From patchwork Thu Jan 27 16:42:49 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Steven Rostedt X-Patchwork-Id: 1585211 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2:0:216:3eff:fee1:b9f1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jl5xS0w9Fz9tk1 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 03:43:07 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Jl5xR5kCsz3c7f for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 03:43:07 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=2604:1380:4641:c500::1; helo=dfw.source.kernel.org; envelope-from=srs0=3nbw=sl=goodmis.org=rostedt@kernel.org; receiver=) Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Jl5xF2GFKz30Nx for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 03:42:57 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A638618CE; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5836AC340E4; Thu, 27 Jan 2022 16:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:42:49 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: LKML Subject: [PATCH] ftrace: Have architectures opt-in for mcount build time sorting Message-ID: <20220127114249.03b1b52b@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Kees Cook , Russell King , Ard Biesheuvel , Sachin Sant , Andrew Morton , Yinan Liu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: "Steven Rostedt (Google)" First S390 complained that the sorting of the mcount sections at build time caused the kernel to crash on their architecture. Now PowerPC is complaining about it too. And also ARM64 appears to be having issues. It may be necessary to also update the relocation table for the values in the mcount table. Not only do we have to sort the table, but also update the relocations that may be applied to the items in the table. If the system is not relocatable, then it is fine to sort, but if it is, some architectures may have issues (although x86 does not as it shifts all addresses the same). Add a HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT that an architecture can set to say it is safe to do the sorting at build time. Also update the config to compile in build time sorting in the sorttable code in scripts/ to depend on CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/944D10DA-8200-4BA9-8D0A-3BED9AA99F82@linux.ibm.com/ Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Yinan Liu Cc: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Kees Cook Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Reported-by: Sachin Sant Tested-by: Sachin Sant Fixes: 72b3942a173c ("scripts: ftrace - move the sort-processing in ftrace_init") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) --- arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + kernel/trace/Kconfig | 8 +++++++- scripts/Makefile | 2 +- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig index c2724d986fa0..5256ebe57451 100644 --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ config ARM select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT + select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK if !XIP_KERNEL select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if MMU select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE if !XIP_KERNEL && !CPU_ENDIAN_BE32 && MMU diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 7399327d1eff..46080dea5dba 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ config X86 select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK if HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING select HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT select HAVE_OBJTOOL_MCOUNT if STACK_VALIDATION + select HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE diff --git a/kernel/trace/Kconfig b/kernel/trace/Kconfig index 752ed89a293b..7e5b92090faa 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/Kconfig +++ b/kernel/trace/Kconfig @@ -70,10 +70,16 @@ config HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT help C version of recordmcount available? +config HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT + bool + help + An architecture selects this if it sorts the mcount_loc section + at build time. + config BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT bool default y - depends on BUILDTIME_TABLE_SORT && !S390 + depends on HAVE_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT help Sort the mcount_loc section at build time. diff --git a/scripts/Makefile b/scripts/Makefile index b082d2f93357..cedc1f0e21d8 100644 --- a/scripts/Makefile +++ b/scripts/Makefile @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -I$(srctree)/tools/arch/x86/include HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DUNWINDER_ORC_ENABLED endif -ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE +ifdef CONFIG_BUILDTIME_MCOUNT_SORT HOSTCFLAGS_sorttable.o += -DMCOUNT_SORT_ENABLED endif