From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:49 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089043 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8hd2TSvz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:54:25 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="t4SgPc4w"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8hd19cszDqHd for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:54:25 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="t4SgPc4w"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8cs0LrtzDqKl for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2c9023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:03 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2c9023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991404; bh=SmiVSvw93zT7NvPci9qgt4Vy7TfTUMkww9tsRFb3tZ0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=t4SgPc4w5I7DdstRLSozscsSmaeNRAtph21jYtwDtmFtamYizi6vDPeUC6Z0iKtXS ioMNCexdryOpYpIu8ADFPEW5fWQXCgek+DwDlnwgZqq1UUROzUm/LvFAXy+RyM7MXV tFrYRfR4akVsfljiE/skpPYRp0LfRpj/LDfpLiVzDQFYTg8JtWiqTuMTArkTexZcny 2LxkbPw8KNGxjz745TtsSqDM2gDhWWxwHLL2ZqpSPmEgOwnXEWyu8fMV46KvN+AaYI e1Y+LvNNpRlrTTL09XiEnvjziJs5EnfEatyNvENDoHyeEfbhxAo5Hfn9cl6Nxrn0Ng B5nPB6M1B9nlw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 01/11] ARM: prevent tracing IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:49 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" From: Arnd Bergmann When function tracing for IPIs is enabled, we get a warning for an overflow of the ipi_types array with the IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE type as triggered by raise_nmi(): arch/arm/kernel/smp.c: In function 'raise_nmi': arch/arm/kernel/smp.c:489:2: error: array subscript is above array bounds [-Werror=array-bounds] trace_ipi_raise(target, ipi_types[ipinr]); This is a correct warning as we actually overflow the array here. This patch raise_nmi() to call __smp_cross_call() instead of smp_cross_call(), to avoid calling into ftrace. For clarification, I'm also adding a two new code comments describing how this one is special. The warning appears to have shown up after patch e7273ff49acf ("ARM: 8488/1: Make IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE a "non-secure" SGI"), which changed the number assignment from '15' to '8', but as far as I can tell has existed since the IPI tracepoints were first introduced. If we decide to backport this patch to stable kernels, we probably need to backport e7273ff49acf as well. Fixes: e7273ff49acf ("ARM: 8488/1: Make IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE a "non-secure" SGI") Fixes: 365ec7b17327 ("ARM: add IPI tracepoints") # v3.17 Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann [yamada.masahiro@socionext.com: rebase on v5.1-rc1] Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- This is a long-standing issue, and Arnd posted this patch two years ago: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-February/409393.html It is no longer applied, so I rebased it on top of the latest kernel. Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h | 1 + arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h index cba23eaa6072..7a88f160b1fb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardirq.h @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include #include +/* number of IPIS _not_ including IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE */ #define NR_IPI 7 typedef struct { diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c index facd4240ca02..c93fe0f256de 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c @@ -70,6 +70,10 @@ enum ipi_msg_type { IPI_CPU_STOP, IPI_IRQ_WORK, IPI_COMPLETION, + /* + * CPU_BACKTRACE is special and not included in NR_IPI + * or tracable with trace_ipi_* + */ IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE, /* * SGI8-15 can be reserved by secure firmware, and thus may @@ -797,7 +801,7 @@ core_initcall(register_cpufreq_notifier); static void raise_nmi(cpumask_t *mask) { - smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE); + __smp_cross_call(mask, IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE); } void arch_trigger_cpumask_backtrace(const cpumask_t *mask, bool exclude_self) From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:50 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089047 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8nT0ZDzz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:58:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="qQonU7ZJ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8nS6X8kzDqCg for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:58:36 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="qQonU7ZJ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8cs0tX7zDqLs for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cA023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:04 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cA023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991405; bh=bSpCfUAcyt+UjPMgYyZQmseLNPkdMgHIhxbhwQzsBmI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qQonU7ZJ8JQuK/yYFMxbIUEgpGk8t0atMGb/Xg6wfixcHjJS4ZUo9nyW+pQqWbV8T OxvALrGC8d/ErgshgANG1OAY+TcpQpCqnaavYGTgwqrgaUitAzgyE/9JOFwv4BsBdG wbeykQA6/Q04egSC+2R80XMzpSETZsYTxdB0oHI0xSH/b0z6nhabFnafw6cY5n9tKs 0f2/DWceDLDknEENgje4LV91UluDtdJv9N5kvqx6b3GklMOHRjgjlpHvwKHOkoiQvj F7yiwswgn7WygwK4jBgoIws8Okj6DQ9vW0zIHi+Rcqbu1FlYnNlSg+X3RQo8mdEc/b gz8IOWt3SAfsQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 02/11] arm64: mark (__)cpus_have_const_cap as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:50 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-3-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for arm64, the following errors are reported: In file included from ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:68, from : ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h: In function 'cpus_have_const_cap': ./include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:120:38: warning: asm operand 0 probably doesn't match constraints #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) do { asm goto(x); asm (""); } while (0) ^~~ ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:32:2: note: in expansion of macro 'asm_volatile_goto' asm_volatile_goto( ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:120:38: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) do { asm goto(x); asm (""); } while (0) ^~~ ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:32:2: note: in expansion of macro 'asm_volatile_goto' asm_volatile_goto( ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Tested-by: Mark Rutland --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index e505e1fbd2b9..77d1aa57323e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_have_feature(unsigned int num) } /* System capability check for constant caps */ -static inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num) { if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS) return false; @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigned int num) return test_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps); } -static inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) { if (static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready)) return __cpus_have_const_cap(num); From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:51 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089037 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8fl5BFdz9sDn for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:52:47 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="afqDfXVj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8fl3yPTzDqN0 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:52:47 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="afqDfXVj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8cr66s7zDqK6 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cB023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:06 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cB023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991406; bh=Uo1hU/pOzqv1Q6UwWPC8xpA1XS41uzJeh8wwHc0qw10=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=afqDfXVjkaU0um6ru4UQMMi/0BjTNH297qWtGHSlxZheAmZyP7g2xdSoWOVya1o3F wGNcrJgeLRi6N/dbYoVHmPyHDzsnc2AU0bWQ+9qUTrdrQivAR0riQON09o58AWsOGr 3MiTJC5LhBxOf783Kh7T5ogQtLBRlDPZpIjEknU13Pb5R24UeulQjWWACsWqksWNy/ MOi4jEYXLWhhh0fOsa98tELQZ7ialZWJGxUV2Bf+R1moCuqtuvyxDYXI3zc0pibOqZ Ia4mCuwX/wsrlpQjBMZfH8khciAtejgbm1rP56cXK3ZONAbZKMksvRc2KMzhxqMxfc n907v8qlw7Oqw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 03/11] MIPS: mark mult_sh_align_mod() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:51 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-4-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for mips, the following error is reported: arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c: In function 'mult_sh_align_mod.constprop': arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' asm volatile( ^~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c index bada74af7641..c04b97aace4a 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ static inline void align_mod(const int align, const int mod) : "n"(align), "n"(mod)); } -static inline void mult_sh_align_mod(long *v1, long *v2, long *w, - const int align, const int mod) +static __always_inline void mult_sh_align_mod(long *v1, long *v2, long *w, + const int align, const int mod) { unsigned long flags; int m1, m2; From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:52 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089046 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8lt28Sbz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:57:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="JRgS6Tvy"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8lt0mz0zDq9J for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:57:14 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="JRgS6Tvy"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8cs1FV5zDqLx for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cC023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:07 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cC023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991409; bh=WxeGjpwIMtUh4NapkUcSoliRiI5DD/Rdf3zwHkix9l0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JRgS6TvykK2VfzGREOAHkRyhk2HU8HY8tH8Qv2cO2WA0R9pxRuSnRL2l2nwF2rSl2 uFBXOndu6Yxp30Ok+h6kuTyz1lG3PihD63BocSfvTU5n31Jo+S9vy3jMsA6nTJtEZs vm6Y9xJflB9iaVlWxhtuLPtePohZQGxBk6DAICJ/P8KdMoexqYceDJBLIBPcwtsL5p R/jAaPfkqPKMSUUT42VfBdxfmrbSbnp+alKzF5A7WCi2a92an7hfPqXb6HgnjbDNNN QjXdLJUq/2K/5VL0Ur5Ot1MGSdmgWZkTb+J72txXZMzvax7raUOfVsy5FUhwCuulkR uyV+27X02YYgg== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 04/11] s390/cpacf: mark scpacf_query() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:52 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-5-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for s390, the following error is reported: In file included from arch/s390/crypto/des_s390.c:19: ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function 'cpacf_query': ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile( ^~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h index 3cc52e37b4b2..f316de40e51b 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode) } } -static inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) +static __always_inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) { if (__cpacf_check_opcode(opcode)) { __cpacf_query(opcode, mask); From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:53 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089054 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8zt4tgXz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:07:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="n6YMDDai"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8zt3HqCzDqGt for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:07:38 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="n6YMDDai"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8dK02X1zDqMF for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cD023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:11 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cD023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991412; bh=ck3m1Bnhk+gBZ69Ip9jiWsEf5IWvpXJTs7wxMIQoCXU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n6YMDDaiO+Y+ehsJY3BwtkUdg1YDcyPA3Dzmuu8XOwJ1WrZig5ClP17Sypb2aBakK pdb05/Mxt6GVPh61aaBT0xJP66Mu0V7s+lzlxmzMKtCZpnT8wEPrNDYE+HzwcwOsrt M+K4hgRSZ2BsDVMyqA2McjsJjJooi4+aOx81MKG7ecEsFD8/riXxDnXctaXPrCzSeY 2Awph1mCyl2BuT2YcctjtjX9fGNx3slwDHVqkisVXH/eIqwqW4g1+6Ign1Zg0xzjsQ nEbhKOdhvwUnu9BexA/KqiOdzGngWI9/3T9raieSibcixW3rUYkf2NW/Jkw05P6Tx3 svNkTBvfuxmgA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 05/11] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: add initializer to avoid -Wmaybe-uninitialized Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:53 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-6-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. Kbuild test robot has never reported -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for this probably because vf610_nfc_run() is inlined by the x86 compiler's inlining heuristic. If CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is enabled for a different architecture and vf610_nfc_run() is not inlined, the following warning is reported: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c: In function ‘vf610_nfc_cmd’: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c:455:3: warning: ‘offset’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] vf610_nfc_rd_from_sram(instr->ctx.data.buf.in + offset, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ nfc->regs + NFC_MAIN_AREA(0) + offset, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ trfr_sz, !nfc->data_access); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c index a662ca1970e5..19792d725ec2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_cmd(struct nand_chip *chip, { const struct nand_op_instr *instr; struct vf610_nfc *nfc = chip_to_nfc(chip); - int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset; + int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset = 0; u32 col = 0, row = 0, cmd1 = 0, cmd2 = 0, code = 0; bool force8bit = false; From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:54 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089048 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8qL5V5Lz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:00:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="1P23h9vh"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8qL3y72zDqJK for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:00:14 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="1P23h9vh"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8d90pkLzDqMq for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cE023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:12 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cE023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991413; bh=h+EwU9qqdYxQmwoBR4Te9yGMUTWayFtr2mQvRUGDY+4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1P23h9vht+/GBqnRwv/UkIJ1suM0Gl11zAvmk/8SvuVwFNSEjjcz5wleVPujRFppK Nx/EYAsyelP9HyPthWeDWEqGmry1y5MqVAH4kuSg33aYusbvligBz2HN/GC99w5vtM 5Yg0icURIigmLM1gADO7WXFZwt4Hq3fD5BBu/LSkX8+UB6/Luat0ziOGN7ZMWhGLS9 fo58H0dKM6524EBjfnfQOTOMJ1r1Ka3EpWa+TiKZiQ94Q1gXooQjZTOQDDB6tvyUPV 0xBOTQRtogiBnMr/KZOj2ZHdEdJmH3fC/VnCXHcN5E/hwV0LkVqNuoBAt1sE3Wfa2v Nsv6CrzlYC6bA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 06/11] MIPS: mark __fls() and __ffs() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:54 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-7-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for mips, the following errors are reported: arch/mips/mm/sc-mips.o: In function `mips_sc_prefetch_enable.part.2': sc-mips.c:(.text+0x98): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0xbc): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0xc8): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0xdc): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' arch/mips/mm/sc-mips.o:sc-mips.c:(.text.unlikely+0x44): more undefined references to `mips_gcr_base' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: - forcibly inline __ffs() too Changes in v2: - new patch arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h index 830c93a010c3..9a466dde9b96 100644 --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static inline void __clear_bit_unlock(unsigned long nr, volatile unsigned long * * Return the bit position (0..63) of the most significant 1 bit in a word * Returns -1 if no 1 bit exists */ -static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word) +static __always_inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word) { int num; @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word) * Returns 0..SZLONG-1 * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first. */ -static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) +static __always_inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) { return __fls(word & -word); } From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:55 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089050 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8tt4qj1z9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:03:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="KkcVGuZw"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8tt3P0RzDqQF for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:03:18 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="KkcVGuZw"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8dG1V1XzDqMp for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cF023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:13 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cF023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991414; bh=6a2lxZ60QvbOnt17TfgaQyw8mxjsKyu0piFkGUEaJaM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KkcVGuZwG103H22stN6irsWh0/sE3M3Fy3ba9dpJ8bE+lRWF8/73lXPhpMJlOJ1dC HDbfqkLUOj8YWYZezvqSDCGIdHrA3b6mtMnVdeKAihhOSFTi75d3V5YMkzVDnusnr2 Rw7CiZrEfeqlhJwcxuKX67jhSm/GwXXH2AAd5hO03PCzS2n6mBkJw7LQjt1WuzBcxB zp8uRZnudBf6v6v98crxC1YC6HwhxAEH9CR13J0EN8vLuJkWpV6zlraxtQOH15A5/a 0OM2V6uoxhBSrIa6qnl6e66u2YQyPGzWKCrTYana/63053f3qtdEe/+GWbdYwjVmfA MOuO6rgVe+s9Q== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 07/11] ARM: mark setup_machine_tags() stub as __init __noreturn Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:55 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-8-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for arm, Clang build results in the following modpost warning: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1124): Section mismatch in reference from the function setup_machine_tags() to the function .init.text:early_print() The function setup_machine_tags() references the function __init early_print(). This is often because setup_machine_tags lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of early_print is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - new patch arch/arm/kernel/atags.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h index 201100226301..067e12edc341 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ void convert_to_tag_list(struct tag *tags); const struct machine_desc *setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr); #else -static inline const struct machine_desc * +static inline const struct machine_desc * __init __noreturn setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr) { early_print("no ATAGS support: can't continue\n"); From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:56 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089053 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8y948XTz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:06:09 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="Q1F13NSr"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8y935n0zDqHJ for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:06:09 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="Q1F13NSr"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8dH6b7yzDqMF for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cG023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:14 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cG023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991415; bh=7qo1vbhArO2n/LZF4sYuHYL1/6J0V//9VqfNxacUkeY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Q1F13NSrcvF2A8qD58k2kFX20pyFSYFFSEFXfst6MemH5nI+ogQbTVZV3rS+GsNcQ KHXD/9fjRv22l68l7IfxbcQnjZxs4/S6S0aDRad5BGjZ9TbVEhTGuuTtQqcH3vZlMa Siw+84dNlAlVVzvfSrMI067rafVMa4BZHPnzWNsDgdS02CdcDMajkswexssLpGT01t l2AFzuHdfvAep6hvoUoVEMXRoVxLbpZN+6DdicEMa0CRcEk/LeolZuI3xJ3MSFXuaj MiCbwlnKTnNt1QTVHluGORCKmpwIjnHxYZ/R8g+wKMdXrh00H0Yb3w3Ov8DaBB5Rkt tvc2mqgRywIIg== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 08/11] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:56 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); } From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:57 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089052 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8wV0hRKz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:04:42 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="DgLSh5p/"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8wT6mQqzDqDl for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:04:41 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="DgLSh5p/"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8dG2RgDzDqN7 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cH023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:16 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cH023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991416; bh=dlukBYO6sgrMJOkaTgBisXwB5sU3qv4thlZ8O2ehfGY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DgLSh5p//r6WFmO5jHCtDDcni9rgvcY+M0jXqaVcDpmetnoTv3LH2i7BbTaWnPEQA ekvT9GhnH/wJhjlIDDCG4ogK8OrxDRfpKrXxorea+hWs44MMGkmufq8vRI1VDI2xtf E/Egf9Qrn/X2ji428KFPPca6RL3Odgm+aeiI1TlOh5n2jGHjU9CzdRcVlpwYNM1u8B D3Rdxm3EAtjpH5wFt6I+bTxO/6dZmwf0tIr0TQbamP2Q7SfjkbqmrBg4bNiJZ+U2QP 5+M50jLU0nfTpzi0185F/CXJtegbNcH2kUGjKtAAsw1ufXr+9imCgE16mm7HqCVTgg 13SiP6iuu4Trw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 09/11] powerpc/mm/radix: mark __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:57 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-10-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following error is reported: arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__radix__flush_tlb_range_psize': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile(PPC_TLBIEL(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c index 6a23b9ebd2a1..a2b2848f0ae3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ void radix__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb) tlb->need_flush_all = 0; } -static inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, +static __always_inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int psize, bool also_pwc) { From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:58 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089049 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8s63FLFz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:01:46 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="Wkvm6o1l"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8s62G6czDqJj for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:01:46 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="Wkvm6o1l"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8d933wdzDqNw for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cI023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:17 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cI023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991417; bh=O+ymeBuOvG0uQG78yokX58qG5GQYyDm6Ks5zKkCXYg8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Wkvm6o1lunQyjJ9Kab2hpLJJedT9k6nDHed+tC9S6VEWmYvf12KiI0/z8UecSh1Eg xrkEGs/qi9IL4SEof7zav4uTYP2NKn+XLwUo/z1vl1eIWuA17x8p75dh3d6jQOZGHh N2qAtQbEChxQuldIRkwF1/08tj7sFulQcpJj8OpsIyRxy74PnIjvZVRyrF/edxyZnk LU9ba5mzUm28sLO+xk7dX5WwI3G4smz4D4xfAkONCSj9ym/jZSJQOCfTXeoOdlT3Xh ZWG8+Sol2L2KV3VGsZzHGEn8/lvYNwrSeDfa5qvcdMvUX8pvYS/oTV4OjOO7F7wkkQ r8yksoHWxXEqw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 10/11] powerpc/mm/radix: mark as __tlbie_pid() and friends as__always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:58 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-11-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following errors are reported: arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__tlbie_lpid': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:148:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile(PPC_TLBIE_5(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:148:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__tlbie_pid': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:118:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile(PPC_TLBIE_5(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__tlbiel_pid': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile(PPC_TLBIEL(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - new patch arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c index a2b2848f0ae3..14ff414d1545 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ void radix__tlbiel_all(unsigned int action) asm volatile(PPC_INVALIDATE_ERAT "; isync" : : :"memory"); } -static inline void __tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, int set, - unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void __tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, int set, + unsigned long ric) { unsigned long rb,rs,prs,r; @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline void __tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, int set, trace_tlbie(0, 1, rb, rs, ric, prs, r); } -static inline void __tlbie_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void __tlbie_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) { unsigned long rb,rs,prs,r; @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static inline void __tlbiel_lpid(unsigned long lpid, int set, trace_tlbie(lpid, 1, rb, rs, ric, prs, r); } -static inline void __tlbie_lpid(unsigned long lpid, unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void __tlbie_lpid(unsigned long lpid, unsigned long ric) { unsigned long rb,rs,prs,r; @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static inline void fixup_tlbie_lpid(unsigned long lpid) /* * We use 128 set in radix mode and 256 set in hpt mode. */ -static inline void _tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void _tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) { int set; From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:49:59 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089055 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p91g1LDxz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:09:11 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="ewcDEyxA"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p91g02yLzDqC4 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:09:11 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.74; helo=conuserg-07.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="ewcDEyxA"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com (conuserg-07.nifty.com [210.131.2.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8dK2XvjzDqKZ for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:51:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cJ023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:18 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cJ023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991419; bh=YGW0gg01jtKnXbnK1Ap0mVZ9GqJOY8DcvskWgXT4tQY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ewcDEyxAy830oNo0YRW7jR4QvsmMHJ7U9S64TPwRMLWVV1Rsdm+QuGqFD8eVuQzA1 JDeIVx3feidNla9E96nmF8wSY728TufIWZCckpdG4EdzTiWFjhDkl1qYWAhbGtMOvH xo8ifEmC+GwRQFpXB00+PHkczCbiY3Edx/sD0mvzV134YRwxkX7r+n7NXQBI2jQ/PC tzTk4fiyXAczxbRs/vk2vJTApA0bhWQQ9OU7i7d1T/3wDZ0R7kU9AELrMePMx0TqNa MxOdnol7IZuan0BiS94RGSAcH1PAU3odAktvY0h5BgyeHTBXnhekgv8YtdPaUB6ptG t6M2dszBtsRcg== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 11/11] compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:59 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-12-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Commit 60a3cdd06394 ("x86: add optimized inlining") introduced CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING, but it has been available only for x86. The idea is obviously arch-agnostic. This commit moves the config entry from arch/x86/Kconfig.debug to lib/Kconfig.debug so that all architectures can benefit from it. This can make a huge difference in kernel image size especially when CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is enabled. For example, I got 3.5% smaller arm64 kernel for v5.1-rc1. dec file 18983424 arch/arm64/boot/Image.before 18321920 arch/arm64/boot/Image.after This also slightly improves the "Kernel hacking" Kconfig menu as e61aca5158a8 ("Merge branch 'kconfig-diet' from Dave Hansen') suggested; this config option would be a good fit in the "compiler option" menu. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Borislav Petkov --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 --- arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 14 -------------- include/linux/compiler_types.h | 3 +-- lib/Kconfig.debug | 14 ++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 62fc3fda1a05..f214bb5d60d8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -310,9 +310,6 @@ config ZONE_DMA32 config AUDIT_ARCH def_bool y if X86_64 -config ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING - def_bool y - config ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC def_bool y diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug index 15d0fbe27872..f730680dc818 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug @@ -266,20 +266,6 @@ config CPA_DEBUG ---help--- Do change_page_attr() self-tests every 30 seconds. -config OPTIMIZE_INLINING - bool "Allow gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline'" - ---help--- - This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions - developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to - do what it thinks is best, which is desirable for the gcc 3.x series of - compilers. The gcc 4.x series have a rewritten inlining algorithm and - enabling this option will generate a smaller kernel there. Hopefully - this algorithm is so good that allowing gcc 4.x and above to make the - decision will become the default in the future. Until then this option - is there to test gcc for this. - - If unsure, say N. - config DEBUG_ENTRY bool "Debug low-level entry code" depends on DEBUG_KERNEL diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h index ba814f18cb4c..19e58b9138a0 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h @@ -140,8 +140,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data { * Do not use __always_inline here, since currently it expands to inline again * (which would break users of __always_inline). */ -#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) || \ - !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) +#if !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) #define inline inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) __gnu_inline \ __maybe_unused notrace #else diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 00dbcdbc9a0d..37402f210115 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -310,6 +310,20 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK exported to $(INSTALL_HDR_PATH) (usually 'usr/include' in your build tree), to make sure they're suitable. +config OPTIMIZE_INLINING + bool "Allow compiler to uninline functions marked 'inline'" + help + This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions + developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to + do what it thinks is best, which is desirable for the gcc 3.x series of + compilers. The gcc 4.x series have a rewritten inlining algorithm and + enabling this option will generate a smaller kernel there. Hopefully + this algorithm is so good that allowing gcc 4.x and above to make the + decision will become the default in the future. Until then this option + is there to test gcc for this. + + If unsure, say N. + config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis" help