From patchwork Thu Feb 29 14:39:05 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Zhao Liu X-Patchwork-Id: 1906352 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=HOZEM7hN; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Tltp95zW3z23fC for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 01:26:57 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfhMJ-0006Im-7G; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:26:03 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfhMD-0006AL-U2; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:25:58 -0500 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.11]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rfhMC-0005O2-E1; Thu, 29 Feb 2024 09:25:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1709216756; x=1740752756; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IatmqCQ9vAXDypTdX08RatHXOY9Ba/YtMXNoadKHz2M=; b=HOZEM7hN3MK+6WxbW9kBj6fF2PSOnv3dZIv12jfmOzmqKakrVEtTzGnW lIdRKEkg9oYHy8b7+a2K3ltLqgYLV1OmskXZHQM6GsXrb6vuviIEkT5Wd fytwfNhrXoylr70q+knK+BQ3yZP7QYLnoecrrokaF7rrMd6tDgCo/uLdX jNUQmb7VyY+vJ/W5LjLtQHu8ODn92civrBCNIkPE0PVFZlnobOB3UPS0T +sNsq9nK1SDl7r1Rt97tUESvnYjdsD2yb7Y2h7p187GEJm+hhr2WC+F4W D2ypI3BSgEGiTJZemEyej7FNdgigJo1ySIggKGjqkMOloGoETZVcZRBIO g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10998"; a="14322786" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,194,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="14322786" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Feb 2024 06:25:55 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,194,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="7793845" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com ([10.239.160.36]) by fmviesa010.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Feb 2024 06:25:53 -0800 From: Zhao Liu To: Markus Armbruster , Michael Roth , Michael Tokarev , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Zhao Liu , Alex Williamson , =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric_Le_Goat?= =?utf-8?q?er?= Subject: [PATCH 08/17] hw/vfio/iommufd: Fix missing ERRP_GUARD() for error_prepend() Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 22:39:05 +0800 Message-Id: <20240229143914.1977550-9-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240229143914.1977550-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> References: <20240229143914.1977550-1-zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Received-SPF: none client-ip=192.198.163.11; envelope-from=zhao1.liu@linux.intel.com; helo=mgamail.intel.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.096, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org From: Zhao Liu As the comment in qapi/error, passing @errp to error_prepend() requires ERRP_GUARD(): * = Why, when and how to use ERRP_GUARD() = * * Without ERRP_GUARD(), use of the @errp parameter is restricted: ... * - It should not be passed to error_prepend(), error_vprepend() or * error_append_hint(), because that doesn't work with &error_fatal. * ERRP_GUARD() lifts these restrictions. * * To use ERRP_GUARD(), add it right at the beginning of the function. * @errp can then be used without worrying about the argument being * NULL or &error_fatal. ERRP_GUARD() could avoid the case when @errp is the pointer of error_fatal, the user can't see this additional information, because exit() happens in error_setg earlier than information is added [1]. The iommufd_cdev_getfd() passes @errp to error_prepend(). Its @errp is from vfio_attach_device(), which @errp parameter is so widely sourced that it is necessary to protect it with ERRP_GUARD(). To avoid the issue like [1] said, add missing ERRP_GUARD() at the beginning of this function. [1]: Issue description in the commit message of commit ae7c80a7bd73 ("error: New macro ERRP_GUARD()"). Cc: Alex Williamson Cc: "Cédric Le Goater" Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater --- hw/vfio/iommufd.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c index 9bfddc136089..7baf49e6ee9e 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/iommufd.c +++ b/hw/vfio/iommufd.c @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static void iommufd_cdev_unbind_and_disconnect(VFIODevice *vbasedev) static int iommufd_cdev_getfd(const char *sysfs_path, Error **errp) { + ERRP_GUARD(); long int ret = -ENOTTY; char *path, *vfio_dev_path = NULL, *vfio_path = NULL; DIR *dir = NULL;