diff mbox series

[v5,5/5] target/ppc: Fix regression due to Power10 and Power11 having same PCR

Message ID 20240606121657.254308-6-adityag@linux.ibm.com
State New
Headers show
Series Power11 support for QEMU [PSeries] | expand

Commit Message

Aditya Gupta June 6, 2024, 12:16 p.m. UTC
Power11 has the same PCR (Processor Compatibility Register) value, as
Power10.

Due to this, QEMU considers Power11 as a valid compat-mode for Power10,
ie. earlier it was possible to run QEMU with '-M pseries,max-compat-mode=power11 --cpu power10'

Same PCR also introduced a regression where `-M pseries --cpu power10`
boots as Power11 (ie. logical PVR is of Power11, even though PVR is Power10).
The regression was due to 'do_client_architecture_support' checking for
valid compat modes and finding Power11 to be a valid compat mode for
Power10 (it happens even without passing 'max-compat-mode' explicitly).

Fix compat-mode issue and regression, by ensuring a future Power
processor (with a higher logical_pvr value, eg. P11) cannot be valid
compat-mode for an older Power processor (eg. P10)

Cc: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Cc: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
---
 target/ppc/compat.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Nicholas Piggin July 23, 2024, 4:58 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu Jun 6, 2024 at 10:16 PM AEST, Aditya Gupta wrote:
> Power11 has the same PCR (Processor Compatibility Register) value, as
> Power10.
>
> Due to this, QEMU considers Power11 as a valid compat-mode for Power10,
> ie. earlier it was possible to run QEMU with '-M pseries,max-compat-mode=power11 --cpu power10'

Isn't this expected to work, or no?

>
> Same PCR also introduced a regression where `-M pseries --cpu power10`
> boots as Power11 (ie. logical PVR is of Power11, even though PVR is Power10).
> The regression was due to 'do_client_architecture_support' checking for
> valid compat modes and finding Power11 to be a valid compat mode for
> Power10 (it happens even without passing 'max-compat-mode' explicitly).
>
> Fix compat-mode issue and regression, by ensuring a future Power
> processor (with a higher logical_pvr value, eg. P11) cannot be valid
> compat-mode for an older Power processor (eg. P10)

This should be done before introducing the Power11 CPU so there's no
regression inside the series.

>
> Cc: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
> Cc: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target/ppc/compat.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/compat.c b/target/ppc/compat.c
> index 12dd8ae290ca..168a3c06316f 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/compat.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/compat.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ static bool pcc_compat(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t compat_pvr,
>          /* Outside specified range */
>          return false;
>      }
> +    if (compat->pvr > pcc->logical_pvr) {
> +        /* Older CPU cannot support a newer processor's compat mode */
> +        return false;
> +    }

Hmm. I suppose this is the right way to fix it.

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

>      if (!(pcc->pcr_supported & compat->pcr_level)) {
>          /* Not supported by this CPU */
>          return false;
Aditya Gupta July 23, 2024, 5:08 a.m. UTC | #2
On 23/07/24 10:28, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu Jun 6, 2024 at 10:16 PM AEST, Aditya Gupta wrote:
>> Power11 has the same PCR (Processor Compatibility Register) value, as
>> Power10.
>>
>> Due to this, QEMU considers Power11 as a valid compat-mode for Power10,
>> ie. earlier it was possible to run QEMU with '-M pseries,max-compat-mode=power11 --cpu power10'
> Isn't this expected to work, or no?

It works, but it didn't feel logical to be able to boot an older CPU in 
a compat mode of a newer CPU.

Major reason though, it caused regression where `-M pseries --cpu 
power10` was booting as Power11, since Power11 was the highest PCR it 
found as compatible.

The only issue I see in this patch is the assumption that a newer 
processor must always have a higher PVR value, which is true as of now.


>
>> Same PCR also introduced a regression where `-M pseries --cpu power10`
>> boots as Power11 (ie. logical PVR is of Power11, even though PVR is Power10).
>> The regression was due to 'do_client_architecture_support' checking for
>> valid compat modes and finding Power11 to be a valid compat mode for
>> Power10 (it happens even without passing 'max-compat-mode' explicitly).
>>
>> Fix compat-mode issue and regression, by ensuring a future Power
>> processor (with a higher logical_pvr value, eg. P11) cannot be valid
>> compat-mode for an older Power processor (eg. P10)
> This should be done before introducing the Power11 CPU so there's no
> regression inside the series.

Sure, I will move it before the 'Add Power11 DD2.0 processor' patch.

>> Cc: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>> Cc: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aditya Gupta <adityag@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   target/ppc/compat.c | 4 ++++
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/ppc/compat.c b/target/ppc/compat.c
>> index 12dd8ae290ca..168a3c06316f 100644
>> --- a/target/ppc/compat.c
>> +++ b/target/ppc/compat.c
>> @@ -139,6 +139,10 @@ static bool pcc_compat(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t compat_pvr,
>>           /* Outside specified range */
>>           return false;
>>       }
>> +    if (compat->pvr > pcc->logical_pvr) {
>> +        /* Older CPU cannot support a newer processor's compat mode */
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
> Hmm. I suppose this is the right way to fix it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

Thank you for the tag, Nick !


- Aditya Gupta

>>       if (!(pcc->pcr_supported & compat->pcr_level)) {
>>           /* Not supported by this CPU */
>>           return false;
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/target/ppc/compat.c b/target/ppc/compat.c
index 12dd8ae290ca..168a3c06316f 100644
--- a/target/ppc/compat.c
+++ b/target/ppc/compat.c
@@ -139,6 +139,10 @@  static bool pcc_compat(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t compat_pvr,
         /* Outside specified range */
         return false;
     }
+    if (compat->pvr > pcc->logical_pvr) {
+        /* Older CPU cannot support a newer processor's compat mode */
+        return false;
+    }
     if (!(pcc->pcr_supported & compat->pcr_level)) {
         /* Not supported by this CPU */
         return false;