From patchwork Wed Jun 12 13:01:32 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Stefano Garzarella X-Patchwork-Id: 1946874 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=C36yp+Pn; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Vzm6R18Pbz20KL for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 23:07:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNcl-0004z9-Hw; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:02:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNcj-0004oV-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:02:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHNci-00085L-Ap for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:02:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1718197363; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=omq0CP5he99OGK2yfFFh7e+anHH7U6JGORMDNNdU/Yw=; b=C36yp+PngYLGI6xRkp5rEyOE8wq6Mzw9O/l8gJ1ijZ2iBMY+9Su7rlnj5o4j86uUcIGKau 68Z2Wn44rEIMv66ons+0vz5MkP4Ke8itpNNF+9zqNArQ66mXIcIOL9HFSudGzBMMj6qFS7 8SpzqWDYF/Yr0ztIx+o+KcPp8CHGqOQ= Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-618-CBramQ5bNLKYikemXjWDvg-1; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 09:02:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: CBramQ5bNLKYikemXjWDvg-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7955f8b4bcfso247174785a.3 for ; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:02:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718197361; x=1718802161; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=omq0CP5he99OGK2yfFFh7e+anHH7U6JGORMDNNdU/Yw=; b=B5TWH9rF72l1iK1fDNu5LDPUmJ1NqgSNm0Nf0S1AD/bWkojMC4yRIIYn19A21+L1D1 pkeB53jTocN6Ql/kqCuqLxMgm4tJrM+pZ3XC/dOHRRPWYKN63df6rs29vvSkpf+hjJ98 nqQ9mQKKQTcce1illJUyLeJ+eZX43Ziq3DeMXiwEm4C/H4ENKbriYV+p5EOpQntsc1Tc 2dG70gkg+Ylx+JQHjKt0Az+d2ncRKoBgaeiIXH6WD3b6wU7JLBEHGx8IqcUY9Yekl/bj qOpO77K71b4/LetxoyubHrGHFETXfmVQ/F5T1qkqErAIR4o1rCQD4orUW271Po76OsNp Tljg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXYGB7vumvkH5RFQBefoWl1a2PZxOyklnlEHclwH9W4Nz3vZw7vOnMPCiqxRIm4gPyDk1NM8P4lveK5NQhv2/jL8i8y604= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyomteqw8VTS5qeZak19DFUbjOveU2UxzWs1KvL8qbtdMGrxfdu PyJXXzW0dmSsjhjjx42FTbEyu7V/c9umsw+GI88rfn63i6l+VUe+dLf5PbnRzySQPOZzDjp9tP8 UDa6vCcxzPsF8C+pXyunkwmvp2SS14DH8jk0OoRlxc5wQVeiTO+p7 X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:258b:b0:795:5d6f:8bbd with SMTP id af79cd13be357-797f613d22emr202984985a.73.1718197361323; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:02:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHHpTjWc/xjAx6/et7Wama94T4aqW8tZbAGLUMl7jPrJ5idIez/XUss2R4MdT1ntNwZU9N9xA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:258b:b0:795:5d6f:8bbd with SMTP id af79cd13be357-797f613d22emr202980385a.73.1718197360870; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:02:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from step1.redhat.com ([193.207.132.52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-79532813a4fsm599132885a.13.2024.06.12.06.02.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Jun 2024 06:02:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Stefano Garzarella To: mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, Hanna Reitz , Brad Smith , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , =?utf-8?q?Marc?= =?utf-8?q?-Andr=C3=A9_Lureau?= , Laurent Vivier , gmaglione@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, Coiby Xu , Gerd Hoffmann , slp@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov , Raphael Norwitz , Thomas Huth , Eduardo Habkost , David Hildenbrand , Kevin Wolf , Paolo Bonzini , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , Jason Wang , Markus Armbruster , Eric Blake , Stefano Garzarella Subject: [PATCH RESEND v7 04/12] vhost-user-server: do not set memory fd non-blocking Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 15:01:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20240612130140.63004-5-sgarzare@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2 In-Reply-To: <20240612130140.63004-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> References: <20240612130140.63004-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=sgarzare@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.143, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org In vhost-user-server we set all fd received from the other peer in non-blocking mode. For some of them (e.g. memfd, shm_open, etc.) it's not really needed, because we don't use these fd with blocking operations, but only to map memory. In addition, in some systems this operation can fail (e.g. in macOS setting an fd returned by shm_open() non-blocking fails with errno = ENOTTY). So, let's avoid setting fd non-blocking for those messages that we know carry memory fd (e.g. VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG, VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE). Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé Acked-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella --- v3: - avoiding setting fd non-blocking for messages where we have memory fd (Eric) --- util/vhost-user-server.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/util/vhost-user-server.c b/util/vhost-user-server.c index 3bfb1ad3ec..b19229074a 100644 --- a/util/vhost-user-server.c +++ b/util/vhost-user-server.c @@ -65,6 +65,18 @@ static void vmsg_close_fds(VhostUserMsg *vmsg) static void vmsg_unblock_fds(VhostUserMsg *vmsg) { int i; + + /* + * These messages carry fd used to map memory, not to send/receive messages, + * so this operation is useless. In addition, in some systems this + * operation can fail (e.g. in macOS setting an fd returned by shm_open() + * non-blocking fails with errno = ENOTTY) + */ + if (vmsg->request == VHOST_USER_ADD_MEM_REG || + vmsg->request == VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE) { + return; + } + for (i = 0; i < vmsg->fd_num; i++) { qemu_socket_set_nonblock(vmsg->fds[i]); }