srwi r6,r6,3 + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + + subfic r6,r6,8 + subfc. r5,r6,r5 + addi r3,r3,8 + add r4,r4,r6 + + beq .Lzero + +.Ldiffoffset_align_s1_8bytes: + /* now s1 is aligned with 8 bytes. */ + cmpdi cr5,r5,31 + ble cr5,.Lcmp_lt32bytes + b .Llong + EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcmp) From patchwork Fri May 25 04:07:34 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Simon Guo X-Patchwork-Id: 920218 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sXvv4kllz9s0q for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:14:51 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FD2D9h8s"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40sXvv2zwszF1fv for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:14:51 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FD2D9h8s"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243; helo=mail-pf0-x243.google.com; envelope-from=wei.guo.simon@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="FD2D9h8s"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf0-x243.google.com (mail-pf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sXlv6qsCzF1fC for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:07:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id c10-v6so1911694pfi.12 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=0Om4ABK2z19FujSvQiJOKJvAVv/CxXGBn4iTO0xdekQ=; b=FD2D9h8siHhC+gEVVYjaztDI/AjPBIAjzjsIfvGhVaMGoz4rTF1mf7SXsnv35gEM0R sTL8lTHjg1nY1hibSKXdJzMFGKNUZ3j9qMNTmxB42yEDWzWRj2JUkU8SISYnCXtVcjSJ gqmgKGpjEPOX/56XBxOn9QklTWV2/Jdm1/6CdT94LS2uA0xBwA6F9SShPNYffFbuTPwg 0pkBVSFaB8sFRr4pekFxCNCT21wpu1FFSmh4lKHtdKaMUXivVTeURbZD/u6hXx67zeuR oIZLbWy2HVTMnPId/NZgQgMfOkyWLCcAjDEBJLz3uqOTJTe0l8DhofMd20G1YO1AbA/s G7oQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=0Om4ABK2z19FujSvQiJOKJvAVv/CxXGBn4iTO0xdekQ=; b=QbTe7taWpaJSbRODS0czIyebY2RvrVaPeclr7k702CPGX9wfbv818syZhbcvxSvjO/ 9QwqfIYfI+Cw2TAFwztrA6jk7T65CKz7eTX92dMGZ2iiHIUwKTDI4L2T7JdDqOivHC5L eyhnZi5AcPnmdUJFomSzGaUBHPTKXeCBo+RD8o2LKQjOCTT99FNjvU0nJ6dv5CHfgn/k PRPRKLzpTj5D2TmI0qBz5GgYNUHd7NuiuKy1/QqjYjuZzMP3Y7XIdpJcia799S5KGTb5 MLqmtJ4Aswt4mopo+BccPZyLNvm10xiBwhULxo89NQVIXUBDasur0lNWvdU6h8bEud7j X7mA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcWw39riL1BdIZx+iNessZXt8f3TnkTBSPyT0ebytiFy+N77y1w BgEQU+r7y9a+9CJmNR283LXwtw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZpCUNjUWYPePSXPfND3IhC2lz0rITuQEyQXYb6I4gYAVCsdMOeE+QFBAvIFn6tt7s5bBLyNOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a62:b909:: with SMTP id z9-v6mr846420pfe.254.1527221273661; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from simonLocalRHEL7.cn.ibm.com ([112.73.0.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b13-v6sm30138808pgu.54.2018.05.24.21.07.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:53 -0700 (PDT) From: wei.guo.simon@gmail.com To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v6 2/4] powerpc/64: enhance memcmp() with VMX instruction for long bytes comparision Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 12:07:34 +0800 Message-Id: <1527221256-17029-3-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> References: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" , Simon Guo , Cyril Bur Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Simon Guo This patch add VMX primitives to do memcmp() in case the compare size is equal or greater than 4K bytes. KSM feature can benefit from this. Test result with following test program(replace the "^>" with ""): ------ ># cat tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c >#include >#include >#include >#include >#include "utils.h" >#define SIZE (1024 * 1024 * 900) >#define ITERATIONS 40 int test_memcmp(const void *s1, const void *s2, size_t n); static int testcase(void) { char *s1; char *s2; unsigned long i; s1 = memalign(128, SIZE); if (!s1) { perror("memalign"); exit(1); } s2 = memalign(128, SIZE); if (!s2) { perror("memalign"); exit(1); } for (i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) { s1[i] = i & 0xff; s2[i] = i & 0xff; } for (i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) { int ret = test_memcmp(s1, s2, SIZE); if (ret) { printf("return %d at[%ld]! should have returned zero\n", ret, i); abort(); } } return 0; } int main(void) { return test_harness(testcase, "memcmp"); } ------ Without this patch (but with the first patch "powerpc/64: Align bytes before fall back to .Lshort in powerpc64 memcmp()." in the series): 4.726728762 seconds time elapsed ( +- 3.54%) With VMX patch: 4.234335473 seconds time elapsed ( +- 2.63%) There is ~+10% improvement. Testing with unaligned and different offset version (make s1 and s2 shift random offset within 16 bytes) can archieve higher improvement than 10%.. Signed-off-by: Simon Guo --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h | 4 +- arch/powerpc/lib/copypage_power7.S | 4 +- arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S | 233 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_power7.S | 6 +- arch/powerpc/lib/vmx-helper.c | 4 +- 5 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h index d9713ad..31fdcee 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ void __trace_hcall_exit(long opcode, unsigned long retval, /* VMX copying */ int enter_vmx_usercopy(void); int exit_vmx_usercopy(void); -int enter_vmx_copy(void); -void * exit_vmx_copy(void *dest); +int enter_vmx_ops(void); +void *exit_vmx_ops(void *dest); /* Traps */ long machine_check_early(struct pt_regs *regs); diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/copypage_power7.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/copypage_power7.S index 8fa73b7..e38f956 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/copypage_power7.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/copypage_power7.S @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ _GLOBAL(copypage_power7) std r4,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R30)(r1) std r0,16(r1) stdu r1,-STACKFRAMESIZE(r1) - bl enter_vmx_copy + bl enter_vmx_ops cmpwi r3,0 ld r0,STACKFRAMESIZE+16(r1) ld r3,STK_REG(R31)(r1) @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ _GLOBAL(copypage_power7) addi r3,r3,128 bdnz 1b - b exit_vmx_copy /* tail call optimise */ + b exit_vmx_ops /* tail call optimise */ #else li r0,(PAGE_SIZE/128) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S index f20e883..4ba7bb6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S @@ -27,12 +27,73 @@ #define LH lhbrx #define LW lwbrx #define LD ldbrx +#define LVS lvsr +#define VPERM(_VRT,_VRA,_VRB,_VRC) \ + vperm _VRT,_VRB,_VRA,_VRC #else #define LH lhzx #define LW lwzx #define LD ldx +#define LVS lvsl +#define VPERM(_VRT,_VRA,_VRB,_VRC) \ + vperm _VRT,_VRA,_VRB,_VRC #endif +#define VMX_THRESH 4096 +#define ENTER_VMX_OPS \ + mflr r0; \ + std r3,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R31)(r1); \ + std r4,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R30)(r1); \ + std r5,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R29)(r1); \ + std r0,16(r1); \ + stdu r1,-STACKFRAMESIZE(r1); \ + bl enter_vmx_ops; \ + cmpwi cr1,r3,0; \ + ld r0,STACKFRAMESIZE+16(r1); \ + ld r3,STK_REG(R31)(r1); \ + ld r4,STK_REG(R30)(r1); \ + ld r5,STK_REG(R29)(r1); \ + addi r1,r1,STACKFRAMESIZE; \ + mtlr r0 + +#define EXIT_VMX_OPS \ + mflr r0; \ + std r3,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R31)(r1); \ + std r4,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R30)(r1); \ + std r5,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R29)(r1); \ + std r0,16(r1); \ + stdu r1,-STACKFRAMESIZE(r1); \ + bl exit_vmx_ops; \ + ld r0,STACKFRAMESIZE+16(r1); \ + ld r3,STK_REG(R31)(r1); \ + ld r4,STK_REG(R30)(r1); \ + ld r5,STK_REG(R29)(r1); \ + addi r1,r1,STACKFRAMESIZE; \ + mtlr r0 + +/* + * LD_VSR_CROSS16B load the 2nd 16 bytes for _vaddr which is unaligned with + * 16 bytes boundary and permute the result with the 1st 16 bytes. + + * | y y y y y y y y y y y y y 0 1 2 | 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f z z z | + * ^ ^ ^ + * 0xbbbb10 0xbbbb20 0xbbb30 + * ^ + * _vaddr + * + * + * _vmask is the mask generated by LVS + * _v1st_qw is the 1st aligned QW of current addr which is already loaded. + * for example: 0xyyyyyyyyyyyyy012 for big endian + * _v2nd_qw is the 2nd aligned QW of cur _vaddr to be loaded. + * for example: 0x3456789abcdefzzz for big endian + * The permute result is saved in _v_res. + * for example: 0x0123456789abcdef for big endian. + */ +#define LD_VSR_CROSS16B(_vaddr,_vmask,_v1st_qw,_v2nd_qw,_v_res) \ + lvx _v2nd_qw,_vaddr,off16; \ + VPERM(_v_res,_v1st_qw,_v2nd_qw,_vmask) + /* * There are 2 categories for memcmp: * 1) src/dst has the same offset to the 8 bytes boundary. The handlers @@ -133,7 +194,7 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) bgt cr6,.Llong .Lcmp_lt32bytes: - /* compare 1 ~ 32 bytes, at least r3 addr is 8 bytes aligned now */ + /* compare 1 ~ 31 bytes, at least r3 addr is 8 bytes aligned now */ cmpdi cr5,r5,7 srdi r0,r5,3 ble cr5,.Lcmp_rest_lt8bytes @@ -174,6 +235,13 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) blr .Llong: +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC + /* Try to use vmx loop if length is equal or greater than 4K */ + cmpldi cr6,r5,VMX_THRESH + bge cr6,.Lsameoffset_vmx_cmp + +.Llong_novmx_cmp: +#endif /* At least s1 addr is aligned with 8 bytes */ li off8,8 li off16,16 @@ -332,7 +400,94 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) 8: blr +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC +.Lsameoffset_vmx_cmp: + /* Enter with src/dst addrs has the same offset with 8 bytes + * align boundary + */ + ENTER_VMX_OPS + beq cr1,.Llong_novmx_cmp + +3: + /* need to check whether r4 has the same offset with r3 + * for 16 bytes boundary. + */ + xor r0,r3,r4 + andi. r0,r0,0xf + bne .Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp_start + + /* len is no less than 4KB. Need to align with 16 bytes further. + */ + andi. rA,r3,8 + LD rA,0,r3 + beq 4f + LD rB,0,r4 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + addi r3,r3,8 + addi r4,r4,8 + addi r5,r5,-8 + + beq cr0,4f + /* save and restore cr0 */ + mfocrf r5,64 + EXIT_VMX_OPS + mtocrf 64,r5 + b .LcmpAB_lightweight + +4: + /* compare 32 bytes for each loop */ + srdi r0,r5,5 + mtctr r0 + clrldi r5,r5,59 + li off16,16 + +.balign 16 +5: + lvx v0,0,r3 + lvx v1,0,r4 + vcmpequd. v0,v0,v1 + bf 24,7f + lvx v0,off16,r3 + lvx v1,off16,r4 + vcmpequd. v0,v0,v1 + bf 24,6f + addi r3,r3,32 + addi r4,r4,32 + bdnz 5b + + EXIT_VMX_OPS + cmpdi r5,0 + beq .Lzero + b .Lcmp_lt32bytes + +6: + addi r3,r3,16 + addi r4,r4,16 + +7: + /* diff the last 16 bytes */ + EXIT_VMX_OPS + LD rA,0,r3 + LD rB,0,r4 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + li off8,8 + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + + LD rA,off8,r3 + LD rB,off8,r4 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + b .Lzero +#endif + .Ldiffoffset_8bytes_make_align_start: +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC + /* only do vmx ops when the size equal or greater than 4K bytes */ + cmpdi cr5,r5,VMX_THRESH + bge cr5,.Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp +.Ldiffoffset_novmx_cmp: +#endif + /* now try to align s1 with 8 bytes */ andi. r6,r3,0x7 rlwinm r6,r6,3,0,28 @@ -359,6 +514,82 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) /* now s1 is aligned with 8 bytes. */ cmpdi cr5,r5,31 ble cr5,.Lcmp_lt32bytes + +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC + b .Llong_novmx_cmp +#else b .Llong +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC +.Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp: + ENTER_VMX_OPS + beq cr1,.Ldiffoffset_novmx_cmp + +.Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp_start: + /* Firstly try to align r3 with 16 bytes */ + andi. r6,r3,0xf + li off16,16 + beq .Ldiffoffset_vmx_s1_16bytes_align + LVS v3,0,r3 + LVS v4,0,r4 + + lvx v5,0,r3 + lvx v6,0,r4 + LD_VSR_CROSS16B(r3,v3,v5,v7,v9) + LD_VSR_CROSS16B(r4,v4,v6,v8,v10) + + vcmpequb. v7,v9,v10 + bnl cr6,.Ldiffoffset_vmx_diff_found + + subfic r6,r6,16 + subf r5,r6,r5 + add r3,r3,r6 + add r4,r4,r6 + +.Ldiffoffset_vmx_s1_16bytes_align: + /* now s1 is aligned with 16 bytes */ + lvx v6,0,r4 + LVS v4,0,r4 + srdi r6,r5,5 /* loop for 32 bytes each */ + clrldi r5,r5,59 + mtctr r6 + +.balign 16 +.Ldiffoffset_vmx_32bytesloop: + /* the first qw of r4 was saved in v6 */ + lvx v9,0,r3 + LD_VSR_CROSS16B(r4,v4,v6,v8,v10) + vcmpequb. v7,v9,v10 + vor v6,v8,v8 + bnl cr6,.Ldiffoffset_vmx_diff_found + + addi r3,r3,16 + addi r4,r4,16 + + lvx v9,0,r3 + LD_VSR_CROSS16B(r4,v4,v6,v8,v10) + vcmpequb. v7,v9,v10 + vor v6,v8,v8 + bnl cr6,.Ldiffoffset_vmx_diff_found + + addi r3,r3,16 + addi r4,r4,16 + + bdnz .Ldiffoffset_vmx_32bytesloop + + EXIT_VMX_OPS + + cmpdi r5,0 + beq .Lzero + b .Lcmp_lt32bytes + +.Ldiffoffset_vmx_diff_found: + EXIT_VMX_OPS + /* anyway, the diff will appear in next 16 bytes */ + li r5,16 + b .Lcmp_lt32bytes + +#endif EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcmp) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_power7.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_power7.S index df7de9d..070cdf6 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_power7.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_power7.S @@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ _GLOBAL(memcpy_power7) std r5,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R29)(r1) std r0,16(r1) stdu r1,-STACKFRAMESIZE(r1) - bl enter_vmx_copy + bl enter_vmx_ops cmpwi cr1,r3,0 ld r0,STACKFRAMESIZE+16(r1) ld r3,STK_REG(R31)(r1) @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ _GLOBAL(memcpy_power7) 15: addi r1,r1,STACKFRAMESIZE ld r3,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R31)(r1) - b exit_vmx_copy /* tail call optimise */ + b exit_vmx_ops /* tail call optimise */ .Lvmx_unaligned_copy: /* Get the destination 16B aligned */ @@ -649,5 +649,5 @@ _GLOBAL(memcpy_power7) 15: addi r1,r1,STACKFRAMESIZE ld r3,-STACKFRAMESIZE+STK_REG(R31)(r1) - b exit_vmx_copy /* tail call optimise */ + b exit_vmx_ops /* tail call optimise */ #endif /* CONFIG_ALTIVEC */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/vmx-helper.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/vmx-helper.c index bf925cd..9f34049 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/vmx-helper.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/vmx-helper.c @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int exit_vmx_usercopy(void) return 0; } -int enter_vmx_copy(void) +int enter_vmx_ops(void) { if (in_interrupt()) return 0; @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ int enter_vmx_copy(void) * passed a pointer to the destination which we return as required by a * memcpy implementation. */ -void *exit_vmx_copy(void *dest) +void *exit_vmx_ops(void *dest) { disable_kernel_altivec(); preempt_enable(); From patchwork Fri May 25 04:07:35 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Simon Guo X-Patchwork-Id: 920219 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sXyY3T8Xz9s0q for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:17:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="SUfSo779"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40sXyY1tyZzDrSt for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:17:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="SUfSo779"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242; helo=mail-pf0-x242.google.com; envelope-from=wei.guo.simon@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="SUfSo779"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf0-x242.google.com (mail-pf0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sXlz2QlXzF1fr for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:07:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf0-x242.google.com with SMTP id p14-v6so1912699pfh.9 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=AVVqYrThuz3x+jIG0sdhvrdZ5GaRac0Au+ixoQuSyHE=; b=SUfSo779YJ4Ma00lglDxF4Mg5lkvpJJB5AuG1/jwzJcODthapz8ubdelJH1uRSGzDH stTusZAd9chys/dQruo0DYDtu60ZAzICGJnUdaZvYCEsvGZgQX/BA0ycDjstJm4Z5TVi BkwTWlVBPVg7Hk+od+zZjLVRGGFSCUm/mEy6fkYMka5Vhh3y92H6WO1Xaf9XnJFQUFwC O1zFDYiCaWPUlhHkaK6D5tzVHBk5zNE76QDRZroqjhZZXpquk1xJN9qCrpcTSR/RStDs aDo3dzJuY3GIrZxNJIdyUr7/vNi9XybO9jsiExxH61kF7/mWTmCx59J9r4+1pOhJxacS mOsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=AVVqYrThuz3x+jIG0sdhvrdZ5GaRac0Au+ixoQuSyHE=; b=UTFn4h4hmic1m7jThOGXxJN9wkTMOlF12yz1emw/wLkVcVLvyjqhymjnRZF4ZR4niF 4G8/MXL60Eq4+OJXHn3glxloNBju7qdR/QKcjKtAIG0YMLAGMsZGPdpuEuQQz72efmzk z5KkAtvloQahZEax5jBBEnS4kDxkSyk5Jhrlzlr9xzeAX1OCeeIWZyqCrNWKgiRDxbNP vY3f3fN/MqUNhchagZU2uUa3mBZE8JWTalync/hqKAlSqjDUSn3wosKwfp2O1AyTSClE NXpsQA4Isavm47G06+0evuxbMuW5PUi9LKmmaGEz3KjEj3TOLyOsJ/NB6e0O0DAYnWfR akKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwefOt0zz7IbEKqZisSIPTSit3UGo7HNkujIuSOPdHXtC5fZ1M83 HU5vvFa0IrMm3FTYSwyIl7mOTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZo9DnZGrhlQ9rMLTh06Oo6gcNqgBBlN71hk3YbKhw+iXHLKJrVeHjt7W0ZomvZjBIfVTpFQQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b307:: with SMTP id i7-v6mr659754pgf.448.1527221277345; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from simonLocalRHEL7.cn.ibm.com ([112.73.0.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b13-v6sm30138808pgu.54.2018.05.24.21.07.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:56 -0700 (PDT) From: wei.guo.simon@gmail.com To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v6 3/4] powerpc/64: add 32 bytes prechecking before using VMX optimization on memcmp() Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 12:07:35 +0800 Message-Id: <1527221256-17029-4-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> References: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" , Simon Guo , Cyril Bur Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Simon Guo This patch is based on the previous VMX patch on memcmp(). To optimize ppc64 memcmp() with VMX instruction, we need to think about the VMX penalty brought with: If kernel uses VMX instruction, it needs to save/restore current thread's VMX registers. There are 32 x 128 bits VMX registers in PPC, which means 32 x 16 = 512 bytes for load and store. The major concern regarding the memcmp() performance in kernel is KSM, who will use memcmp() frequently to merge identical pages. So it will make sense to take some measures/enhancement on KSM to see whether any improvement can be done here. Cyril Bur indicates that the memcmp() for KSM has a higher possibility to fail (unmatch) early in previous bytes in following mail. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/817322/#1773629 And I am taking a follow-up on this with this patch. Per some testing, it shows KSM memcmp() will fail early at previous 32 bytes. More specifically: - 76% cases will fail/unmatch before 16 bytes; - 83% cases will fail/unmatch before 32 bytes; - 84% cases will fail/unmatch before 64 bytes; So 32 bytes looks a better choice than other bytes for pre-checking. The early failure is also true for memcmp() for non-KSM case. With a non-typical call load, it shows ~73% cases fail before first 32 bytes. This patch adds a 32 bytes pre-checking firstly before jumping into VMX operations, to avoid the unnecessary VMX penalty. It is not limited to KSM case. And the testing shows ~20% improvement on memcmp() average execution time with this patch. And note the 32B pre-checking is only performed when the compare size is long enough (>=4K currently) to allow VMX operation. The detail data and analysis is at: https://github.com/justdoitqd/publicFiles/blob/master/memcmp/README.md Signed-off-by: Simon Guo --- arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S index 4ba7bb6..96eb08b 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S @@ -403,8 +403,27 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC .Lsameoffset_vmx_cmp: /* Enter with src/dst addrs has the same offset with 8 bytes - * align boundary + * align boundary. + * + * There is an optimization based on following fact: memcmp() + * prones to fail early at the first 32 bytes. + * Before applying VMX instructions which will lead to 32x128bits + * VMX regs load/restore penalty, we compare the first 32 bytes + * so that we can catch the ~80% fail cases. */ + + li r0,4 + mtctr r0 +.Lsameoffset_prechk_32B_loop: + LD rA,0,r3 + LD rB,0,r4 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + addi r3,r3,8 + addi r4,r4,8 + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + addi r5,r5,-8 + bdnz .Lsameoffset_prechk_32B_loop + ENTER_VMX_OPS beq cr1,.Llong_novmx_cmp @@ -481,13 +500,6 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) #endif .Ldiffoffset_8bytes_make_align_start: -#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC - /* only do vmx ops when the size equal or greater than 4K bytes */ - cmpdi cr5,r5,VMX_THRESH - bge cr5,.Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp -.Ldiffoffset_novmx_cmp: -#endif - /* now try to align s1 with 8 bytes */ andi. r6,r3,0x7 rlwinm r6,r6,3,0,28 @@ -512,6 +524,13 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) .Ldiffoffset_align_s1_8bytes: /* now s1 is aligned with 8 bytes. */ +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC + /* only do vmx ops when the size is equal or greater than 4K bytes */ + cmpdi cr5,r5,VMX_THRESH + bge cr5,.Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp +.Ldiffoffset_novmx_cmp: +#endif + cmpdi cr5,r5,31 ble cr5,.Lcmp_lt32bytes @@ -523,6 +542,21 @@ _GLOBAL(memcmp) #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC .Ldiffoffset_vmx_cmp: + /* perform a 32 bytes pre-checking before + * enable VMX operations. + */ + li r0,4 + mtctr r0 +.Ldiffoffset_prechk_32B_loop: + LD rA,0,r3 + LD rB,0,r4 + cmpld cr0,rA,rB + addi r3,r3,8 + addi r4,r4,8 + bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight + addi r5,r5,-8 + bdnz .Ldiffoffset_prechk_32B_loop + ENTER_VMX_OPS beq cr1,.Ldiffoffset_novmx_cmp From patchwork Fri May 25 04:07:36 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Simon Guo X-Patchwork-Id: 920220 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sY162vZ4z9s0q for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:19:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sfSJNrWy"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40sY161Q7gzF1gN for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:19:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sfSJNrWy"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244; helo=mail-pg0-x244.google.com; envelope-from=wei.guo.simon@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sfSJNrWy"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40sXm23yZ4zF1f8 for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 14:08:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id a3-v6so1706813pgt.13 for ; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:08:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=ZSbbainrxZI8up1zNHL/QMm6RUND7vTONPTJLt0HBjo=; b=sfSJNrWyqPDPBLwr4gYjQDt7lBQla0mubsi7xlofOHa+cHyf2bSpmD6EFWr6IX5df+ ldN1YWF6TQk9hT/jP058coGxR8NiYnZmSdOHQvmBRd1+pqqrXtOFaetk1UA2KSPYfRhQ g0eDwbj4Dxj+qAjMWRLarPRc7gJ7KIb7VSyBGNLNg42DSrSquwXmsCLRE9KBSHNG+HZB gtY+0wZDfcX53fkxUMT840m2LBHQlUA0pSYK/ADHMUAzkCN5gq1KLdeARfmTfJ48Nw4j c0RL4aw4WNABSIRJ8C0v+l1Pn/jNRa7MIJ6yJ8b4U4PLVWt7PdupQ4jPj9ZRp3boZ5NZ dmMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=ZSbbainrxZI8up1zNHL/QMm6RUND7vTONPTJLt0HBjo=; b=q/DEswbkocIbl78QHQQBy++OTLtYIJKeZ8gcARcFE3YOUeeWvkO3D+nDwIKf8SkATL Hyzly901AULGKXg58wWpRjNQpk4OzFbf3jRKxBW0s30OOMIn+YQj3cQCvtc7sPqzE7UR L3RFuxBcrdMLNyvNfsPGBuK9L5hhVac0TQb7uV5/5SezhgKSIlaEDMvJLEE5Nsa8vqdO 2h+eIa0jKM4Ak9/KaPXGHCGGrTWAwGXkjvjissjfGmGc9v0YlLpqexDN1pY8CFtUj8eA uvFINh/rXLNV5C7EJvT6vNS3VdKGt+5fa+g08Re00SYIw+Ca3Ly77/iHPeNsiCv/Qvtn Fwmw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPweqOnjBBlQHXR/FZ+EyIA3x0LSix8EPPLcvxB9LkkMdAoQZmQXq NgFq/o6kOcZkF4GrWHZAAs1t1A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZquIk0Wm2tCm69/wH58RoEE/kW/97o8sUS/3FPB/780zJUz8DnSt5rbDmMUctS87j3FqyxAIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:6ec6:: with SMTP id j189-v6mr641656pgc.71.1527221280129; Thu, 24 May 2018 21:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from simonLocalRHEL7.cn.ibm.com ([112.73.0.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b13-v6sm30138808pgu.54.2018.05.24.21.07.57 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 May 2018 21:07:59 -0700 (PDT) From: wei.guo.simon@gmail.com To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: [PATCH v6 4/4] powerpc:selftest update memcmp_64 selftest for VMX implementation Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 12:07:36 +0800 Message-Id: <1527221256-17029-5-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> References: <1527221256-17029-1-git-send-email-wei.guo.simon@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" , Simon Guo , Cyril Bur Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Simon Guo This patch reworked selftest memcmp_64 so that memcmp selftest can cover more test cases. It adds testcases for: - memcmp over 4K bytes size. - s1/s2 with different/random offset on 16 bytes boundary. - enter/exit_vmx_ops pairness. Signed-off-by: Simon Guo --- .../selftests/powerpc/copyloops/asm/ppc_asm.h | 4 +- .../selftests/powerpc/stringloops/asm/ppc_asm.h | 22 +++++ .../testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/asm/ppc_asm.h b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/asm/ppc_asm.h index 5ffe04d..dfce161 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/asm/ppc_asm.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/copyloops/asm/ppc_asm.h @@ -36,11 +36,11 @@ li r3,0 blr -FUNC_START(enter_vmx_copy) +FUNC_START(enter_vmx_ops) li r3,1 blr -FUNC_START(exit_vmx_copy) +FUNC_START(exit_vmx_ops) blr FUNC_START(memcpy_power7) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/asm/ppc_asm.h b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/asm/ppc_asm.h index 136242e..185d257 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/asm/ppc_asm.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/asm/ppc_asm.h @@ -1,4 +1,6 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _PPC_ASM_H +#define __PPC_ASM_H #include #ifndef r1 @@ -6,3 +8,23 @@ #endif #define _GLOBAL(A) FUNC_START(test_ ## A) + +#define CONFIG_ALTIVEC + +#define R14 r14 +#define R15 r15 +#define R16 r16 +#define R17 r17 +#define R18 r18 +#define R19 r19 +#define R20 r20 +#define R21 r21 +#define R22 r22 +#define R29 r29 +#define R30 r30 +#define R31 r31 + +#define STACKFRAMESIZE 256 +#define STK_REG(i) (112 + ((i)-14)*8) + +#endif diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c index 8250db2..b5cf717 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/memcmp.c @@ -2,20 +2,40 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "utils.h" #define SIZE 256 #define ITERATIONS 10000 +#define LARGE_SIZE (5 * 1024) +#define LARGE_ITERATIONS 1000 +#define LARGE_MAX_OFFSET 32 +#define LARGE_SIZE_START 4096 + +#define MAX_OFFSET_DIFF_S1_S2 48 + +int vmx_count; +int enter_vmx_ops(void) +{ + vmx_count++; + return 1; +} + +void exit_vmx_ops(void) +{ + vmx_count--; +} int test_memcmp(const void *s1, const void *s2, size_t n); /* test all offsets and lengths */ -static void test_one(char *s1, char *s2) +static void test_one(char *s1, char *s2, unsigned long max_offset, + unsigned long size_start, unsigned long max_size) { unsigned long offset, size; - for (offset = 0; offset < SIZE; offset++) { - for (size = 0; size < (SIZE-offset); size++) { + for (offset = 0; offset < max_offset; offset++) { + for (size = size_start; size < (max_size - offset); size++) { int x, y; unsigned long i; @@ -35,70 +55,104 @@ static void test_one(char *s1, char *s2) printf("\n"); abort(); } + + if (vmx_count != 0) { + printf("vmx enter/exit not paired.(offset:%ld size:%ld s1:%p s2:%p vc:%d\n", + offset, size, s1, s2, vmx_count); + printf("\n"); + abort(); + } } } } -static int testcase(void) +static int testcase(bool islarge) { char *s1; char *s2; unsigned long i; - s1 = memalign(128, SIZE); + unsigned long comp_size = (islarge ? LARGE_SIZE : SIZE); + unsigned long alloc_size = comp_size + MAX_OFFSET_DIFF_S1_S2; + int iterations = islarge ? LARGE_ITERATIONS : ITERATIONS; + + s1 = memalign(128, alloc_size); if (!s1) { perror("memalign"); exit(1); } - s2 = memalign(128, SIZE); + s2 = memalign(128, alloc_size); if (!s2) { perror("memalign"); exit(1); } - srandom(1); + srandom(time(0)); - for (i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { unsigned long j; unsigned long change; + char *rand_s1 = s1; + char *rand_s2 = s2; - for (j = 0; j < SIZE; j++) + for (j = 0; j < alloc_size; j++) s1[j] = random(); - memcpy(s2, s1, SIZE); + rand_s1 += random() % MAX_OFFSET_DIFF_S1_S2; + rand_s2 += random() % MAX_OFFSET_DIFF_S1_S2; + memcpy(rand_s2, rand_s1, comp_size); /* change one byte */ - change = random() % SIZE; - s2[change] = random() & 0xff; - - test_one(s1, s2); + change = random() % comp_size; + rand_s2[change] = random() & 0xff; + + if (islarge) + test_one(rand_s1, rand_s2, LARGE_MAX_OFFSET, + LARGE_SIZE_START, comp_size); + else + test_one(rand_s1, rand_s2, SIZE, 0, comp_size); } - srandom(1); + srandom(time(0)); - for (i = 0; i < ITERATIONS; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { unsigned long j; unsigned long change; + char *rand_s1 = s1; + char *rand_s2 = s2; - for (j = 0; j < SIZE; j++) + for (j = 0; j < alloc_size; j++) s1[j] = random(); - memcpy(s2, s1, SIZE); + rand_s1 += random() % MAX_OFFSET_DIFF_S1_S2; + rand_s2 += random() % MAX_OFFSET_DIFF_S1_S2; + memcpy(rand_s2, rand_s1, comp_size); /* change multiple bytes, 1/8 of total */ - for (j = 0; j < SIZE / 8; j++) { - change = random() % SIZE; + for (j = 0; j < comp_size / 8; j++) { + change = random() % comp_size; s2[change] = random() & 0xff; } - test_one(s1, s2); + if (islarge) + test_one(rand_s1, rand_s2, LARGE_MAX_OFFSET, + LARGE_SIZE_START, comp_size); + else + test_one(rand_s1, rand_s2, SIZE, 0, comp_size); } return 0; } +static int testcases(void) +{ + testcase(0); + testcase(1); + return 0; +} + int main(void) { - return test_harness(testcase, "memcmp"); + return test_harness(testcases, "memcmp"); }