Message ID | 20220621191553.69455-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants | expand |
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:15:45 +0200 > While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed > type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in > places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but > also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the > following code: [...] Oh gosh, now s390 failed and 7/8 revealed one existing code flaw in the ice driver. I'll fix those, then will try to test more platforms (to not spam series again) and send v5 soon (mentioning this as bots CCs only myself). > -- > 2.36.1 Thanks, Olek
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:15:45 +0200 > > > While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed > > type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in > > places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but > > also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the > > following code: > > [...] > > Oh gosh, now s390 failed and 7/8 revealed one existing code flaw in > the ice driver. > I'll fix those, then will try to test more platforms (to not spam > series again) and send v5 soon (mentioning this as bots CCs only > myself). One mail per person? Because I also got a report.
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:22:38 +0300 > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 02:24:40PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> > > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 21:15:45 +0200 > > > > > While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed > > > type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in > > > places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but > > > also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the > > > following code: > > > > [...] > > > > Oh gosh, now s390 failed and 7/8 revealed one existing code flaw in > > the ice driver. > > I'll fix those, then will try to test more platforms (to not spam > > series again) and send v5 soon (mentioning this as bots CCs only > > myself). > > One mail per person? Because I also got a report. From the headers: From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> Cc: <llvm@lists.linux.dev>, <kbuild-all@lists.01.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> I guess it's due to your Reviewed-by in the commit message, no one else from the original CCs list is present. > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko Thanks, Olek