From patchwork Fri Sep 29 13:45:51 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Huth X-Patchwork-Id: 1841308 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=ERLdk5gr; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=patchwork.ozlabs.org) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rxs8J3Frsz1yp0 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:46:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmDor-0001wR-A7; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:46:13 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmDom-0001vy-IJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:46:11 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmDog-0003jr-2R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:46:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695995155; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GsuXEh6bWMGHNQUXAsUnTZljHIGwUss0GAlCMqkxxFA=; b=ERLdk5grEekZYITWji9WNXCk1ucKGTUuWWoLrf4SeHrk64NoBHwki/tmmMcHXXDF000KfV xDP2ztk4WTJlDN7tj3Y0BNyns8WhjBAH5+ZGQT3WJmYtWF1cLFbORMDU3SNyp7d1jkM7dn EeZgYZ+b//Cu/EROVRaKkoE9u+TrRho= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-580-Q0P4epRXNH23GU3Nwk2u8w-1; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 09:45:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Q0P4epRXNH23GU3Nwk2u8w-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8ABE82810D5D; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:45:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thuth-p1g4.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.194]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177614171CD; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 13:45:52 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Huth To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Markus Armbruster Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add a general architecture section for x86 Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:45:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20230929134551.395438-1-thuth@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=thuth@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: 12 X-Spam_score: 1.2 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org It's a little bit weird that the files in target/i386/ which are not in a subfolder there do not have any associated maintainer (and thus nobody might be CC:-ed on changes to these files). We should have a general x86 section for these files, similar to what we already have for s390x and mips. Since Paolo is already listed as maintainer for both, the x86 KVM and TCG CPUs, I'd like to suggest him as maintainer for the general files, too. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth --- Richard, being listed as x86 TCG CPU maintainer, do you want to be listed here, too? MAINTAINERS | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 3914bbd85b..5b4ab7d142 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -131,6 +131,17 @@ K: ^Subject:.*(?i)mips F: docs/system/target-mips.rst F: configs/targets/mips* +X86 general architecture support +M: Paolo Bonzini +S: Maintained +F: configs/devices/i386-softmmu/default.mak +F: configs/targets/i386-softmmu.mak +F: configs/targets/x86_64-softmmu.mak +F: docs/system/target-i386* +F: target/i386/*.[ch] +F: target/i386/Kconfig +F: target/i386/meson.build + Guest CPU cores (TCG) --------------------- Overall TCG CPUs