From patchwork Fri Mar 6 11:05:49 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Pratik R. Sampat" X-Patchwork-Id: 1250194 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48YlFx3NjMz9sPg for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:07:49 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48YlFx232XzDr39 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:07:49 +1100 (AEDT) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=psampat@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48YlCt3Q2YzDr1d for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 22:06:01 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 026AxrWo105429 for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 06:05:58 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2yk8hmqdv5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2020 06:05:57 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:05:55 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:05:52 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 026B5pCA59506800 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:05:51 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FA142042; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:05:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094AE42047; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:05:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pratiks-thinkpad.in.ibm.com (unknown [9.124.31.88]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 11:05:49 +0000 (GMT) From: Pratik Rajesh Sampat To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, psampat@linux.ibm.com, pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH] Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling") Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 16:35:49 +0530 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20030611-0016-0000-0000-000002EDBDD4 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20030611-0017-0000-0000-00003351157E Message-Id: <20200306110549.25517-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-03-06_03:2020-03-06, 2020-03-06 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2003060079 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn' Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat --- drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = { void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) { struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle); + struct cpufreq_policy *policy; unsigned int cpu; cpumask_t mask; @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work) chip->restore = false; for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) { int index; - struct cpufreq_policy policy; - cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu); - index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur); - powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index); - cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus); + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); + if (!policy) + continue; + index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur); + powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index); + cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus); + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy); } out: put_online_cpus();