| Message ID | 20240710074041.85984-1-xiangwencheng@dayudpu.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | vhsot-user: Remove redundant judgment | expand |
On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:40:41PM +0800, BillXiang wrote: > From: BillXiang <xiangwencheng@dayudpu.com> > > Send only once has been supported in vhost_user_write by vhost_user_per_device_request > > Signed-off-by: BillXiang <xiangwencheng@dayudpu.com> I am confused by all the patches. Is it on top of your other patch or instead of? Because that one added the vq index check. If we are going to check vq index it's likely cleaner to always check it. And again, typos do not inspire confidence. How was this tested? > --- > hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > index 00561daa06..04e3568b7e 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > @@ -446,11 +446,6 @@ static int vhost_user_set_log_base(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t base, > .hdr.size = sizeof(msg.payload.log), > }; > > - /* Send only once with first queue pair */ > - if (dev->vq_index != 0) { > - return 0; > - } > - > if (shmfd && log->fd != -1) { > fds[fd_num++] = log->fd; > } > -- > 2.30.0
> From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"<mst@redhat.com> > Date: Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 03:14 > Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhsot-user: Remove redundant judgment > To: "BillXiang"<xiangwencheng@dayudpu.com> > Cc: <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <alex.bennee@linaro.org> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 03:40:41PM +0800, BillXiang wrote: > > From: BillXiang <xiangwencheng@dayudpu.com> > > > > Send only once has been supported in vhost_user_write by vhost_user_per_device_request > > > > Signed-off-by: BillXiang <xiangwencheng@dayudpu.com> > > I am confused by all the patches. Is it on top of your > other patch or instead of? Because that one added > the vq index check. > If we are going to check vq index it's likely cleaner to > always check it. > Yes, it's on top of commit 7c211eb078c4 ("vhost-user: Skip unnecessary duplicated VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_BASE requests") , and the check has been done in vhost_user_write after VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_BASE be added to vhost_user_per_device_request. > And again, typos do not inspire confidence. How was this tested? > > > --- > > hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 5 ----- > > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > > index 00561daa06..04e3568b7e 100644 > > --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > > +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c > > @@ -446,11 +446,6 @@ static int vhost_user_set_log_base(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t base, > > .hdr.size = sizeof(msg.payload.log), > > }; > > > > - /* Send only once with first queue pair */ > > - if (dev->vq_index != 0) { > > - return 0; > > - } > > - > > if (shmfd && log->fd != -1) { > > fds[fd_num++] = log->fd; > > } > > -- > > 2.30.0
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index 00561daa06..04e3568b7e 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c @@ -446,11 +446,6 @@ static int vhost_user_set_log_base(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint64_t base, .hdr.size = sizeof(msg.payload.log), }; - /* Send only once with first queue pair */ - if (dev->vq_index != 0) { - return 0; - } - if (shmfd && log->fd != -1) { fds[fd_num++] = log->fd; }