From patchwork Fri Sep 8 13:27:36 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1831543 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=p3fheJjc; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxm021MHz1yhG for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:29:20 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=p3fheJjc; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rhxm00wL3z3cLk for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:29:20 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=p3fheJjc; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxkh2M4kz2yD4 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:28:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388D1iwH018194; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:49 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=fI44C9skaMuMgh+MdxQZgtp0H/3OugomwMmIxnbdI2M=; b=p3fheJjcHlBUMjKiWud+ZjL7LkV7U8sk5jR2oyx0NztzJLQJ5O9psAf9CjLOtfYvtWeP UYPYuvBzpVseG8H7VldU7qeEPsHgAIZU1mLsH6Fgd2vTv+1NO4pXMgNC5zSr3O+MQewD C6c8gijeiMzvxEMfoVG92gZZyFXK7yCJqe5zq8GUPALu9yVsPPxXMLSC2KZbXVogNNdB 0/OczsKaI+a0dLgVToUavCsFIWKjHpTpWKf3+wHDEdD0yIyHSyRgcJLwZqeiaTB8qBY4 keSco6Zjmoz+yg6SMISIYqCv5Lbda1Bxg7iEuJWgoXSO+ZsPlz41qIe2jgWWteZyMosa rA== Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t044vsa2t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:49 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388BXN1p012261; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:48 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3svhkkkhcv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:48 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 388DRlWI42270986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:47 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55E12004B; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B883920040; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bd3f974c-2712-11b2-a85c-df1cec4d728e.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.29.230]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:44 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: linuxppc-dev , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] powerpc/bpf: implement bpf_arch_text_copy Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:57:36 +0530 Message-ID: <20230908132740.718103-2-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: FfyXDLd91BvrXBzk7U5-v2IZiPLZ7YrK X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: FfyXDLd91BvrXBzk7U5-v2IZiPLZ7YrK X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.267,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.601,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-09-08_09,2023-09-05_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2309080121 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "Naveen N. Rao" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" bpf_arch_text_copy is used to dump JITed binary to RX page, allowing multiple BPF programs to share the same page. Use patch_instruction() to implement it. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 37043dfc1add..4f896222c579 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@ #include #include #include -#include +#include #include +#include +#include + #include "bpf_jit.h" static void bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns(void *area, unsigned int size) @@ -23,6 +26,28 @@ static void bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns(void *area, unsigned int size) memset32(area, BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION, size / 4); } +/* + * Patch 'len' bytes of instructions from opcode to addr, one instruction + * at a time. Returns addr on success. ERR_PTR(-EINVAL), otherwise. + */ +static void *bpf_patch_instructions(void *addr, void *opcode, size_t len, bool fill_insn) +{ + while (len > 0) { + ppc_inst_t insn = ppc_inst_read(opcode); + int ilen = ppc_inst_len(insn); + + if (patch_instruction(addr, insn)) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + len -= ilen; + addr = addr + ilen; + if (!fill_insn) + opcode = opcode + ilen; + } + + return addr; +} + int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr) { if (!exit_addr || is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4))) { @@ -274,3 +299,17 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct code ctx->exentry_idx++; return 0; } + +void *bpf_arch_text_copy(void *dst, void *src, size_t len) +{ + void *ret; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(core_kernel_text((unsigned long)dst))) + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + + mutex_lock(&text_mutex); + ret = bpf_patch_instructions(dst, src, len, false); + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); + + return ret; +} From patchwork Fri Sep 8 13:27:37 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1831544 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=bIx8G1aj; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxmy5Gvkz1yh5 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:30:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=bIx8G1aj; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rhxmy0GNyz3cTy for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:30:10 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=bIx8G1aj; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxkk16xLz2yD4 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:28:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353728.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388DKfva023951; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:53 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=e1pzRfIsQNWviwQZR119p94RiwEd51lnuBA/9kOUYQ8=; b=bIx8G1ajBo9Syc9MCJY0kaXaQGknXEkxzZrrrn79+JPkeMquYjTj6gWvslKMjGDiEks3 3usPYeVjA0MwCAE3JeKmF3Cj2LpKOabO/XiK+2hahosVPQcsx6jmJB/uEilgsBNHjTqi J6diEGRXhXxaLEXKfDWIIHhzKunPn7RUgLYN+3c3v9/rIS2Z93afuPPaceJsNu8/u0hV 2w/ImtHPnEy5qFcK5in76M4vomjUndIclkVv0Iqy5xIkaM3V3PpX/L4exi6yRT5NJSp9 U4Iuq/hARzX63tjFnULmd8Zzd7Y3ItyQBpWUnnUDfklYDZ0CHMATSrWRM7DvvAnLO1ZQ gA== Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t04dsg6f9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:52 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388DNKIl026759; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:51 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.226]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3svgcp3vwk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:51 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 388DRnSN5178062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:49 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803822004B; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4AF20040; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bd3f974c-2712-11b2-a85c-df1cec4d728e.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.29.230]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:47 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: linuxppc-dev , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] powerpc/bpf: implement bpf_arch_text_invalidate for bpf_prog_pack Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:57:37 +0530 Message-ID: <20230908132740.718103-3-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: lIud_GT87QPnqlLvPEp84QaNENWEjzhI X-Proofpoint-GUID: lIud_GT87QPnqlLvPEp84QaNENWEjzhI X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.267,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.601,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-09-08_09,2023-09-05_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=893 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2309080121 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "Naveen N. Rao" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Implement bpf_arch_text_invalidate and use it to fill unused part of the bpf_prog_pack with trap instructions when a BPF program is freed. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 4f896222c579..c0036eb171f0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -313,3 +313,18 @@ void *bpf_arch_text_copy(void *dst, void *src, size_t len) return ret; } + +int bpf_arch_text_invalidate(void *dst, size_t len) +{ + u32 insn = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; + void *ret; + + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(core_kernel_text((unsigned long)dst))) + return -EINVAL; + + mutex_lock(&text_mutex); + ret = bpf_patch_instructions(dst, &insn, len, true); + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); + + return IS_ERR(ret) ? PTR_ERR(ret) : 0; +} From patchwork Fri Sep 8 13:27:38 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1831545 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WCguzcAG; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxnt0fnNz1yh5 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:30:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WCguzcAG; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rhxns5wcZz3dDG for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:30:57 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=WCguzcAG; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxkm2Fm8z2yD4 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:28:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388DMlDQ031939; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:55 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=VgGW3qf4bExchP2MghMgT9I7KFMQ/qeDnrk4vfKcjrU=; b=WCguzcAG1UfDiYY/7axSrkOcH3iafYnjk9PDbo0dWFf1VDnAHXQ+rGlIhYPW3I/2Pf2O YbuZ3rpWvcQHLPmr3xm0eiddePnzlLiFCakSIn0BPbMpKUmtdhgFk6kCSyCF0tkgZrHK yW9MLdiNr0RUibL4UjKXzeOoZsYSNkbEvGABu+IIAcxPxZdbJYzCFiMoYKQC3iwLH9zR 73FIy7FHCdQoI/TIY5QoZTI56TfHCA2a0oaB+SZU3CpOmZd27Rmy0piuiRm958cU9jdc iROevX3mCsbMiBD3IOA7q4QOUpgN40KUC/q58nDzXqdqPAAJjm20SLlAQwNuNBnTW5F5 1w== Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t04es84de-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:55 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388CcvQE021441; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.229]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3svfs042xf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay07.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 388DRqEt63504662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:52 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2422120049; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF13A20040; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bd3f974c-2712-11b2-a85c-df1cec4d728e.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.29.230]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:49 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: linuxppc-dev , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] powerpc/bpf: use bpf_jit_binary_pack_[alloc|finalize|free] Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:57:38 +0530 Message-ID: <20230908132740.718103-4-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: aBHqeBPqSBXq5JS31w2qACSN9O7cccbi X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: aBHqeBPqSBXq5JS31w2qACSN9O7cccbi X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.267,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.601,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-09-08_09,2023-09-05_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2309080121 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "Naveen N. Rao" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc in powerpc jit. The jit engine first writes the program to the rw buffer. When the jit is done, the program is copied to the final location with bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize. With multiple jit_subprogs, bpf_jit_free is called on some subprograms that haven't got bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize() yet. Implement custom bpf_jit_free() like in commit 1d5f82d9dd47 ("bpf, x86: fix freeing of not-finalized bpf_prog_pack") to call bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(), if necessary. While here, correct the misnomer powerpc64_jit_data to powerpc_jit_data as it is meant for both ppc32 and ppc64. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h | 12 ++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c | 13 ++-- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 10 +-- 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h index 72b7bb34fade..02bd89aa8ea5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit.h @@ -36,9 +36,6 @@ EMIT(PPC_RAW_BRANCH(offset)); \ } while (0) -/* bl (unconditional 'branch' with link) */ -#define PPC_BL(dest) EMIT(PPC_RAW_BL((dest) - (unsigned long)(image + ctx->idx))) - /* "cond" here covers BO:BI fields. */ #define PPC_BCC_SHORT(cond, dest) \ do { \ @@ -169,16 +166,17 @@ static inline void bpf_clear_seen_register(struct codegen_context *ctx, int i) } void bpf_jit_init_reg_mapping(struct codegen_context *ctx); -int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func); -int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, +int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func); +int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs, int pass, bool extra_pass); void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx); void bpf_jit_realloc_regs(struct codegen_context *ctx); int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr); -int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct codegen_context *ctx, - int insn_idx, int jmp_off, int dst_reg); +int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass, + struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx, + int jmp_off, int dst_reg); #endif diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index c0036eb171f0..c89ff34504a1 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -64,10 +64,13 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, return 0; } -struct powerpc64_jit_data { - struct bpf_binary_header *header; +struct powerpc_jit_data { + /* address of rw header */ + struct bpf_binary_header *hdr; + /* address of ro final header */ + struct bpf_binary_header *fhdr; u32 *addrs; - u8 *image; + u8 *fimage; u32 proglen; struct codegen_context ctx; }; @@ -84,15 +87,18 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) u8 *image = NULL; u32 *code_base; u32 *addrs; - struct powerpc64_jit_data *jit_data; + struct powerpc_jit_data *jit_data; struct codegen_context cgctx; int pass; int flen; - struct bpf_binary_header *bpf_hdr; + struct bpf_binary_header *fhdr = NULL; + struct bpf_binary_header *hdr = NULL; struct bpf_prog *org_fp = fp; struct bpf_prog *tmp_fp; bool bpf_blinded = false; bool extra_pass = false; + u8 *fimage = NULL; + u32 *fcode_base; u32 extable_len; u32 fixup_len; @@ -122,9 +128,16 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) addrs = jit_data->addrs; if (addrs) { cgctx = jit_data->ctx; - image = jit_data->image; - bpf_hdr = jit_data->header; + /* + * JIT compiled to a writable location (image/code_base) first. + * It is then moved to the readonly final location (fimage/fcode_base) + * using instruction patching. + */ + fimage = jit_data->fimage; + fhdr = jit_data->fhdr; proglen = jit_data->proglen; + hdr = jit_data->hdr; + image = (void *)hdr + ((void *)fimage - (void *)fhdr); extra_pass = true; /* During extra pass, ensure index is reset before repopulating extable entries */ cgctx.exentry_idx = 0; @@ -144,7 +157,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) cgctx.stack_size = round_up(fp->aux->stack_depth, 16); /* Scouting faux-generate pass 0 */ - if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) { + if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, NULL, NULL, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) { /* We hit something illegal or unsupported. */ fp = org_fp; goto out_addrs; @@ -159,7 +172,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) */ if (cgctx.seen & SEEN_TAILCALL || !is_offset_in_branch_range((long)cgctx.idx * 4)) { cgctx.idx = 0; - if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, 0, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) { + if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, NULL, NULL, &cgctx, addrs, 0, false)) { fp = org_fp; goto out_addrs; } @@ -181,17 +194,19 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) proglen = cgctx.idx * 4; alloclen = proglen + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + fixup_len + extable_len; - bpf_hdr = bpf_jit_binary_alloc(alloclen, &image, 4, bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns); - if (!bpf_hdr) { + fhdr = bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc(alloclen, &fimage, 4, &hdr, &image, + bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns); + if (!fhdr) { fp = org_fp; goto out_addrs; } if (extable_len) - fp->aux->extable = (void *)image + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + proglen + fixup_len; + fp->aux->extable = (void *)fimage + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE + proglen + fixup_len; skip_init_ctx: code_base = (u32 *)(image + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE); + fcode_base = (u32 *)(fimage + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE); /* Code generation passes 1-2 */ for (pass = 1; pass < 3; pass++) { @@ -199,8 +214,10 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) cgctx.idx = 0; cgctx.alt_exit_addr = 0; bpf_jit_build_prologue(code_base, &cgctx); - if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, &cgctx, addrs, pass, extra_pass)) { - bpf_jit_binary_free(bpf_hdr); + if (bpf_jit_build_body(fp, code_base, fcode_base, &cgctx, addrs, pass, + extra_pass)) { + bpf_arch_text_copy(&fhdr->size, &hdr->size, sizeof(hdr->size)); + bpf_jit_binary_pack_free(fhdr, hdr); fp = org_fp; goto out_addrs; } @@ -220,17 +237,19 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V1 /* Function descriptor nastiness: Address + TOC */ - ((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)code_base; + ((u64 *)image)[0] = (u64)fcode_base; ((u64 *)image)[1] = local_paca->kernel_toc; #endif - fp->bpf_func = (void *)image; + fp->bpf_func = (void *)fimage; fp->jited = 1; fp->jited_len = proglen + FUNCTION_DESCR_SIZE; - bpf_flush_icache(bpf_hdr, (u8 *)bpf_hdr + bpf_hdr->size); if (!fp->is_func || extra_pass) { - bpf_jit_binary_lock_ro(bpf_hdr); + if (bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(fp, fhdr, hdr)) { + fp = org_fp; + goto out_addrs; + } bpf_prog_fill_jited_linfo(fp, addrs); out_addrs: kfree(addrs); @@ -240,8 +259,9 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) jit_data->addrs = addrs; jit_data->ctx = cgctx; jit_data->proglen = proglen; - jit_data->image = image; - jit_data->header = bpf_hdr; + jit_data->fimage = fimage; + jit_data->fhdr = fhdr; + jit_data->hdr = hdr; } out: @@ -255,12 +275,13 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *fp) * The caller should check for (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) before calling * this function, as this only applies to BPF_PROBE_MEM, for now. */ -int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct codegen_context *ctx, - int insn_idx, int jmp_off, int dst_reg) +int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass, + struct codegen_context *ctx, int insn_idx, int jmp_off, + int dst_reg) { off_t offset; unsigned long pc; - struct exception_table_entry *ex; + struct exception_table_entry *ex, *ex_entry; u32 *fixup; /* Populate extable entries only in the last pass */ @@ -271,9 +292,16 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct code WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->exentry_idx >= fp->aux->num_exentries)) return -EINVAL; + /* + * Program is first written to image before copying to the + * final location (fimage). Accordingly, update in the image first. + * As all offsets used are relative, copying as is to the + * final location should be alright. + */ pc = (unsigned long)&image[insn_idx]; + ex = (void *)fp->aux->extable - (void *)fimage + (void *)image; - fixup = (void *)fp->aux->extable - + fixup = (void *)ex - (fp->aux->num_exentries * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4) + (ctx->exentry_idx * BPF_FIXUP_LEN * 4); @@ -284,17 +312,17 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, int pass, struct code fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1] = PPC_RAW_BRANCH((long)(pc + jmp_off) - (long)&fixup[BPF_FIXUP_LEN - 1]); - ex = &fp->aux->extable[ctx->exentry_idx]; + ex_entry = &ex[ctx->exentry_idx]; - offset = pc - (long)&ex->insn; + offset = pc - (long)&ex_entry->insn; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset >= 0 || offset < INT_MIN)) return -ERANGE; - ex->insn = offset; + ex_entry->insn = offset; - offset = (long)fixup - (long)&ex->fixup; + offset = (long)fixup - (long)&ex_entry->fixup; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(offset >= 0 || offset < INT_MIN)) return -ERANGE; - ex->fixup = offset; + ex_entry->fixup = offset; ctx->exentry_idx++; return 0; @@ -328,3 +356,27 @@ int bpf_arch_text_invalidate(void *dst, size_t len) return IS_ERR(ret) ? PTR_ERR(ret) : 0; } + +void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *fp) +{ + if (fp->jited) { + struct powerpc_jit_data *jit_data = fp->aux->jit_data; + struct bpf_binary_header *hdr; + + /* + * If we fail the final pass of JIT (from jit_subprogs), + * the program may not be finalized yet. Call finalize here + * before freeing it. + */ + if (jit_data) { + bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize(fp, jit_data->fhdr, jit_data->hdr); + kvfree(jit_data->addrs); + kfree(jit_data); + } + hdr = bpf_jit_binary_pack_hdr(fp); + bpf_jit_binary_pack_free(hdr, NULL); + WARN_ON_ONCE(!bpf_prog_kallsyms_verify_off(fp)); + } + + bpf_prog_unlock_free(fp); +} diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c index 7f91ea064c08..434417c755fd 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp32.c @@ -200,12 +200,13 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx) EMIT(PPC_RAW_BLR()); } -int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) +/* Relative offset needs to be calculated based on final image location */ +int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) { - s32 rel = (s32)func - (s32)(image + ctx->idx); + s32 rel = (s32)func - (s32)(fimage + ctx->idx); if (image && rel < 0x2000000 && rel >= -0x2000000) { - PPC_BL(func); + EMIT(PPC_RAW_BL(rel)); } else { /* Load function address into r0 */ EMIT(PPC_RAW_LIS(_R0, IMM_H(func))); @@ -278,7 +279,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_tail_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 o } /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue */ -int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, +int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs, int pass, bool extra_pass) { const struct bpf_insn *insn = fp->insnsi; @@ -997,7 +998,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * jmp_off += 4; } - ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, pass, ctx, insn_idx, + ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx, insn_idx, jmp_off, dst_reg); if (ret) return ret; @@ -1053,7 +1054,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * EMIT(PPC_RAW_STW(bpf_to_ppc(BPF_REG_5), _R1, 12)); } - ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr); if (ret) return ret; diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 0f8048f6dad6..79f23974a320 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ static int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u return 0; } -int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) +int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func) { unsigned int i, ctx_idx = ctx->idx; @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ asm ( ); /* Assemble the body code between the prologue & epilogue */ -int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, +int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u32 *addrs, int pass, bool extra_pass) { enum stf_barrier_type stf_barrier = stf_barrier_type_get(); @@ -940,8 +940,8 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * addrs[++i] = ctx->idx * 4; if (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) { - ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, pass, ctx, ctx->idx - 1, - 4, dst_reg); + ret = bpf_add_extable_entry(fp, image, fimage, pass, ctx, + ctx->idx - 1, 4, dst_reg); if (ret) return ret; } @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, struct codegen_context * if (func_addr_fixed) ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_hlp(image, ctx, func_addr); else - ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, ctx, func_addr); + ret = bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(image, fimage, ctx, func_addr); if (ret) return ret; From patchwork Fri Sep 8 13:27:39 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1831546 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=tW9sDS8F; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxpq69qJz1yh5 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:31:47 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=tW9sDS8F; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rhxpq3lx0z3dHm for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:31:47 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=tW9sDS8F; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxkp3168z3c4s for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:28:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353723.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388DMGwx004926; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:58 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=UZEd8+YCglfM3/F3LtFpJaUhBqLI+b8upZY92+tzIpg=; b=tW9sDS8FwsjORjdx21wRqQfbG/cU6m6inz+ctBricmzchuTxnwLpxB1wQVdSyMVHv9lQ 2NBruN6J4iQd3UAf7A2pnODrlVNaBqatcZ9Biv+FNS/9xXsBts7sem2yaJgl8ceI6Zk3 DPFXfDMfbb9WBic93NzHgn4/CQxYnfWhMJX7um7TYLi1UsYVi4sptBbyy+ZfgvcatRn4 v6ovcsZhJMHCgetQFr/vnKMg+kDjakvNtL3vKS9hwQj8+iOZS2P+LXNABV9Aob/I6esk WxU8acCeru/KLy4nbtTS3doUKiupgh2KaNatTa2Z5eFFPHIrqWBeFqwZZ4HAKO4gWLkp KA== Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t04ehg3ry-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:58 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388DKq3j021422; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:57 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3svfs042xm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:57 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 388DRsis42795642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:55 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41EF20049; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8305420040; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bd3f974c-2712-11b2-a85c-df1cec4d728e.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.29.230]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: linuxppc-dev , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] powerpc/code-patching: introduce patch_instructions() Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:57:39 +0530 Message-ID: <20230908132740.718103-5-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: BQprlj5R5aQ83-MoxQASemevksduR0Tu X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: BQprlj5R5aQ83-MoxQASemevksduR0Tu X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.267,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.601,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-09-08_09,2023-09-05_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=687 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2309080121 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "Naveen N. Rao" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" patch_instruction() entails setting up pte, patching the instruction, clearing the pte and flushing the tlb. If multiple instructions need to be patched, every instruction would have to go through the above drill unnecessarily. Instead, introduce function patch_instructions() that sets up the pte, clears the pte and flushes the tlb only once per page range of instructions to be patched. This adds a slight overhead to patch_instruction() call while improving the patching time for scenarios where more than one instruction needs to be patched. Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h | 1 + arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h index 3f881548fb61..4f5f0c091586 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/code-patching.h @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ int create_cond_branch(ppc_inst_t *instr, const u32 *addr, int patch_branch(u32 *addr, unsigned long target, int flags); int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr); int raw_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr); +int patch_instructions(void *addr, void *code, size_t len, bool fill_insn); static inline unsigned long patch_site_addr(s32 *site) { diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c index b00112d7ad46..60d446e16b42 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/code-patching.c @@ -278,20 +278,25 @@ static void unmap_patch_area(unsigned long addr) flush_tlb_kernel_range(addr, addr + PAGE_SIZE); } -static int __do_patch_instruction_mm(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) +/* + * A page is mapped and instructions that fit the page are patched. + * Assumes 'len' to be (PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(addr)) or below. + */ +static int __do_patch_instructions_mm(u32 *addr, void *code, size_t len, bool fill_insn) { - int err; - u32 *patch_addr; unsigned long text_poke_addr; pte_t *pte; unsigned long pfn = get_patch_pfn(addr); struct mm_struct *patching_mm; struct mm_struct *orig_mm; + ppc_inst_t instr; + void *patch_addr; spinlock_t *ptl; + int ilen, err; patching_mm = __this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_context.mm); text_poke_addr = __this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_context.addr); - patch_addr = (u32 *)(text_poke_addr + offset_in_page(addr)); + patch_addr = (void *)(text_poke_addr + offset_in_page(addr)); pte = get_locked_pte(patching_mm, text_poke_addr, &ptl); if (!pte) @@ -307,11 +312,22 @@ static int __do_patch_instruction_mm(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) orig_mm = start_using_temp_mm(patching_mm); - err = __patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr); + while (len > 0) { + instr = ppc_inst_read(code); + ilen = ppc_inst_len(instr); + err = __patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr); + /* hwsync performed by __patch_instruction (sync) if successful */ + if (err) { + mb(); /* sync */ + break; + } - /* hwsync performed by __patch_instruction (sync) if successful */ - if (err) - mb(); /* sync */ + len -= ilen; + patch_addr = patch_addr + ilen; + addr = (void *)addr + ilen; + if (!fill_insn) + code = code + ilen; + } /* context synchronisation performed by __patch_instruction (isync or exception) */ stop_using_temp_mm(patching_mm, orig_mm); @@ -328,16 +344,21 @@ static int __do_patch_instruction_mm(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) return err; } -static int __do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) +/* + * A page is mapped and instructions that fit the page are patched. + * Assumes 'len' to be (PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(addr)) or below. + */ +static int __do_patch_instructions(u32 *addr, void *code, size_t len, bool fill_insn) { - int err; - u32 *patch_addr; unsigned long text_poke_addr; pte_t *pte; unsigned long pfn = get_patch_pfn(addr); + void *patch_addr; + ppc_inst_t instr; + int ilen, err; text_poke_addr = (unsigned long)__this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_context.addr) & PAGE_MASK; - patch_addr = (u32 *)(text_poke_addr + offset_in_page(addr)); + patch_addr = (void *)(text_poke_addr + offset_in_page(addr)); pte = __this_cpu_read(cpu_patching_context.pte); __set_pte_at(&init_mm, text_poke_addr, pte, pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_KERNEL), 0); @@ -345,7 +366,19 @@ static int __do_patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) if (radix_enabled()) asm volatile("ptesync": : :"memory"); - err = __patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr); + while (len > 0) { + instr = ppc_inst_read(code); + ilen = ppc_inst_len(instr); + err = __patch_instruction(addr, instr, patch_addr); + if (err) + break; + + len -= ilen; + patch_addr = patch_addr + ilen; + addr = (void *)addr + ilen; + if (!fill_insn) + code = code + ilen; + } pte_clear(&init_mm, text_poke_addr, pte); flush_tlb_kernel_range(text_poke_addr, text_poke_addr + PAGE_SIZE); @@ -369,15 +402,46 @@ int patch_instruction(u32 *addr, ppc_inst_t instr) local_irq_save(flags); if (mm_patch_enabled()) - err = __do_patch_instruction_mm(addr, instr); + err = __do_patch_instructions_mm(addr, &instr, ppc_inst_len(instr), false); else - err = __do_patch_instruction(addr, instr); + err = __do_patch_instructions(addr, &instr, ppc_inst_len(instr), false); local_irq_restore(flags); return err; } NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_instruction); +/* + * Patch 'addr' with 'len' bytes of instructions from 'code'. + */ +int patch_instructions(void *addr, void *code, size_t len, bool fill_insn) +{ + unsigned long flags; + size_t plen; + int err; + + while (len > 0) { + plen = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(addr), len); + + local_irq_save(flags); + if (mm_patch_enabled()) + err = __do_patch_instructions_mm(addr, code, plen, fill_insn); + else + err = __do_patch_instructions(addr, code, plen, fill_insn); + local_irq_restore(flags); + if (err) + break; + + len -= plen; + addr = addr + plen; + if (!fill_insn) + code = code + plen; + } + + return err; +} +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(patch_instructions); + int patch_branch(u32 *addr, unsigned long target, int flags) { ppc_inst_t instr; From patchwork Fri Sep 8 13:27:40 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hari Bathini X-Patchwork-Id: 1831547 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=YSP9o9FC; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxqm3cL6z1yh5 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:32:36 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=YSP9o9FC; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rhxqm2TcFz3dRG for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:32:36 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=YSP9o9FC; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=hbathini@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rhxkq719Vz3c7s for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 23:28:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353722.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388D8ftf004868; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:28:01 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=xtWIABgiVrD0T5myOpr++O1iK45Hp5XBO9XdOGCmMt4=; b=YSP9o9FCR/sZdow8ZkHfHnOfmxKF77z0UTbXlbJbQXpv9Ux1ytd2MNuHt4fqbpnMoBLx 9RyryqUZwQYzjTTTNHCB6UZm0AQ3BuxkXywfYLki8T5TujPX/kxbvKvSG40s+2Jb1YVj Dl82JERPunZfVDsam8VOM+jpdLrFsvTxi6/DxSzKfGj2d/DEDe3ds0hBLvQ0lbUYzRaG 46NQMduVXcOV8KAJJ9+ieZgBD5XuGvnLFxVMoBdOxBQlpBTZ16r+LhUVcEIiILw/pW2c rwUrb9lOH5495feAif/Ls6KFyPWtaH8obF1FExKDkheQdnNqRUyo+TGQuLqJD/WiQVSR 3A== Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3t03yyru5e-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:28:00 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 388BJuum006625; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:59 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3svgvm3nyv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Sep 2023 13:27:59 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 388DRv9t23003698 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:57 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6260520049; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D53920040; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-bd3f974c-2712-11b2-a85c-df1cec4d728e.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.43.29.230]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Sep 2023 13:27:54 +0000 (GMT) From: Hari Bathini To: linuxppc-dev , bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/bpf: use patch_instructions() Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:57:40 +0530 Message-ID: <20230908132740.718103-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230908132740.718103-1-hbathini@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: JgllrVCUwflaJkgdZgKicC0TDJtVU2ID X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: JgllrVCUwflaJkgdZgKicC0TDJtVU2ID X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.267,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.601,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-09-08_09,2023-09-05_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=850 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2308100000 definitions=main-2309080121 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Song Liu , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "Naveen N. Rao" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Use the newly introduced patch_instructions() that handles patching multiple instructions with one call. This improves speed of exectution for JIT'ing bpf programs. Without this patch (on a POWER9 lpar): # time modprobe test_bpf real 2m59.681s user 0m0.000s sys 1m44.160s # With this patch (on a POWER9 lpar): # time modprobe test_bpf real 0m5.013s user 0m0.000s sys 0m4.216s # Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini --- arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 34 ++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index c89ff34504a1..1e5000d18321 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -26,28 +26,6 @@ static void bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns(void *area, unsigned int size) memset32(area, BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION, size / 4); } -/* - * Patch 'len' bytes of instructions from opcode to addr, one instruction - * at a time. Returns addr on success. ERR_PTR(-EINVAL), otherwise. - */ -static void *bpf_patch_instructions(void *addr, void *opcode, size_t len, bool fill_insn) -{ - while (len > 0) { - ppc_inst_t insn = ppc_inst_read(opcode); - int ilen = ppc_inst_len(insn); - - if (patch_instruction(addr, insn)) - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - - len -= ilen; - addr = addr + ilen; - if (!fill_insn) - opcode = opcode + ilen; - } - - return addr; -} - int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr) { if (!exit_addr || is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4))) { @@ -330,31 +308,31 @@ int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass void *bpf_arch_text_copy(void *dst, void *src, size_t len) { - void *ret; + int err; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(core_kernel_text((unsigned long)dst))) return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); mutex_lock(&text_mutex); - ret = bpf_patch_instructions(dst, src, len, false); + err = patch_instructions(dst, src, len, false); mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); - return ret; + return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : dst; } int bpf_arch_text_invalidate(void *dst, size_t len) { u32 insn = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION; - void *ret; + int ret; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(core_kernel_text((unsigned long)dst))) return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&text_mutex); - ret = bpf_patch_instructions(dst, &insn, len, true); + ret = patch_instructions(dst, &insn, len, true); mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); - return IS_ERR(ret) ? PTR_ERR(ret) : 0; + return ret; } void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)