From patchwork Wed Jun 22 17:19:43 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1646651 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LSqtM0RBcz9sG2 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2022 03:21:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60938 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o442i-0003to-Ob for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:21:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o441g-0003tB-LZ; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:20:24 -0400 Received: from [187.72.171.209] (port=48553 helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o441e-0007kU-43; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:20:24 -0400 Received: from p9ibm ([10.10.71.235]) by outlook.eldorado.org.br over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:20:14 -0300 Received: from eldorado.org.br (unknown [10.10.70.45]) by p9ibm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B410B8000AD; Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:20:13 -0300 (-03) From: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: clg@kaod.org, danielhb413@gmail.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, groug@kaod.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br, mst@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, farosas@linux.ibm.com Subject: [RFC PATCH] target/ppc: Implement hashst(p) and hashchk(p) instructions Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:19:43 -0300 Message-Id: <20220622171943.90786-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2022 17:20:14.0009 (UTC) FILETIME=[55AF3A90:01D8865C] X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 187.72.171.209 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=187.72.171.209; envelope-from=victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br; helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Implementation for instructions hashst, hashchk, and its privileged versions. It was decided to implement the hash algorithm from ground up in this patch exactly as described in Power ISA. Signed-off-by: VĂ­ctor Colombo --- RFC because I need some feedback on if the approach of implementing the algorithm is a good idea. Also, it seems that the kernel/kvm are not implementing the necessary registers? What do you think about the choice to implement the hash algorithm from the ground up, following the SIMON-like algorithm presented in Power ISA? IIUC, this algorithm is not the same as the original[1]. Other options would be to use other algorithm already implemented in QEMU, or even make this instruction a nop for all Power versions. Based-on: ppc-next, with <20220620210540.112153-1-leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br> and <20220615192006.3075821-1-lucas.coutinho@eldorado.org.br> applied on top. The relevant patches are: [PATCH 01/11] target/ppc: receive DisasContext explicitly in GEN_PRIV [PATCH 02/11] target/ppc: add macros to check privilege level [1] https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/404.pdf --- linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h | 3 + target/ppc/cpu.h | 2 + target/ppc/cpu_init.c | 7 ++ target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++ target/ppc/helper.h | 4 ++ target/ppc/insn32.decode | 10 +++ target/ppc/translate.c | 5 ++ target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc | 34 +++++++++ 8 files changed, 147 insertions(+) diff --git a/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h b/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h index 9f18fa090f..4ae4718143 100644 --- a/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h +++ b/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h @@ -646,6 +646,9 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char { #define KVM_REG_PPC_SIER3 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc3) #define KVM_REG_PPC_DAWR1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc4) #define KVM_REG_PPC_DAWRX1 (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0xc5) +/* FIXME: KVM hasn't exposed these registers yet */ +#define KVM_REG_PPC_HASHKEYR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x00) +#define KVM_REG_PPC_HASHPKEYR (KVM_REG_PPC | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | 0x00) /* Transactional Memory checkpointed state: * This is all GPRs, all VSX regs and a subset of SPRs diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h index 6d78078f37..d982b779ca 100644 --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h @@ -1665,6 +1665,8 @@ void ppc_compat_add_property(Object *obj, const char *name, #define SPR_BOOKE_GIVOR14 (0x1BD) #define SPR_TIR (0x1BE) #define SPR_PTCR (0x1D0) +#define SPR_POWER_HASHKEYR (0x1D4) +#define SPR_POWER_HASHPKEYR (0x1D5) #define SPR_BOOKE_SPEFSCR (0x200) #define SPR_Exxx_BBEAR (0x201) #define SPR_Exxx_BBTAR (0x202) diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c index b802bbb641..3ec9e4a27f 100644 --- a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c +++ b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c @@ -6484,6 +6484,13 @@ static void init_proc_POWER10(CPUPPCState *env) spr_read_generic, spr_write_generic, KVM_REG_PPC_PSSCR, 0); + spr_register_kvm(env, SPR_POWER_HASHKEYR, "HASHPKEYR", + SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS, &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic, + KVM_REG_PPC_HASHKEYR, 0x0); + spr_register_kvm(env, SPR_POWER_HASHPKEYR, "HASHPKEYR", + SPR_NOACCESS, SPR_NOACCESS, &spr_read_generic, &spr_write_generic, + KVM_REG_PPC_HASHPKEYR, 0x0); + /* env variables */ env->dcache_line_size = 128; env->icache_line_size = 128; diff --git a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c index cb752b184a..0998e8374e 100644 --- a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c @@ -2174,6 +2174,88 @@ void helper_td(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong arg1, target_ulong arg2, #endif #endif +static uint32_t helper_SIMON_LIKE_32_64(uint32_t x, uint64_t key, uint32_t lane) +{ + const uint16_t c = 0xfffc; + const uint64_t z0 = 0xfa2561cdf44ac398ULL; + uint16_t z = 0, temp; + uint16_t k[32], eff_k[32], xleft[33], xright[33], fxleft[32]; + + for (int i = 3; i >= 0; i--) { + k[i] = key & 0xffff; + key >>= 16; + } + xleft[0] = x & 0xffff; + xright[0] = (x >> 16) & 0xffff; + + for (int i = 0; i < 28; i++) { + z = (z0 >> (63 - i)) & 1; + temp = ror16(k[i + 3], 3) ^ k[i + 1]; + k[i + 4] = c ^ z ^ k[i] ^ temp ^ ror16(temp, 1); + } + + for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) { + eff_k[4 * i + 0] = k[4 * i + ((0 + lane) % 4)]; + eff_k[4 * i + 1] = k[4 * i + ((1 + lane) % 4)]; + eff_k[4 * i + 2] = k[4 * i + ((2 + lane) % 4)]; + eff_k[4 * i + 3] = k[4 * i + ((3 + lane) % 4)]; + } + + for (int i = 0; i < 32; i++) { + fxleft[i] = (rol16(xleft[i], 1) & + rol16(xleft[i], 8)) ^ rol16(xleft[i], 2); + xleft[i + 1] = xright[i] ^ fxleft[i] ^ eff_k[i]; + xright[i + 1] = xleft[i]; + } + + return (((uint32_t)xright[32]) << 16) | xleft[32]; +} + +static uint64_t hash_digest(uint64_t ra, uint64_t rb, uint64_t key) +{ + uint64_t stage0_h = 0ULL, stage0_l = 0ULL; + uint64_t stage1_h, stage1_l; + + for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) { + stage0_h |= ror64(rb & 0xff, 8 * (2 * i + 1)); + stage0_h |= ((ra >> 32) & 0xff) << (8 * 2 * i); + stage0_l |= ror64((rb >> 32) & 0xff, 8 * (2 * i + 1)); + stage0_l |= (ra & 0xff) << (8 * 2 * i); + rb >>= 8; + ra >>= 8; + } + + stage1_h = (uint64_t)helper_SIMON_LIKE_32_64(stage0_h >> 32, key, 0) << 32; + stage1_h |= helper_SIMON_LIKE_32_64(stage0_h, key, 1); + stage1_l = (uint64_t)helper_SIMON_LIKE_32_64(stage0_l >> 32, key, 2) << 32; + stage1_l |= helper_SIMON_LIKE_32_64(stage0_l, key, 3); + + return stage1_h ^ stage1_l; +} + +#define HELPER_HASH(op, key, store) \ +void helper_##op(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong ea, target_ulong ra, \ + target_ulong rb) \ +{ \ + uint64_t chash = hash_digest(ra, rb, key), lhash; \ + \ + if (store) { \ + cpu_stq_data_ra(env, ea, chash, GETPC()); \ + } else { \ + lhash = cpu_ldq_data_ra(env, ea, GETPC()); \ + if (lhash != chash) { \ + /* hashes don't match, trap */ \ + raise_exception_err_ra(env, POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM, \ + POWERPC_EXCP_TRAP, GETPC()); \ + } \ + } \ +} + +HELPER_HASH(HASHST, env->spr[SPR_POWER_HASHKEYR], true) +HELPER_HASH(HASHCHK, env->spr[SPR_POWER_HASHKEYR], false) +HELPER_HASH(HASHSTP, env->spr[SPR_POWER_HASHPKEYR], true) +HELPER_HASH(HASHCHKP, env->spr[SPR_POWER_HASHPKEYR], false) + #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) #ifdef CONFIG_TCG diff --git a/target/ppc/helper.h b/target/ppc/helper.h index 4287f41880..c7ff3eb169 100644 --- a/target/ppc/helper.h +++ b/target/ppc/helper.h @@ -4,6 +4,10 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(tw, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, tl, i32) #if defined(TARGET_PPC64) DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(td, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, tl, i32) #endif +DEF_HELPER_4(HASHST, void, env, tl, tl, tl) +DEF_HELPER_4(HASHCHK, void, env, tl, tl, tl) +DEF_HELPER_4(HASHSTP, void, env, tl, tl, tl) +DEF_HELPER_4(HASHCHKP, void, env, tl, tl, tl) #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) DEF_HELPER_2(store_msr, void, env, tl) DEF_HELPER_1(rfi, void, env) diff --git a/target/ppc/insn32.decode b/target/ppc/insn32.decode index b36a093828..e0fc9ecb7f 100644 --- a/target/ppc/insn32.decode +++ b/target/ppc/insn32.decode @@ -157,6 +157,9 @@ @X_TSX ...... ..... ra:5 rb:5 .......... . &X rt=%x_rt_tsx @X_TSXP ...... ..... ra:5 rb:5 .......... . &X rt=%rt_tsxp +%x_dw 0:1 21:5 !function=dw_compose_ea +@X_DW ...... ..... ra:5 rb:5 .......... . &X rt=%x_dw + &X_frtp_vrb frtp vrb @X_frtp_vrb ...... ....0 ..... vrb:5 .......... . &X_frtp_vrb frtp=%x_frtp @@ -308,6 +311,13 @@ CNTTZDM 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1000111011 - @X PDEPD 011111 ..... ..... ..... 0010011100 - @X PEXTD 011111 ..... ..... ..... 0010111100 - @X +# Fixed-Point Hash Instructions + +HASHST 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1011010010 . @X_DW +HASHCHK 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1011110010 . @X_DW +HASHSTP 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1010010010 . @X_DW +HASHCHKP 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1010110010 . @X_DW + ### Float-Point Load Instructions LFS 110000 ..... ..... ................ @D diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c index a918575fa9..c870bbedad 100644 --- a/target/ppc/translate.c +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c @@ -6410,6 +6410,11 @@ static int times_16(DisasContext *ctx, int x) return x * 16; } +static int64_t dw_compose_ea(DisasContext *ctx, int x) +{ + return deposit64(0xfffffffffffffe00, 3, 6, x); +} + /* * Helpers for trans_* functions to check for specific insns flags. * Use token pasting to ensure that we use the proper flag with the diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc index 77d449c3cd..d0a8269ea6 100644 --- a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc +++ b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc @@ -489,3 +489,37 @@ static bool trans_PEXTD(DisasContext *ctx, arg_X *a) #endif return true; } + +static bool do_hash(DisasContext *ctx, arg_X *a, bool priv, + void (*helper)(TCGv_ptr, TCGv, TCGv, TCGv)) +{ + TCGv ea; + + if (!(ctx->insns_flags2 & PPC2_ISA310)) { + /* if version is before v3.1, this operation is a nop */ + return true; + } + + if (priv) { + /* if instruction is privileged but the context is in user space */ + REQUIRE_SV(ctx); + } + + if (unlikely(a->ra == 0)) { + /* if RA=0, the instruction form is invalid */ + gen_invalid(ctx); + return true; + } + + ea = do_ea_calc(ctx, a->ra, tcg_constant_tl(a->rt)); + helper(cpu_env, ea, cpu_gpr[a->ra], cpu_gpr[a->rb]); + + tcg_temp_free(ea); + + return true; +} + +TRANS(HASHST, do_hash, false, gen_helper_HASHST) +TRANS(HASHCHK, do_hash, false, gen_helper_HASHCHK) +TRANS(HASHSTP, do_hash, true, gen_helper_HASHSTP) +TRANS(HASHCHKP, do_hash, true, gen_helper_HASHCHKP)