From patchwork Sun May 26 23:12:40 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: BALATON Zoltan X-Patchwork-Id: 1939483 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4VnZRn5zxyz20ds for ; Mon, 27 May 2024 09:17:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sBN4S-0004Dn-Do; Sun, 26 May 2024 19:14:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sBN4L-00048b-13; Sun, 26 May 2024 19:14:25 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([152.66.115.2]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sBN4I-0003gA-44; Sun, 26 May 2024 19:14:24 -0400 Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6607E4E601D; Mon, 27 May 2024 01:12:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eik.bme.hu Received: from zero.eik.bme.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by zero.eik.bme.hu (zero.eik.bme.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10028) with ESMTP id BXvzrnjHPq9G; Mon, 27 May 2024 01:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by zero.eik.bme.hu (Postfix, from userid 432) id 71D7C4E602D; Mon, 27 May 2024 01:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: From: BALATON Zoltan Subject: [PATCH 05/43] target/ppc/mmu_common.c: Remove another single use local variable MIME-Version: 1.0 To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: Nicholas Piggin , Daniel Henrique Barboza Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 01:12:40 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=152.66.115.2; envelope-from=balaton@eik.bme.hu; helo=zero.eik.bme.hu X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org In ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check() the pteh variable is used only once to compare to the h parameter of the function. Inline its value and use pteh name for the function parameter which is more descriptive. Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin --- target/ppc/mmu_common.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c index 16578f7fa5..b21f52290f 100644 --- a/target/ppc/mmu_common.c +++ b/target/ppc/mmu_common.c @@ -95,15 +95,14 @@ int ppc6xx_tlb_getnum(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong eaddr, } static int ppc6xx_tlb_pte_check(mmu_ctx_t *ctx, target_ulong pte0, - target_ulong pte1, int h, + target_ulong pte1, int pteh, MMUAccessType access_type) { - int ret, pteh, pp; + int ret, pp; ret = -1; /* Check validity and table match */ - pteh = (pte0 >> 6) & 1; - if (pte_is_valid(pte0) && h == pteh) { + if (pte_is_valid(pte0) && ((pte0 >> 6) & 1) == pteh) { /* Check vsid & api */ pp = pte1 & 0x00000003; if ((pte0 & PTE_PTEM_MASK) == ctx->ptem) {