@@ -89,10 +89,6 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(cvttq, TCG_CALL_CONST, i64, i64)
DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(cvttq_c, TCG_CALL_CONST, i64, i64)
DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(cvttq_svic, TCG_CALL_CONST, i64, i64)
-DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(cvtql, TCG_CALL_CONST | TCG_CALL_PURE, i64, i64)
-DEF_HELPER_1(cvtql_v, i64, i64)
-DEF_HELPER_1(cvtql_sv, i64, i64)
-
DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(setroundmode, TCG_CALL_CONST, void, i32)
DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(setflushzero, TCG_CALL_CONST, void, i32)
DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_0(fp_exc_clear, TCG_CALL_CONST, void)
@@ -1159,26 +1159,6 @@ uint64_t helper_cvtlq (uint64_t a)
return (lo & 0x3FFFFFFF) | (hi & 0xc0000000);
}
-uint64_t helper_cvtql (uint64_t a)
-{
- return ((a & 0xC0000000) << 32) | ((a & 0x7FFFFFFF) << 29);
-}
-
-uint64_t helper_cvtql_v (uint64_t a)
-{
- if ((int32_t)a != (int64_t)a)
- helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
- return helper_cvtql(a);
-}
-
-uint64_t helper_cvtql_sv (uint64_t a)
-{
- /* ??? I'm pretty sure there's nothing that /sv needs to do that /v
- doesn't do. The only thing I can think is that /sv is a valid
- instruction merely for completeness in the ISA. */
- return helper_cvtql_v(a);
-}
-
/* PALcode support special instructions */
#if !defined (CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
void helper_hw_rei (void)
@@ -597,6 +597,41 @@ static inline void gen_fp_exc_raise(int rc, int fn11)
gen_fp_exc_raise_ignore(rc, fn11, fn11 & QUAL_I ? 0 : float_flag_inexact);
}
+static void gen_fcvtql(int rb, int rc)
+{
+ if (unlikely(rc == 31)) {
+ return;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(rb == 31)) {
+ tcg_gen_movi_i64(cpu_fir[rc], 0);
+ } else {
+ TCGv tmp = tcg_temp_new();
+
+ tcg_gen_andi_i64(tmp, cpu_fir[rb], 0xC0000000);
+ tcg_gen_andi_i64(cpu_fir[rc], cpu_fir[rb], 0x3FFFFFFF);
+ tcg_gen_shli_i64(tmp, tmp, 32);
+ tcg_gen_shli_i64(cpu_fir[rc], cpu_fir[rc], 29);
+ tcg_gen_or_i64(cpu_fir[rc], cpu_fir[rc], tmp);
+
+ tcg_temp_free(tmp);
+ }
+}
+
+static void gen_fcvtql_v(DisasContext *ctx, int rb, int rc)
+{
+ if (rb != 31) {
+ int lab = gen_new_label();
+ TCGv tmp = tcg_temp_new();
+
+ tcg_gen_ext_i32_i64(tmp, cpu_fir[rb]);
+ tcg_gen_brcond_i64(TCG_COND_EQ, tmp, cpu_fir[rb], lab);
+ gen_excp(ctx, EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
+
+ gen_set_label(lab);
+ }
+ gen_fcvtql(rb, rc);
+}
+
#define FARITH2(name) \
static inline void glue(gen_f, name)(int rb, int rc) \
{ \
@@ -612,9 +647,6 @@ static inline void glue(gen_f, name)(int rb, int rc) \
} \
}
FARITH2(cvtlq)
-FARITH2(cvtql)
-FARITH2(cvtql_v)
-FARITH2(cvtql_sv)
/* ??? VAX instruction qualifiers ignored. */
FARITH2(sqrtf)
@@ -2327,11 +2359,12 @@ static inline int translate_one(DisasContext *ctx, uint32_t insn)
break;
case 0x130:
/* CVTQL/V */
- gen_fcvtql_v(rb, rc);
- break;
case 0x530:
/* CVTQL/SV */
- gen_fcvtql_sv(rb, rc);
+ /* ??? I'm pretty sure there's nothing that /sv needs to do that
+ /v doesn't do. The only thing I can think is that /sv is a
+ valid instruction merely for completeness in the ISA. */
+ gen_fcvtql_v(ctx, rb, rc);
break;
default:
goto invalid_opc;
It's a simple mask and shift sequence. Also, fix a typo in the actual masks used. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> --- target-alpha/helper.h | 4 ---- target-alpha/op_helper.c | 20 -------------------- target-alpha/translate.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)