From patchwork Mon Oct 7 05:39:32 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Nysal Jan K.A." X-Patchwork-Id: 1993409 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=sNjhjZjB; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev+bounces-1783-incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XMSgC54sZz1xvB for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:40:55 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XMSg640Spz2yMt; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:40:50 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1728279650; cv=none; b=Y9SC6YU4woeEBdYiijCCiKIEOLjY9OoVB+LqYS4frYDarxRrHP2nW6ALQbXQknwYwnoq87k1M5z9Dp+AwdhbzRqWnruyZRU325zPfbc4gSleNYczuvuGSIrnj+NL9QIVc9ND6MrfVtrwmzc4Biba650rvivDUbWnHEbu8vsfD+Lt2XVdg1NEu7nzJNr4u2e0hAhJ4I/bwnlaxVsbsJJEqZEzif6JPj1V5lGS9qDPvRpir6W0463fuUZ5k74+xM1qNiHeV0fEED0WJkyFkcj39QDWpXaNk8D+rzCOagz9nkCU/ze3yKhp/GSxwydK330o13HCtKgn8hSiXlkl4NCyIg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1728279650; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=YVpQRnzWLCjGXCfVMKGoRaXUhi59IGwbCEnH+odbRp8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=XNJ1FC/KHhoDIMvuCjmOhUwCnC0U2BEzZbp1M2fvQU/KTSvQb0sV7JGzeDLfvwi+c9MYXX2ULspK8Ff3JEEK/tVcGyF4ud9xEQY87Az4y5fYO9LrhUvIqS7gT43mHqPn7/OvRQgXtLooZTvDrwOJ7wDJBLLZDHohS30M5jIS90NVmiMgkwXUzodJf594NqhpHbj2RM3f2iVsV6tTiN9TPqtmMAuxF67YpH9ZKxnjPerAfoAfYKyWIUtcxn90P6F5t6ng/dJDAW1fdALyuBCwUz3F2EaYVomKiWWqz844ZeV+lIHZLGF+pFFLaGsfZBJTTYiqrrnXi2fkZq+7OqbRhg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=sNjhjZjB; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nysal@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=sNjhjZjB; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=nysal@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XMSg51Bmpz2yLg for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:40:48 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4974JsDb024539; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:40:24 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=YVpQRnzWLCjGXCfVMKGoRaXUhi 59IGwbCEnH+odbRp8=; b=sNjhjZjBre5eDLD4BD2645IxK4qQNaLlwbxKLv/+LL Hi72lwAV2EB1nQxoa3Ypgaxsu5XKwc2qT0h/g2xEVSytan2q7gIqpx6ewvBXwRtX 7FR6WDlC4sz/iR0QCsCj0jbJKaboCJNcPsaivhdKMDYpTgQSNfPzLeUZFPIWS8Hi YTkV/sYgFRfInqhLcIIoT8mARaD8pQ36EjWOq9EbLFleHljs0rCx6pWE2IeKLRtr tsaRLjnTkDmJ1YgF0N7EATT0LNFNIrMVUNDgqOZFgqthZIrO03Ex8+Ro01SEtc++ eH02l4eL26NRuiuzJqsJbwkrEiE0YjVY9CPe7Ra9IL2A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4248h1g8u3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:40:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0356517.ppops.net (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 4975eNpI021204; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:40:23 GMT Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4248h1g8u2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:40:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 49751H2a022867; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:40:22 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 423jg0mf3j-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 07 Oct 2024 05:40:22 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 4975eIKp52756846 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:40:18 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6750A20049; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:40:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B53920040; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:40:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-80eaad4c-2afd-11b2-a85c-af8123d033e3.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.47.32]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 7 Oct 2024 05:40:14 +0000 (GMT) From: "Nysal Jan K.A." To: Andrew Morton Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Nysal Jan K.A" , Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , Bill Wendling , Justin Stitt , Vlastimil Babka , Kent Overstreet , Rick Edgecombe , Roman Gushchin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH] sched/membarrier: Fix redundant load of membarrier_state Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 11:09:32 +0530 Message-ID: <20241007053936.833392-1-nysal@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.2 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Q1mO7SjCHn1YLn4pkYaKQsvL8C9UN_Cd X-Proofpoint-GUID: _-4VV4ZENx6hWaATop6qUVBBWxVEMWij X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-06_21,2024-10-04_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2410070036 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on lists.ozlabs.org From: "Nysal Jan K.A" On architectures where ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE is not selected, sync_core_before_usermode() is a no-op. In membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode() the compiler does not eliminate redundant branches and the load of mm->membarrier_state for this case as the atomic_read() cannot be optimized away. Here's a snippet of the code generated for finish_task_switch() on powerpc: 1b786c: ld r26,2624(r30) # mm = rq->prev_mm; ....... 1b78c8: cmpdi cr7,r26,0 1b78cc: beq cr7,1b78e4 1b78d0: ld r9,2312(r13) # current 1b78d4: ld r9,1888(r9) # current->mm 1b78d8: cmpd cr7,r26,r9 1b78dc: beq cr7,1b7a70 1b78e0: hwsync 1b78e4: cmplwi cr7,r27,128 ....... 1b7a70: lwz r9,176(r26) # atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state) 1b7a74: b 1b78e0 This was found while analyzing "perf c2c" reports on kernels prior to commit c1753fd02a00 ("mm: move mm_count into its own cache line") where mm_count was false sharing with membarrier_state. There is a minor improvement in the size of finish_task_switch(). The following are results from bloat-o-meter: GCC 7.5.0: ---------- add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-32 (-32) Function old new delta finish_task_switch 884 852 -32 GCC 12.2.1: ----------- add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-32 (-32) Function old new delta finish_task_switch.isra 852 820 -32 LLVM 17.0.6: ------------ add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-36 (-36) Function old new delta rt_mutex_schedule 120 104 -16 finish_task_switch 792 772 -20 Signed-off-by: Nysal Jan K.A --- include/linux/sched/mm.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h index 07bb8d4181d7..042e60ab853a 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h @@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ enum { static inline void membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode(struct mm_struct *mm) { + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE)) + return; if (current->mm != mm) return; if (likely(!(atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state) &