From patchwork Fri Jan 12 02:47:57 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Zhoujian (jay)" X-Patchwork-Id: 859472 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=2001:4830:134:3::11; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zHnKk6v1Mz9sPk for ; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 13:50:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZpQ8-00084R-TR for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:50:16 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZpPJ-000811-6I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:49:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZpPG-0001OS-1j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:49:25 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:2068 helo=huawei.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eZpPE-0001Gr-Pk; Thu, 11 Jan 2018 21:49:21 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 2F3524408D5DB; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:49:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.177.19.14) by DGGEMS408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.208) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:49:00 +0800 From: Jay Zhou To: Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 10:47:57 +0800 Message-ID: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.1.windows.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.177.19.14] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 45.249.212.191 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 1/3] vhost: remove assertion to prevent crash X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: weidong.huang@huawei.com, mst@redhat.com, wangxinxin.wang@huawei.com, qemu-stable@nongnu.org, arei.gonglei@huawei.com, jianjay.zhou@huawei.com, imammedo@redhat.com, liuzhe13@huawei.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" QEMU will assert on vhost-user backed virtio device hotplug if QEMU is using more RAM regions than VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS (for example if it were started with a lot of DIMM devices). Fix it by returning error instead of asserting and let callers of vhost_set_mem_table() handle error condition gracefully. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov Signed-off-by: Jay Zhou --- hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index 093675e..8500562 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c @@ -317,11 +317,14 @@ static int vhost_user_set_mem_table(struct vhost_dev *dev, &offset); fd = memory_region_get_fd(mr); if (fd > 0) { + if (fd_num == VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS) { + error_report("Failed preparing vhost-user memory table msg"); + return -1; + } msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].userspace_addr = reg->userspace_addr; msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].memory_size = reg->memory_size; msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].guest_phys_addr = reg->guest_phys_addr; msg.payload.memory.regions[fd_num].mmap_offset = offset; - assert(fd_num < VHOST_MEMORY_MAX_NREGIONS); fds[fd_num++] = fd; } }