From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:20:57 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p81X4v4fz9sB3 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:24:00 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="HhguvRQP"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p81X3qD0zDqNP for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:24:00 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="HhguvRQP"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zV2pwwzDqLH for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:12 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LC031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:09 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LC031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989670; bh=bSpCfUAcyt+UjPMgYyZQmseLNPkdMgHIhxbhwQzsBmI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HhguvRQPBV04y4e8uTU/yCcJnlGpGZVqQz/SkpmVCXuXmNhTv6CN/+Xsf+AqSUWE2 DEO02/iGxqciaWSLDfzKCt8677bXXPM5n9VuxPOGV4fFetXdXEHpqPCfJ9naM3n94g xyIwH5yGiExYosKXtbvvhn0/xlHklTGGKvdmTCjO8WdctGc5UKfPD4E2Hy1U59F2vN 279wTN33gi8iLgl/pY7I1JYAC1bw/Ag1dTa0cRby1+pShWAWQ6HPTY3P0BR311/vuc MEYtE7GpmVS8PX2kMpLhDn8gZ6Q+gThMCBHQmZmZtKRVcV5kbwRMDkJXnAqUnurOGi SJiKOWS4C8JJA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 01/10] arm64: mark (__)cpus_have_const_cap as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:20:57 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-2-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for arm64, the following errors are reported: In file included from ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:68, from : ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h: In function 'cpus_have_const_cap': ./include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:120:38: warning: asm operand 0 probably doesn't match constraints #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) do { asm goto(x); asm (""); } while (0) ^~~ ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:32:2: note: in expansion of macro 'asm_volatile_goto' asm_volatile_goto( ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:120:38: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' #define asm_volatile_goto(x...) do { asm goto(x); asm (""); } while (0) ^~~ ./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:32:2: note: in expansion of macro 'asm_volatile_goto' asm_volatile_goto( ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h index e505e1fbd2b9..77d1aa57323e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_have_feature(unsigned int num) } /* System capability check for constant caps */ -static inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool __cpus_have_const_cap(int num) { if (num >= ARM64_NCAPS) return false; @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static inline bool cpus_have_cap(unsigned int num) return test_bit(num, cpu_hwcaps); } -static inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) +static __always_inline bool cpus_have_const_cap(int num) { if (static_branch_likely(&arm64_const_caps_ready)) return __cpus_have_const_cap(num); From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:20:58 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8584NVBz9sBV for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:08 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="RQl+05KO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p85834XCzDq9p for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:27:08 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="RQl+05KO"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zm6pFSzDqNC for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LD031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:10 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LD031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989671; bh=Uo1hU/pOzqv1Q6UwWPC8xpA1XS41uzJeh8wwHc0qw10=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RQl+05KOKoPFyxSI2FuyZ89MGQq0gLVxtR0GWFgEWNRsXcCy0ywyMCoApyQXmEl2n io077/9bKRr3TeYS3JcPQpAgG+CgbDwSbEuJjT7Lmm7Jw6tR92Yz0nQViiui/FvOYz OHEdmjKD4ngKPNZFO6+CjberrgaPoe16v9aVfe5TB6AkQWrH8BAv1i7oqy5w8xLaj2 RzbqB8+k+ccjgH7NZYljMP+UkT7M08F+jN4dlBRwqq5ZGhZlN6W78e7n79Ti0CPVAz o9Klq/jAOFriEnk7sGfoNu3h+Jeytk82FTnBT3j7jCa2JpKnKNKSS7Hd5r/0KKb6Z/ rdh6GlVxkt4pA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 02/10] MIPS: mark mult_sh_align_mod() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:20:58 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-3-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for mips, the following error is reported: arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c: In function 'mult_sh_align_mod.constprop': arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: asm operand 1 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' asm volatile( ^~~ arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c:33:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' asm volatile( ^~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c index bada74af7641..c04b97aace4a 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ static inline void align_mod(const int align, const int mod) : "n"(align), "n"(mod)); } -static inline void mult_sh_align_mod(long *v1, long *v2, long *w, - const int align, const int mod) +static __always_inline void mult_sh_align_mod(long *v1, long *v2, long *w, + const int align, const int mod) { unsigned long flags; int m1, m2; From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:20:59 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8BC72CBz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:31:31 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="I0CioBDT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8BC5Z3wzDqM5 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:31:31 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="I0CioBDT"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zt6CQ6zDqNn for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LE031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:11 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LE031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989672; bh=WxeGjpwIMtUh4NapkUcSoliRiI5DD/Rdf3zwHkix9l0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=I0CioBDTkc1GHuaVSUtq8jVEnHXnq1hGY5fDTmiT2yZDSu6CTfVaaVXOU2ocZq0yd yau4zui0pA9Gklyfdi8o/AJZ0Ym0WBMT+wi/ZHIchu3uqVfAfpQFmT6dC6tCX/Ecrl cvxzp/A3CvHBT2XR5HyFgtORaimjq81j8GYVV04h9nnnWkEIg7LZQoh4wdOFskjT2d 5eeCSxlqfwdPytf+3xnWAoqknX7CikjegNqgQuyxt3anZOWoLqsxIgU6AOl4i9IKb9 pVYIeb0NCpH/BeB18yE5PgIoZGN8m8fwFMGMGGUgfjYtgwRleo8ZKHDsJzkNe/clDM UU4f0eSYQFKRQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 03/10] s390/cpacf: mark scpacf_query() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:20:59 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-4-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for s390, the following error is reported: In file included from arch/s390/crypto/des_s390.c:19: ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h: In function 'cpacf_query': ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile( ^~~ ./arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h:170:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h index 3cc52e37b4b2..f316de40e51b 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/cpacf.h @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static inline int __cpacf_check_opcode(unsigned int opcode) } } -static inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) +static __always_inline int cpacf_query(unsigned int opcode, cpacf_mask_t *mask) { if (__cpacf_check_opcode(opcode)) { __cpacf_query(opcode, mask); From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:00 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p88V65tnz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:30:02 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="gV33Qf2t"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p88V4y4YzDqNN for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:30:02 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="gV33Qf2t"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zt2RYczDqMT for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LF031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:13 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LF031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989673; bh=ck3m1Bnhk+gBZ69Ip9jiWsEf5IWvpXJTs7wxMIQoCXU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gV33Qf2twLt0S6KodHjawBrkc1EsU13fh2qP1ShaK+o/SW6rZPyaYhhtUGjSAMOAL R6pXzzLQz8ZPC8irBjiP9xHCy62EbVDEQXUwURuCleI0FJA77siCTw7Cz4XKgG1UfL HVZpVKmESAPZc46mK1RRH+1phNlLhepGkqPxUGjE20kRpWeZm0GYs2r7kDaFXdO6qR cCIMvz79juH6wsQD+t5Jx+BzNhp4jE7MKMO0MND1/4edyYQRn+I+KQBoZTCFmf4xjF qjQonQHFppXfOIXGtZ0OqQBPESG1vJw9Dz8ZTGLbmLDpEupQ6kYWoETwrSNw/80XCk Xjd7IfyPdLgtA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 04/10] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: add initializer to avoid -Wmaybe-uninitialized Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:00 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-5-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. Kbuild test robot has never reported -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for this probably because vf610_nfc_run() is inlined by the x86 compiler's inlining heuristic. If CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is enabled for a different architecture and vf610_nfc_run() is not inlined, the following warning is reported: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c: In function ‘vf610_nfc_cmd’: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c:455:3: warning: ‘offset’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] vf610_nfc_rd_from_sram(instr->ctx.data.buf.in + offset, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ nfc->regs + NFC_MAIN_AREA(0) + offset, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ trfr_sz, !nfc->data_access); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c index a662ca1970e5..19792d725ec2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_cmd(struct nand_chip *chip, { const struct nand_op_instr *instr; struct vf610_nfc *nfc = chip_to_nfc(chip); - int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset; + int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset = 0; u32 col = 0, row = 0, cmd1 = 0, cmd2 = 0, code = 0; bool force8bit = false; From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:01 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089026 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8Fm3QStz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:34:36 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="fMKCLsF3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8Fm2D7lzDqP2 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:34:36 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="fMKCLsF3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8001G3NzDqN0 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LG031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:14 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LG031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989674; bh=h+EwU9qqdYxQmwoBR4Te9yGMUTWayFtr2mQvRUGDY+4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fMKCLsF3vkn9rbVZhxunvSAMM1Ddyvfw4vhVutiax7d6r5MGg5J+w/v+g9LBr5+MI ieWoiaS1OLlFVtp+QKr0m9JEjPoY+8pPmRdg5b44U9460ffFvLQwmFSJFE4jOGbWxx PDkpXqS8Z/ZQOHY0KUZ6uRXCdkke35qzo4RTbqWEWQp3vat0X3qNniNDLni4YzgSJU 4QMbOozCm1B4Y8AaI55Utaqe1HTzhYbq57WwpNrAxlZD1CHDTqpd+8GKFaCBkdbiuM gT43p76B4VW4DY3pieAT65tbDDC1nN6ToA5XhujC/nwH8MPSUYMhuIay6PnMr+TD3/ k2XbmcHB78PYg== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 05/10] MIPS: mark __fls() and __ffs() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:01 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-6-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for mips, the following errors are reported: arch/mips/mm/sc-mips.o: In function `mips_sc_prefetch_enable.part.2': sc-mips.c:(.text+0x98): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0x9c): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0xbc): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0xc8): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' sc-mips.c:(.text+0xdc): undefined reference to `mips_gcr_base' arch/mips/mm/sc-mips.o:sc-mips.c:(.text.unlikely+0x44): more undefined references to `mips_gcr_base' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: - forcibly inline __ffs() too Changes in v2: - new patch arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h index 830c93a010c3..9a466dde9b96 100644 --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static inline void __clear_bit_unlock(unsigned long nr, volatile unsigned long * * Return the bit position (0..63) of the most significant 1 bit in a word * Returns -1 if no 1 bit exists */ -static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word) +static __always_inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word) { int num; @@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word) * Returns 0..SZLONG-1 * Undefined if no bit exists, so code should check against 0 first. */ -static inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) +static __always_inline unsigned long __ffs(unsigned long word) { return __fls(word & -word); } From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:02 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089027 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8Hd4VTNz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:36:13 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="CHPtc9jS"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8Hd271nzDqCH for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:36:13 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="CHPtc9jS"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8005YMvzDqMS for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LH031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:15 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LH031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989676; bh=6a2lxZ60QvbOnt17TfgaQyw8mxjsKyu0piFkGUEaJaM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CHPtc9jSL+9ebuZO/skz7KvegyF3HYZD/nb6/DUdMdujdL8RxU/elng/gx9lj7zmN 3LS//0ivw+/Lk89IGnZjJkOdZyR47Hr8cuKKAf9OB2cw7QwCfosqxN7q9/NSvjLQcu gswk62JqD1xBPGrZr5R5e7bwFyb8X9fRto9UW4pYcvEXoyrV1Qj9H5ghciINvvuaOZ LOES2rW0cy4ghzpgTXNZgj2B7dO7gvFk1/HK8GGyehvEr5qGYAXvqhC4ffi6lQOJ43 Q6j9nhdCfBQNAj49iioj3TEtmPutjuAz9A6aQXI2YIiNFK8b5AQoiP+KVg1lECf/fc HUrKflwhtfxWQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 06/10] ARM: mark setup_machine_tags() stub as __init __noreturn Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:02 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-7-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for arm, Clang build results in the following modpost warning: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x1124): Section mismatch in reference from the function setup_machine_tags() to the function .init.text:early_print() The function setup_machine_tags() references the function __init early_print(). This is often because setup_machine_tags lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of early_print is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - new patch arch/arm/kernel/atags.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h index 201100226301..067e12edc341 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/atags.h @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ void convert_to_tag_list(struct tag *tags); const struct machine_desc *setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr); #else -static inline const struct machine_desc * +static inline const struct machine_desc * __init __noreturn setup_machine_tags(phys_addr_t __atags_pointer, unsigned int machine_nr) { early_print("no ATAGS support: can't continue\n"); From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:03 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089028 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8KF2p0Lz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:37:37 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="ByF3Wmdm"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8KF1m6dzDqLs for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:37:37 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="ByF3Wmdm"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8021C6LzDqMS for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LI031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:16 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LI031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989677; bh=7qo1vbhArO2n/LZF4sYuHYL1/6J0V//9VqfNxacUkeY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ByF3Wmdmakc6HLxf+7sO4AecDTjocpMpuNC8cuKlErGY2yh/dUHLMuh9zSFWEGTqW q+KiAI+xFh2t24Ab9m1yrPP17Cyl+UhoxHAxcgFKNrCZCdOQN3cso9Mb/EXfi2daGR hlvySMMI/+wVS1osaiozGonKjB5tKKgqQoKy+9b/ap9neqJLqr1tga0RknQmdLF5JK mrAbzkbvLcAzZ1NxGJ9dZS3STvmHdygjzqiMUFvx18/R69eytCCnyKXuaz6EFMKoqG qZ0UXSQUDTS36O4kuT/WHJOuuDNS3UAjjBtSEpPsRvPp7tR/lkpLgjI9bHexOD5AsD z+jiwwsUH5rGA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 07/10] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:03 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-8-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); } From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:04 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p86q5bz9z9s9T for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:28:35 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xm48M3KR"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p86q4L12zDqNW for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:28:35 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="xm48M3KR"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zt0f94zDqNd for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LJ031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:17 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LJ031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989678; bh=dlukBYO6sgrMJOkaTgBisXwB5sU3qv4thlZ8O2ehfGY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xm48M3KRfOyJ5kQVTw4Ovn149SHzUzjXnB91gR/MwjfLF0ptp5BEUN0KLVknYLbrp 2X/icDCYfRB9UYEbC3NAUGKwCdyo8dDDhGSx5tTGtY5HP4wqmdSP34dZKju4n+Gge+ 49so/3DvgiDJ/GVfMURchnCnlw9DNnZeiui7LkTskHswqEbB0x2gtSC2rxId3AjZBR GGo7gUXhxNWh5yHM3nD+kCXE9yK+n2f0qxD3hgG6HSsvsfV/vYDp6FrtitJ2VYs22S 56kVXNRMf3PkQZYnDbPEP33MV+F6/q6okJweuR2UIDtfb+ST3kPAUvQaC9zZcF4djh 8B1WciaXUL4Dw== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 08/10] powerpc/mm/radix: mark __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize() as __always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:04 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following error is reported: arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__radix__flush_tlb_range_psize': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints [-Werror] asm volatile(PPC_TLBIEL(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c index 6a23b9ebd2a1..a2b2848f0ae3 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c @@ -928,7 +928,7 @@ void radix__tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb) tlb->need_flush_all = 0; } -static inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, +static __always_inline void __radix__flush_tlb_range_psize(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int psize, bool also_pwc) { From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:05 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089023 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8Cp61SYz9s71 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:32:54 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="dvn9x6ox"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8Cp4XnLzDqNn for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:32:54 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="dvn9x6ox"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p7zy28xRzDqMM for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:37 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LK031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:18 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LK031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989679; bh=O+ymeBuOvG0uQG78yokX58qG5GQYyDm6Ks5zKkCXYg8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dvn9x6ox5fKI53z4C6POxz1XdusTJbpCXwpiePE9LkrLtyiVEIl8HbNcb4g1F9TNB aLbM74ElzoqAyKnhrfnhn9JGJaQm1caHcFa4qctMPGnbOLqDTSgwRJD+DMSdkE3oiq aR2pnUT6YCEfjxTc6TYECEcOwIzEka03xMTxtqwFA3hlWUWiPuWqFoF8n+/OFUbHrE mzanNOf1EV4wOrj/BXXqBW3Z3HA7y/GIxH/mT9mVx5M0ECaljXrIelcr+WwVJWjZKF l8G7HidXSJAw+7R306/qLGO/OZ8WJEVwXAlkIW6xpK57x+Swra3rVWvL5WVo56xmgn TxHQ+4IdfDqVQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 09/10] powerpc/mm/radix: mark as __tlbie_pid() and friends as__always_inline Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:05 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-10-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following errors are reported: arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__tlbie_lpid': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:148:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile(PPC_TLBIE_5(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:148:2: error: impossible constraint in 'asm' arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__tlbie_pid': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:118:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile(PPC_TLBIE_5(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c: In function '__tlbiel_pid': arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c:104:2: warning: asm operand 3 probably doesn't match constraints asm volatile(PPC_TLBIEL(%0, %4, %3, %2, %1) ^~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - new patch arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c index a2b2848f0ae3..14ff414d1545 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/tlb-radix.c @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ void radix__tlbiel_all(unsigned int action) asm volatile(PPC_INVALIDATE_ERAT "; isync" : : :"memory"); } -static inline void __tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, int set, - unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void __tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, int set, + unsigned long ric) { unsigned long rb,rs,prs,r; @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline void __tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, int set, trace_tlbie(0, 1, rb, rs, ric, prs, r); } -static inline void __tlbie_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void __tlbie_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) { unsigned long rb,rs,prs,r; @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static inline void __tlbiel_lpid(unsigned long lpid, int set, trace_tlbie(lpid, 1, rb, rs, ric, prs, r); } -static inline void __tlbie_lpid(unsigned long lpid, unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void __tlbie_lpid(unsigned long lpid, unsigned long ric) { unsigned long rb,rs,prs,r; @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static inline void fixup_tlbie_lpid(unsigned long lpid) /* * We use 128 set in radix mode and 256 set in hpt mode. */ -static inline void _tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) +static __always_inline void _tlbiel_pid(unsigned long pid, unsigned long ric) { int set; From patchwork Tue Apr 23 03:21:06 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Masahiro Yamada X-Patchwork-Id: 1089029 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8Lr4qV9z9s9T for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:39:00 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="mCn02M/+"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44p8Lr3kzQzDqP8 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:39:00 +1000 (AEST) X-Original-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=softfail (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=socionext.com (client-ip=210.131.2.76; helo=conuserg-09.nifty.com; envelope-from=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="mCn02M/+"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from conuserg-09.nifty.com (conuserg-09.nifty.com [210.131.2.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44p8022gFMzDqMT for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:22:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-09.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3L8LL031384; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:19 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-09.nifty.com x3N3L8LL031384 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555989680; bh=YGW0gg01jtKnXbnK1Ap0mVZ9GqJOY8DcvskWgXT4tQY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mCn02M/+Zs1tTrnfj5kcK/rIXu8Qjzpou6KA7O8+YMQxaTRIOmJiYSdn1yiI2naKt MOHV0re8MJvGrURubZ52FRJWYB8BKJDCHdtm0+gi/mtbUq5QKLWZPGOju5xSwUZcWl v62g+gXthE8J+NAD4NPy45+MxSmZ7tonTDzlWDzHGQzYMmZaYvOa54z3WQuT8Zuufn RRLTWAFT4J9sYGariQ0SfM01A/+8PRgOu0jsL4gPe489CoMR6D8YJvBgVXCuHjnXp7 ss+JT31y4kchSzLW7k/zDncSQUjZSSKhKjjg3CKu47It7stLcp72/4twqXDWyaFFPZ vwoBCpY9sZvjQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Subject: [PATCH v3 10/10] compiler: allow all arches to enable CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:21:06 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423032106.11960-11-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423032106.11960-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Mathieu Malaterre , x86@kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masahiro Yamada , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+patchwork-incoming=ozlabs.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Commit 60a3cdd06394 ("x86: add optimized inlining") introduced CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING, but it has been available only for x86. The idea is obviously arch-agnostic. This commit moves the config entry from arch/x86/Kconfig.debug to lib/Kconfig.debug so that all architectures can benefit from it. This can make a huge difference in kernel image size especially when CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE is enabled. For example, I got 3.5% smaller arm64 kernel for v5.1-rc1. dec file 18983424 arch/arm64/boot/Image.before 18321920 arch/arm64/boot/Image.after This also slightly improves the "Kernel hacking" Kconfig menu as e61aca5158a8 ("Merge branch 'kconfig-diet' from Dave Hansen') suggested; this config option would be a good fit in the "compiler option" menu. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Acked-by: Borislav Petkov --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 --- arch/x86/Kconfig.debug | 14 -------------- include/linux/compiler_types.h | 3 +-- lib/Kconfig.debug | 14 ++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 62fc3fda1a05..f214bb5d60d8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -310,9 +310,6 @@ config ZONE_DMA32 config AUDIT_ARCH def_bool y if X86_64 -config ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING - def_bool y - config ARCH_SUPPORTS_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC def_bool y diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug index 15d0fbe27872..f730680dc818 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.debug @@ -266,20 +266,6 @@ config CPA_DEBUG ---help--- Do change_page_attr() self-tests every 30 seconds. -config OPTIMIZE_INLINING - bool "Allow gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline'" - ---help--- - This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions - developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to - do what it thinks is best, which is desirable for the gcc 3.x series of - compilers. The gcc 4.x series have a rewritten inlining algorithm and - enabling this option will generate a smaller kernel there. Hopefully - this algorithm is so good that allowing gcc 4.x and above to make the - decision will become the default in the future. Until then this option - is there to test gcc for this. - - If unsure, say N. - config DEBUG_ENTRY bool "Debug low-level entry code" depends on DEBUG_KERNEL diff --git a/include/linux/compiler_types.h b/include/linux/compiler_types.h index ba814f18cb4c..19e58b9138a0 100644 --- a/include/linux/compiler_types.h +++ b/include/linux/compiler_types.h @@ -140,8 +140,7 @@ struct ftrace_likely_data { * Do not use __always_inline here, since currently it expands to inline again * (which would break users of __always_inline). */ -#if !defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING) || \ - !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) +#if !defined(CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING) #define inline inline __attribute__((__always_inline__)) __gnu_inline \ __maybe_unused notrace #else diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index 00dbcdbc9a0d..37402f210115 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -310,6 +310,20 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK exported to $(INSTALL_HDR_PATH) (usually 'usr/include' in your build tree), to make sure they're suitable. +config OPTIMIZE_INLINING + bool "Allow compiler to uninline functions marked 'inline'" + help + This option determines if the kernel forces gcc to inline the functions + developers have marked 'inline'. Doing so takes away freedom from gcc to + do what it thinks is best, which is desirable for the gcc 3.x series of + compilers. The gcc 4.x series have a rewritten inlining algorithm and + enabling this option will generate a smaller kernel there. Hopefully + this algorithm is so good that allowing gcc 4.x and above to make the + decision will become the default in the future. Until then this option + is there to test gcc for this. + + If unsure, say N. + config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis" help