From patchwork Thu May 11 11:46:50 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ilya Leoshkevich X-Patchwork-Id: 1779978 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=IVfXdVTu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QH99j3rTMz214M for ; Thu, 11 May 2023 21:47:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px4lJ-0005e2-8J; Thu, 11 May 2023 07:47:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px4lH-0005dQ-IN; Thu, 11 May 2023 07:47:07 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px4lF-0006zG-Nu; Thu, 11 May 2023 07:47:07 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 34BBgAjW008865; Thu, 11 May 2023 11:47:02 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=fI+6G89R4+TwOY8g1LVbhz+kgI5ZTj3L+LeVjphJIo0=; b=IVfXdVTuTJIvVjXEbNvHowrRqz/Xo1/wsA4Dcl4iS2QCJtMxsQxpNsHa3OLnqURS338q PWqJWqmx10ZDIxVNZAIjfq4sRi7asKjjpq79+C/DPA7UGIKsw3OgymYMrJTr55YDsYDE In050c1meunylgMfVbbyGJMjOB4F0lekFHyxP+35rajOrIAPmHCpBO0h70QCx+dXl4W1 o9qFlxBNAFEvO1Xr03y78fD3PH+tQ7cTEMlTAo25IayJKXJYRNR0UvZvEwVYvOSjBnMf 5C6PopwSS6nTpskFMJm6VLkLKBwqmP8QBon/wnncP0FfdOUGRd8muE4A1wREO2uMU9ka Gg== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qgyqdg57h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 May 2023 11:47:02 +0000 Received: from m0356517.ppops.net (m0356517.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 34BBgOG5009400; Thu, 11 May 2023 11:47:02 GMT Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qgyqdg569-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 May 2023 11:47:01 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 34B7Y2MO013391; Thu, 11 May 2023 11:46:59 GMT Received: from smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.224]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qf7d1sc9r-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 11 May 2023 11:46:59 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.105]) by smtprelay03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 34BBkuFn56426968 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 May 2023 11:46:56 GMT Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6ED020049; Thu, 11 May 2023 11:46:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C17220040; Thu, 11 May 2023 11:46:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from heavy.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.171.14.79]) by smtpav06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 May 2023 11:46:56 +0000 (GMT) From: Ilya Leoshkevich To: =?utf-8?q?Alex_Benn=C3=A9e?= , "Richard Henderson" , "David Hildenbrand" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, =?utf-8?q?Thomas_Wei=C3=9F?= =?utf-8?q?schuh?= , "Peter Maydell" , Ilya Leoshkevich Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] tests/tcg/multiarch: Make the system memory test work on big-endian Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:46:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20230511114651.439872-2-iii@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 In-Reply-To: <20230511114651.439872-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> References: <20230511114651.439872-1-iii@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Hk8epc7K0zawtYlfoLXFh1ESOtAxe6-6 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 9bTNOxPvhAnJTSTCRQZdzW6eb1FD2Ybn X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.942,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.170.22 definitions=2023-05-11_08,2023-05-05_01,2023-02-09_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2304280000 definitions=main-2305110099 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=iii@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Store the bytes in descending order on big-endian. Invert the logic in the multi-byte signed tests on big-endian. Make the checks in the multi-byte signed tests stricter. Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich --- tests/tcg/multiarch/system/memory.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/tcg/multiarch/system/memory.c b/tests/tcg/multiarch/system/memory.c index 214f7d4f54b..e29786ae559 100644 --- a/tests/tcg/multiarch/system/memory.c +++ b/tests/tcg/multiarch/system/memory.c @@ -40,18 +40,21 @@ static void pdot(int count) } /* - * Helper macros for shift/extract so we can keep our endian handling - * in one place. + * Helper macros for endian handling. */ -#define BYTE_SHIFT(b, pos) ((uint64_t)b << (pos * 8)) -#define BYTE_EXTRACT(b, pos) ((b >> (pos * 8)) & 0xff) +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ +#define BYTE_SHIFT(b, pos) (b << (pos * 8)) +#define BYTE_NEXT(b) ((b)++) +#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ +#define BYTE_SHIFT(b, pos) (b << ((sizeof(b) - 1 - (pos)) * 8)) +#define BYTE_NEXT(b) (--(b)) +#else +#error Unsupported __BYTE_ORDER__ +#endif /* - * Fill the data with ascending value bytes. - * - * Currently we only support Little Endian machines so write in - * ascending address order. When we read higher address bytes should - * either be zero or higher than the lower bytes. + * Fill the data with ascending (for little-endian) or descending (for + * big-endian) value bytes. */ static void init_test_data_u8(int unused_offset) @@ -62,14 +65,14 @@ static void init_test_data_u8(int unused_offset) ml_printf("Filling test area with u8:"); for (i = 0; i < TEST_SIZE; i++) { - *ptr++ = count++; + *ptr++ = BYTE_NEXT(count); pdot(i); } ml_printf("done\n"); } /* - * Full the data with alternating positive and negative bytes. This + * Fill the data with alternating positive and negative bytes. This * should mean for reads larger than a byte all subsequent reads will * stay either negative or positive. We never write 0. */ @@ -119,7 +122,7 @@ static void init_test_data_u16(int offset) reset_start_data(offset); for (i = 0; i < max; i++) { - uint8_t low = count++, high = count++; + uint16_t low = BYTE_NEXT(count), high = BYTE_NEXT(count); word = BYTE_SHIFT(high, 1) | BYTE_SHIFT(low, 0); *ptr++ = word; pdot(i); @@ -139,9 +142,10 @@ static void init_test_data_u32(int offset) reset_start_data(offset); for (i = 0; i < max; i++) { - uint8_t b4 = count++, b3 = count++; - uint8_t b2 = count++, b1 = count++; - word = BYTE_SHIFT(b1, 3) | BYTE_SHIFT(b2, 2) | BYTE_SHIFT(b3, 1) | b4; + uint32_t b4 = BYTE_NEXT(count), b3 = BYTE_NEXT(count); + uint32_t b2 = BYTE_NEXT(count), b1 = BYTE_NEXT(count); + word = BYTE_SHIFT(b1, 3) | BYTE_SHIFT(b2, 2) | BYTE_SHIFT(b3, 1) | + BYTE_SHIFT(b4, 0); *ptr++ = word; pdot(i); } @@ -160,13 +164,13 @@ static void init_test_data_u64(int offset) reset_start_data(offset); for (i = 0; i < max; i++) { - uint8_t b8 = count++, b7 = count++; - uint8_t b6 = count++, b5 = count++; - uint8_t b4 = count++, b3 = count++; - uint8_t b2 = count++, b1 = count++; + uint64_t b8 = BYTE_NEXT(count), b7 = BYTE_NEXT(count); + uint64_t b6 = BYTE_NEXT(count), b5 = BYTE_NEXT(count); + uint64_t b4 = BYTE_NEXT(count), b3 = BYTE_NEXT(count); + uint64_t b2 = BYTE_NEXT(count), b1 = BYTE_NEXT(count); word = BYTE_SHIFT(b1, 7) | BYTE_SHIFT(b2, 6) | BYTE_SHIFT(b3, 5) | BYTE_SHIFT(b4, 4) | BYTE_SHIFT(b5, 3) | BYTE_SHIFT(b6, 2) | - BYTE_SHIFT(b7, 1) | b8; + BYTE_SHIFT(b7, 1) | BYTE_SHIFT(b8, 0); *ptr++ = word; pdot(i); } @@ -374,12 +378,20 @@ static bool read_test_data_s16(int offset, bool neg_first) ml_printf("Reading s16 from %#lx (offset %d, %s):", ptr, offset, neg_first ? "neg" : "pos"); + /* + * If the first byte is negative, then the last byte is positive. + * Therefore the logic below must be flipped for big-endian. + */ +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ + neg_first = !neg_first; +#endif + for (i = 0; i < max; i++) { int32_t data = *ptr++; if (neg_first && data < 0) { pdot(i); - } else if (data > 0) { + } else if (!neg_first && data > 0) { pdot(i); } else { ml_printf("Error %d %c 0\n", data, neg_first ? '<' : '>'); @@ -399,12 +411,20 @@ static bool read_test_data_s32(int offset, bool neg_first) ml_printf("Reading s32 from %#lx (offset %d, %s):", ptr, offset, neg_first ? "neg" : "pos"); + /* + * If the first byte is negative, then the last byte is positive. + * Therefore the logic below must be flipped for big-endian. + */ +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__ + neg_first = !neg_first; +#endif + for (i = 0; i < max; i++) { int64_t data = *ptr++; if (neg_first && data < 0) { pdot(i); - } else if (data > 0) { + } else if (!neg_first && data > 0) { pdot(i); } else { ml_printf("Error %d %c 0\n", data, neg_first ? '<' : '>'); @@ -419,8 +439,7 @@ static bool read_test_data_s32(int offset, bool neg_first) * Read the test data and verify at various offsets * * For everything except bytes all our reads should be either positive - * or negative depending on what offset we are reading from. Currently - * we only handle LE systems. + * or negative depending on what offset we are reading from. */ read_sfn read_sfns[] = { read_test_data_s8, read_test_data_s16,