From patchwork Tue Jul 4 08:12:28 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ilya Leoshkevich X-Patchwork-Id: 1803101 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=ToetNb1t; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QwGMt68TMz20b1 for ; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 18:35:53 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGbUr-0008Or-LQ; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:34:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGbUp-0008Na-DL; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:34:51 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGbUn-0006tm-H0; Tue, 04 Jul 2023 04:34:51 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3648TSeF006692; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:34:45 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=gWUr78dlDqo6B8EAz/Tw6Iqt9Hwj7yHVzYaJbnQTsX8=; b=ToetNb1tA1XePl7NA+G9E8UV2vV4OAziIKXh7Uj4K9kaAXhesZOCET6jmbxiYo5tKtym TCn+SrlqNQu+WNfu3E3xkQBkP9AcSzQxaOtzE/quGvHxeWcV/0OkOFzY4OqXlc7zWA38 /Dzf7le3oY0yJ0PpMyfj/kRiYEH+MY9d/t3sHp/f3egDPf+/LuHc9b4GITl/2lZD8eYz M52GVo9mdOE0F3ySu0Pk8c5SEjYcrGLwdNZgiogLxDrP7eZx3oLnEYHHAE7A3NM6cH29 3szB6n0TSBnZSkGOjG46itY0MRr0EX7ex1G0paYzRBQ5BmD1+UDoe+Qby/FGWuzok8ld Zg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rmfsbrk1b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 Jul 2023 08:34:45 +0000 Received: from m0360083.ppops.net (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 3648SS7Y030428; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:34:44 GMT Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rmfsbrjy5-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 Jul 2023 08:34:44 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 3642rW8t018938; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:15:25 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3rjbs4swmn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 04 Jul 2023 08:15:25 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.104]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 3648FNP415729224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:15:23 GMT Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F5C20040; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:15:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B912004B; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:15:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heavy.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.179.30.217]) by smtpav05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:15:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: Laurent Vivier , Richard Henderson , David Hildenbrand Cc: Thomas Huth , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, Ilya Leoshkevich , qemu-stable@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] target/s390x: Fix MVCRL with a large value in R0 Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 10:12:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20230704081506.276055-5-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.41.0 In-Reply-To: <20230704081506.276055-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230704081506.276055-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: a2cv-7E6V57zzet0hfgdVo3oF_O4-ECH X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: bQDMm9Ag6ar4R37n2U2dKV5XwtrCoM8T X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-07-04_05,2023-06-30_01,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2305260000 definitions=main-2307040070 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=iii@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Using a large R0 causes an assertion error: qemu-s390x: target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c:183: access_prepare_nf: Assertion `size > 0 && size <= 4096' failed. Even though PoP explicitly advises against using more than 8 bits for the size, an emulator crash is never a good thing. Fix by truncating the size to 8 bits. Fixes: ea0a1053e276 ("s390x/tcg: Implement Miscellaneous-Instruction-Extensions Facility 3 for the s390x") Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich --- target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c index d02ec861d8b..84ad85212c9 100644 --- a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c +++ b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ void HELPER(mvcrl)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t l, uint64_t dest, uint64_t src) int32_t i; /* MVCRL always copies one more byte than specified - maximum is 256 */ + l &= 0xff; l++; access_prepare(&srca, env, src, l, MMU_DATA_LOAD, mmu_idx, ra);