From patchwork Wed Feb 7 21:56:06 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kevin Wolf X-Patchwork-Id: 1896347 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=SwjqBSh3; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TVYrq725Qz23h2 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:58:03 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXpuC-0007EO-4q; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:56:32 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXpuA-0007CX-5U for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:56:30 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rXpu8-0007fu-HB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:56:29 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1707342987; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v5hLZjXPLz2i52+WyQndxjGB7fi9mqlD8TwVgMsKkE4=; b=SwjqBSh3o+x3NqMEu2gXL92qbUJejme3IT6V5r20EDLrqUgwaYg6TtvyuPc/3EyzsbLmFT 11Yv9DmdiyDYpuV7aJVasW/Qh+G14PRY1J97YMi1Tm3gehE4hHorhDU+OuofKV/m50YH1m 1LpPrjklHLP42H6GmWbcw4KgdKsx0BI= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-497-oEWy9C-dPea95u43nFg6Fg-1; Wed, 07 Feb 2024 16:56:24 -0500 X-MC-Unique: oEWy9C-dPea95u43nFg6Fg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6360E8F4126; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 21:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merkur.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.31]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB172492BC6; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 21:56:23 +0000 (UTC) From: Kevin Wolf To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 16/16] virtio-blk: avoid using ioeventfd state in irqfd conditional Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:56:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20240207215606.206038-17-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240207215606.206038-1-kwolf@redhat.com> References: <20240207215606.206038-1-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.9 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -21 X-Spam_score: -2.2 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.106, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org From: Stefan Hajnoczi Requests that complete in an IOThread use irqfd to notify the guest while requests that complete in the main loop thread use the traditional qdev irq code path. The reason for this conditional is that the irq code path requires the BQL: if (s->ioeventfd_started && !s->ioeventfd_disabled) { virtio_notify_irqfd(vdev, req->vq); } else { virtio_notify(vdev, req->vq); } There is a corner case where the conditional invokes the irq code path instead of the irqfd code path: static void virtio_blk_stop_ioeventfd(VirtIODevice *vdev) { ... /* * Set ->ioeventfd_started to false before draining so that host notifiers * are not detached/attached anymore. */ s->ioeventfd_started = false; /* Wait for virtio_blk_dma_restart_bh() and in flight I/O to complete */ blk_drain(s->conf.conf.blk); During blk_drain() the conditional produces the wrong result because ioeventfd_started is false. Use qemu_in_iothread() instead of checking the ioeventfd state. Buglink: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-15394 Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20240122172625.415386-1-stefanha@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf --- hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c index 4ca5e632ea..738cb2ac36 100644 --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_req_complete(VirtIOBlockReq *req, unsigned char status) iov_discard_undo(&req->inhdr_undo); iov_discard_undo(&req->outhdr_undo); virtqueue_push(req->vq, &req->elem, req->in_len); - if (s->ioeventfd_started && !s->ioeventfd_disabled) { + if (qemu_in_iothread()) { virtio_notify_irqfd(vdev, req->vq); } else { virtio_notify(vdev, req->vq);