Message ID | 553FC01B.5030802@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Am 28.04.2015 um 19:15 hat Eric Blake geschrieben: > On 04/28/2015 09:00 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> > > > > The block.c file has grown to over 6000 lines. It is time to split this > > file so there are fewer conflicts and the code is easier to maintain. > > > > Extract I/O request processing code: > > * Read > > * Write > > * Zero writes and making the image empty > > * Flush > > * Discard > > * ioctl > > * Tracked requests and queuing > > * Throttling and copy-on-read > > * Block status and allocated functions > > * Refreshing block limits > > * Reading/writing vmstate > > * qemu_blockalign() and friends > > > > The patch simply moves code from block.c into block/io.c. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> > > --- > > block.c | 3394 +++++++-------------------------------------------- > > block/Makefile.objs | 2 +- > > block/io.c | 2540 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 2982 insertions(+), 2954 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 block/io.c > > Kevin, compare your diff to Stefan's: > > > --- > > block.c | 2512 -------------------------------------------------- > > block/Makefile.objs | 2 +- > > block/io.c | 2540 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 2541 insertions(+), 2513 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 block/io.c > > The difference is that Stefan has done 'git config diff.algorithm > patience', which makes for MUCH more legible diffs on a code motion > patch. http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch mentions this as a > hint for a nicer setup. Indeed, it does. I used --patience for reviewing the patch but neglected to add it when sending the pull request. That said, I don't think I could have enabled it for a single patch, and I'm not sure if it's universally better (if so, why wouldn't it be the default?) > At any rate, you've already sent the pull request, so I'm probably too > late; but for the record, here's why I would add: > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> > when reviewing Stefan's version of the patch (the two versions give the > same end result, but my review technique falls flat on Kevin's replay of > the patch) You could apply both series and diff the result if you wanted. But this one was easy enough to review on my own (...famous last words?) Kevin
--- /dev/fd/63 2015-04-28 11:13:24.696901797 -0600 +++ /dev/fd/62 2015-04-28 11:13:24.697901792 -0600 @@ -1,6 +1,38 @@ --- --- a/block.c +++ b/block.c +++ b/block/Makefile.objs +block-obj-y += null.o mirror.o io.o +++ b/block/io.c +/* + * Block layer I/O functions + * + * Copyright (c) 2003 Fabrice Bellard + * + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy + * of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal + * in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights + * to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell + * copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is + * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: + * + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. + * + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, + * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN + * THE SOFTWARE. + */ +