From patchwork Thu Nov 9 22:53:01 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matthew Rosato X-Patchwork-Id: 1862270 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=SxddOmCD; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SRHM32cd4z1yQy for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:54:06 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1Dtn-000247-AL; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 17:53:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1Dtk-00022s-UF; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 17:53:17 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1r1Dtg-0001fa-Aj; Thu, 09 Nov 2023 17:53:16 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3A9Mepfe028330; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:53:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=jIQ+XSSeTwjc7+bZbWrfJ/RU5+15EXIq9VHvvU7dA1Q=; b=SxddOmCDFwLIYSyUAn8kxxGqJXWTYWaq/En33EvQmiXyvDE9IuUcXzqvJtHRG66Ml/8Q JvJQo2ou7FZZKNaD3WpvupNlU5a8kYkknQRF3CfixjHf0tD1AktQDEWe93+JfxRgv7Ia 9jIrvLFTWeHcOOLboLVCzuxDMa/PggF5kxO6DL032mvXRuRGaUzDUKzN8jR9gA8e4fQj twM2dvLysiWTgAtxNjoiGW4PjLEtgoVqR1ywghxcjrX6bgxCoxjKRY6K8k9sqZavXXUp uZXwnf8/JOuwQX97ZXl+w4XMMqQE4H2ChsB1dIiqg2GCT1gQhY9avXRK4EX6WPbMqnFZ Tg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u97n71fkt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 22:53:08 +0000 Received: from m0353726.ppops.net (m0353726.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 3A9MhIG0004180; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:53:08 GMT Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u97n71fke-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 22:53:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3A9M2Z3A004176; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:53:07 GMT Received: from smtprelay02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.69]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3u7w21700t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Nov 2023 22:53:07 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.229]) by smtprelay02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 3A9Mr6H712452384 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:53:06 GMT Received: from smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3132F58059; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:53:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8D45805D; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:53:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-2311da4c-2e09-11b2-a85c-c003041e9174.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.61.66.47]) by smtpav02.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 9 Nov 2023 22:53:04 +0000 (GMT) From: Matthew Rosato To: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, clg@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, iii@linux.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] s390x/pci: bypass vfio DMA counting when using cdev Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 17:53:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20231109225302.401344-2-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20231109225302.401344-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> References: <20231109225302.401344-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 0beZ_NOun9CY_jEysd50ghd93XcZYT6k X-Proofpoint-GUID: 60-SeHEebSIi4BY-HsYfOujVMQShwobp X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.272,Aquarius:18.0.987,Hydra:6.0.619,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-11-09_16,2023-11-09_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=670 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2311060000 definitions=main-2311090167 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org The current code assumes that there is always a vfio group, but that's no longer guaranteed with the iommufd backend when using cdev. In this case, we don't need to track the vfio dma limit anyway. Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato --- hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c index 59a2e03873..7218583883 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c @@ -66,7 +66,11 @@ S390PCIDMACount *s390_pci_start_dma_count(S390pciState *s, assert(vpdev); - id = vpdev->vbasedev.group->container->fd; + if (vpdev->vbasedev.group) { + id = vpdev->vbasedev.group->container->fd; + } else { + return NULL; + } if (!s390_pci_update_dma_avail(id, &avail)) { return NULL;