From patchwork Thu Dec 23 10:21:26 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kefeng Wang X-Patchwork-Id: 1572561 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org (client-ip=112.213.38.117; helo=lists.ozlabs.org; envelope-from=linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JKQwv6rRnz9t9b for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 21:12:31 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4JKQwr6zWDz303F for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 21:12:28 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com (client-ip=45.249.212.255; helo=szxga08-in.huawei.com; envelope-from=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com; receiver=) Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com (szxga08-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.255]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JKQwc22C3z2yfm for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 21:12:12 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JKQrg6bjFz1DKFD; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:08:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:12:01 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain.localdomain (10.175.113.25) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:12:01 +0800 From: Kefeng Wang To: Kees Cook , Laura Abbott , "Mark Rutland" , , Andrew Morton , , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "Paul Mackerras" , Subject: [PATCH] Revert "mm/usercopy: Drop extra is_vmalloc_or_module() check" Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:21:26 +0800 Message-ID: <20211223102126.161848-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.113.25] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kefeng Wang Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This reverts commit 517e1fbeb65f5eade8d14f46ac365db6c75aea9b. usercopy: Kernel memory exposure attempt detected from SLUB object not in SLUB page?! (offset 0, size 1048)! kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:99 ... usercopy_abort+0x64/0xa0 (unreliable) __check_heap_object+0x168/0x190 __check_object_size+0x1a0/0x200 dev_ethtool+0x2494/0x2b20 dev_ioctl+0x5d0/0x770 sock_do_ioctl+0xf0/0x1d0 sock_ioctl+0x3ec/0x5a0 __se_sys_ioctl+0xf0/0x160 system_call_exception+0xfc/0x1f0 system_call_common+0xf8/0x200 When run ethtool eth0, the BUG occurred, the code shows below, data = vzalloc(array_size(gstrings.len, ETH_GSTRING_LEN)); copy_to_user(useraddr, data, gstrings.len * ETH_GSTRING_LEN)) The data is alloced by vmalloc(), virt_addr_valid(ptr) will return true on PowerPC64, which leads to the panic, add back the is_vmalloc_or_module() check to fix it. Fixes: 517e1fbeb65f (mm/usercopy: Drop extra is_vmalloc_or_module() check) Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang --- mm/usercopy.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/usercopy.c b/mm/usercopy.c index b3de3c4eefba..cfc845403017 100644 --- a/mm/usercopy.c +++ b/mm/usercopy.c @@ -225,6 +225,17 @@ static inline void check_heap_object(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, { struct page *page; + /* + * Some architectures (PowerPC64) return true for virt_addr_valid() on + * vmalloced addresses. Work around this by checking for vmalloc + * first. + * + * We also need to check for module addresses explicitly since we + * may copy static data from modules to userspace + */ + if (is_vmalloc_or_module_addr(ptr)) + return; + if (!virt_addr_valid(ptr)) return;