From patchwork Mon Oct 21 14:54:10 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1999985 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hWE+uBv8; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XXJHW5PxSz1xwK for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 01:54:31 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2tnb-0004Mr-IL; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:54:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2tna-0004K3-8n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:54:22 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1t2tnY-0001wq-5Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:54:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1729522459; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EyiNZ6z3fu92x8s6ta38T72vM7G6+vFn17P3Fuu047k=; b=hWE+uBv83+gI0X4HLabnOH2SUjYDZTAf7n6TXG58vPlErMS3CQ7IlJ7ITk8ihw7+LhBnPf iuuHkPKCNY6MJmjducjbiLkDYL4NZMCO/8GF4Jvzt1eNKW5lu7KKZkyV/OBQ+BM0OFnW3S 28YxbIVhqrmdvIcFWO4IcMIbt6LOZx0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-100-4Vi1O_3sM5W212wKijoLow-1; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 10:54:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4Vi1O_3sM5W212wKijoLow-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.17]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C82AC1955F68; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toolbox.redhat.com (unknown [10.42.28.27]) by mx-prod-int-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A94F1955E8F; Mon, 21 Oct 2024 14:54:11 +0000 (UTC) From: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Peter Xu , Brad Smith , Peter Maydell , Fabiano Rosas Subject: [PATCH] util: don't set SO_REUSEADDR on client sockets Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:54:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20241021145410.1420261-1-berrange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.17 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -24 X-Spam_score: -2.5 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.421, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Setting the SO_REUSEADDR property on a socket allows binding to a port number that is in the TIMED_WAIT state. This is usually done on listener sockets, to enable a server to restart itself without having to wait for the completion of TIMED_WAIT on the port. It is also possible, but highly unusual, to set it on client sockets. It is rare to explicitly bind() a client socket, since it is almost always fine to allow the kernel to auto-bind a client socket to a random free port. Most systems will have many 10's of 1000's of free ports that client sockets will be bound to. eg on Linux $ sysctl -a | grep local_port net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 60999 eg on OpenBSD $ sysctl -a | grep net.inet.ip.port net.inet.ip.portfirst=1024 net.inet.ip.portlast=49151 net.inet.ip.porthifirst=49152 net.inet.ip.porthilast=65535 A connected socket must have a unique set of value for (protocol, localip, localport, remoteip, remoteport) otherwise it is liable to get EADDRINUSE. A client connection should trivially avoid EADDRINUSE if letting the kernel auto-assign the 'localport' value, which QEMU always does. When QEMU sets SO_REUSEADDR on a client socket on OpenBSD, however, it upsets this situation. The OpenBSD kernel appears to happily pick a 'localport' that is in the TIMED_WAIT state, even if there are many other available local ports available for use that are not in the TIMED_WAIT state. A test program that just loops opening client sockets will start seeing EADDRINUSE on OpenBSD when as few as 2000 ports are in TIMED_WAIT, despite 10's of 1000's ports still being unused. This contrasts with Linux which appears to avoid picking local ports in TIMED_WAIT state. This problem on OpenBSD exhibits itself periodically with the migration test failing with a message like[1]: qemu-system-ppc64: Failed to connect to '127.0.0.1:24109': Address already in use While I have not been able to reproduce the OpenBSD failure in my own testing, given the scope of what QEMU tests do, it is entirely possible that there could be a lot of ports in TIMED_WAIT state when the migration test runs. Removing SO_REUSEADDR from the client sockets should not affect normal QEMU usage, and should improve reliability on OpenBSD. This use of SO_REUSEADDR on client sockets is highly unusual, and appears to have been present since the very start of the QEMU socket helpers in 2008. The orignal commit has no comment about the use of SO_REUSEADDR on the client, so is most likely just an 16 year old copy+paste bug. [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-10/msg03427.html https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2024-02/msg01572.html Fixes: d247d25f18764402899b37c381bb696a79000b4e Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas --- util/qemu-sockets.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/util/qemu-sockets.c b/util/qemu-sockets.c index 60c44b2b56..80594ecad5 100644 --- a/util/qemu-sockets.c +++ b/util/qemu-sockets.c @@ -367,7 +367,6 @@ static int inet_connect_addr(const InetSocketAddress *saddr, addr->ai_family); return -1; } - socket_set_fast_reuse(sock); /* connect to peer */ do {