From patchwork Tue Oct 24 13:12:29 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Juan Quintela X-Patchwork-Id: 1854369 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=akIfDFI8; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4SFCGp4y3yz23jn for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:15:30 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHEK-0003zW-Nn; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:13:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHE9-0003iN-BV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:13:46 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvHE5-00011k-V2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:13:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1698153221; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0wLme3tPLHrsytkaTz20AbsMQdVkg50xoNnDIj0EyAo=; b=akIfDFI8YoMp5YvPLXzGNZg+gSlxjU5uB/7rC5Ihd55ctaXlnUIefHJbNyc+dhdqyFS2H5 OGinP4kUuASdfAXQ1Sfsw5NzF4cuBXyZx2P8xOojR0kYHmfsV5rsjzFe8zf22qYR4+p0KR kEkHDwS0niLUqNty74yALxr1zO73juo= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-39-_frJOCvMP2uPEtxuXDXUUA-1; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:13:38 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _frJOCvMP2uPEtxuXDXUUA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB51811E7B; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from secure.mitica (unknown [10.39.194.127]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2E41C060BA; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:13:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Juan Quintela To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Eric Blake , Richard Henderson , Corey Minyard , Li Zhijian , Marcel Apfelbaum , Hanna Reitz , John Snow , David Gibson , Gerd Hoffmann , Stefan Hajnoczi , Halil Pasic , Peter Maydell , Corey Minyard , Mark Cave-Ayland , Kevin Wolf , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?q?C=C3=A9dric?= =?utf-8?q?_Le_Goater?= , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, libvir-list@redhat.com, Stefan Weil , Nicholas Piggin , Daniel Henrique Barboza , =?utf-8?q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9_?= =?utf-8?q?Lureau?= , Peter Xu , Leonardo Bras , Jason Wang , Fam Zheng , Christian Borntraeger , David Hildenbrand , Thomas Huth , Fabiano Rosas , Ilya Leoshkevich , Harsh Prateek Bora , Samuel Thibault , Eric Farman , Juan Quintela , Markus Armbruster , Stefan Berger , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 03/39] migration/doc: How to migrate when hosts have different features Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:12:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20231024131305.87468-4-quintela@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20231024131305.87468-1-quintela@redhat.com> References: <20231024131305.87468-1-quintela@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=quintela@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sometimes devices have different features depending of things outside of qemu. For instance the kernel. Document how to handle that cases. Acked-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Message-ID: <20231018112827.1325-4-quintela@redhat.com> --- docs/devel/migration.rst | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/devel/migration.rst b/docs/devel/migration.rst index 6fe275b1ec..974505e4a7 100644 --- a/docs/devel/migration.rst +++ b/docs/devel/migration.rst @@ -1138,3 +1138,100 @@ machine types to have the right value:: + { "virtio-blk-device", "num-queues", "1"}, ... }; + +A device with diferent features on both sides +--------------------------------------------- + +Let's assume that we are using the same QEMU binary on both sides, +just to make the things easier. But we have a device that has +different features on both sides of the migration. That can be +because the devices are different, because the kernel driver of both +devices have different features, whatever. + +How can we get this to work with migration. The way to do that is +"theoretically" easy. You have to get the features that the device +has in the source of the migration. The features that the device has +on the target of the migration, you get the intersection of the +features of both sides, and that is the way that you should launch +QEMU. + +Notice that this is not completely related to QEMU. The most +important thing here is that this should be handled by the managing +application that launches QEMU. If QEMU is configured correctly, the +migration will succeed. + +That said, actually doing it is complicated. Almost all devices are +bad at being able to be launched with only some features enabled. +With one big exception: cpus. + +You can read the documentation for QEMU x86 cpu models here: + +https://qemu-project.gitlab.io/qemu/system/qemu-cpu-models.html + +See when they talk about migration they recommend that one chooses the +newest cpu model that is supported for all cpus. + +Let's say that we have: + +Host A: + +Device X has the feature Y + +Host B: + +Device X has not the feature Y + +If we try to migrate without any care from host A to host B, it will +fail because when migration tries to load the feature Y on +destination, it will find that the hardware is not there. + +Doing this would be the equivalent of doing with cpus: + +Host A: + +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host + +Host B: + +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host + +When both hosts have different cpu features this is guaranteed to +fail. Especially if Host B has less features than host A. If host A +has less features than host B, sometimes it works. Important word of +last sentence is "sometimes". + +So, forgetting about cpu models and continuing with the -cpu host +example, let's see that the differences of the cpus is that Host A and +B have the following features: + +Features: 'pcid' 'stibp' 'taa-no' +Host A: X X +Host B: X + +And we want to migrate between them, the way configure both QEMU cpu +will be: + +Host A: + +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host,pcid=off,stibp=off + +Host B: + +$ qemu-system-x86_64 -cpu host,taa-no=off + +And you would be able to migrate between them. It is responsability +of the management application or of the user to make sure that the +configuration is correct. QEMU doesn't know how to look at this kind +of features in general. + +Notice that we don't recomend to use -cpu host for migration. It is +used in this example because it makes the example simpler. + +Other devices have worse control about individual features. If they +want to be able to migrate between hosts that show different features, +the device needs a way to configure which ones it is going to use. + +In this section we have considered that we are using the same QEMU +binary in both sides of the migration. If we use different QEMU +versions process, then we need to have into account all other +differences and the examples become even more complicated.