From patchwork Mon Aug 26 19:53:15 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Fabiano Rosas X-Patchwork-Id: 1977008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=NnbWdDE+; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=8CkWJnqL; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=NnbWdDE+; dkim=neutral header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.a=ed25519-sha256 header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=8CkWJnqL; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Wt1ds0KnZz1yXd for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 05:56:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sifmh-0007UH-A7; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:53:51 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sifmf-0007Ov-Uk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:53:49 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.223.131]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sifme-0002EX-B4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:53:49 -0400 Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F0151F8AE; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:53:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1724702027; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1ZzH6tbwU1tnRJepeYyskBXA12nUW4vAOqU+UVM33TM=; b=NnbWdDE+cHVnfrXRe1xQqqVRAEPssb4682c7+N4ChE0OjOLJI/rHH7zhRJcn7vQ9CJk8HW cE3zSATTTM+6zvluqWMGIFz+5PDr5ja9vW9ZbTdDncIkTENT2OwGlG+8TdY5d7udw75iai cE9EHK/w70TN+Bc81VTEItrfCWsXcos= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1724702027; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1ZzH6tbwU1tnRJepeYyskBXA12nUW4vAOqU+UVM33TM=; b=8CkWJnqL0DuwO5ZCdMHNA/8MKmIoGQ41LL2Y3VwAcm30XCvhrl/EJuBw9L+hfHOKdI3dn6 kryyELpNH61VCGAw== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=NnbWdDE+; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=8CkWJnqL DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1724702027; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1ZzH6tbwU1tnRJepeYyskBXA12nUW4vAOqU+UVM33TM=; b=NnbWdDE+cHVnfrXRe1xQqqVRAEPssb4682c7+N4ChE0OjOLJI/rHH7zhRJcn7vQ9CJk8HW cE3zSATTTM+6zvluqWMGIFz+5PDr5ja9vW9ZbTdDncIkTENT2OwGlG+8TdY5d7udw75iai cE9EHK/w70TN+Bc81VTEItrfCWsXcos= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1724702027; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1ZzH6tbwU1tnRJepeYyskBXA12nUW4vAOqU+UVM33TM=; b=8CkWJnqL0DuwO5ZCdMHNA/8MKmIoGQ41LL2Y3VwAcm30XCvhrl/EJuBw9L+hfHOKdI3dn6 kryyELpNH61VCGAw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EFC31398D; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id KMtIGUndzGY5PQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:53:45 +0000 From: Fabiano Rosas To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Peter Xu , "Maciej S . Szmigiero" , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mat?= =?utf-8?q?hieu-Daud=C3=A9?= Subject: [PATCH v5 11/18] migration/multifd: Don't send ram data during SYNC Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:53:15 -0300 Message-Id: <20240826195322.16532-12-farosas@suse.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.35.3 In-Reply-To: <20240826195322.16532-1-farosas@suse.de> References: <20240826195322.16532-1-farosas@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0F0151F8AE X-Spam-Score: -3.01 X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.01 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(0.50)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo,suse.de:dkim,suse.de:mid,suse.de:email]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[suse.de:dkim]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+] X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd1.dmz-prg2.suse.org Received-SPF: pass client-ip=195.135.223.131; envelope-from=farosas@suse.de; helo=smtp-out2.suse.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Skip saving and loading any ram data in the packet in the case of a SYNC. This fixes a shortcoming of the current code which requires a reset of the MultiFDPages_t fields right after the previous pending_job finishes, otherwise the very next job might be a SYNC and multifd_send_fill_packet() will put the stale values in the packet. By not calling multifd_ram_fill_packet(), we can stop resetting MultiFDPages_t in the multifd core and leave that to the client code. Actually moving the reset function is not yet done because pages->num==0 is used by the client code to determine whether the MultiFDPages_t needs to be flushed. The subsequent patches will replace that with a generic flag that is not dependent on MultiFDPages_t. Reviewed-by: Peter Xu Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas --- migration/multifd.c | 13 ++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/migration/multifd.c b/migration/multifd.c index d64fcdf4ac..3a164c124d 100644 --- a/migration/multifd.c +++ b/migration/multifd.c @@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ void multifd_send_fill_packet(MultiFDSendParams *p) { MultiFDPacket_t *packet = p->packet; uint64_t packet_num; + bool sync_packet = p->flags & MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC; memset(packet, 0, p->packet_len); @@ -466,7 +467,9 @@ void multifd_send_fill_packet(MultiFDSendParams *p) p->packets_sent++; - multifd_ram_fill_packet(p); + if (!sync_packet) { + multifd_ram_fill_packet(p); + } trace_multifd_send_fill(p->id, packet_num, p->flags, p->next_packet_size); @@ -574,7 +577,9 @@ static int multifd_recv_unfill_packet(MultiFDRecvParams *p, Error **errp) p->packet_num = be64_to_cpu(packet->packet_num); p->packets_recved++; - ret = multifd_ram_unfill_packet(p, errp); + if (!(p->flags & MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC)) { + ret = multifd_ram_unfill_packet(p, errp); + } trace_multifd_recv_unfill(p->id, p->packet_num, p->flags, p->next_packet_size); @@ -1536,7 +1541,9 @@ static void *multifd_recv_thread(void *opaque) flags = p->flags; /* recv methods don't know how to handle the SYNC flag */ p->flags &= ~MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC; - has_data = p->normal_num || p->zero_num; + if (!(flags & MULTIFD_FLAG_SYNC)) { + has_data = p->normal_num || p->zero_num; + } qemu_mutex_unlock(&p->mutex); } else { /*