@@ -673,7 +673,16 @@ static void fuse_fallocate(fuse_req_t req, fuse_ino_t inode, int mode,
do {
int size = MIN(length, BDRV_REQUEST_MAX_BYTES);
- ret = blk_pdiscard(exp->common.blk, offset, size);
+ ret = blk_pwrite_zeroes(exp->common.blk, offset, size,
+ BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP | BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK);
+ if (ret == -ENOTSUP) {
+ /*
+ * fallocate() specifies to return EOPNOTSUPP for unsupported
+ * operations
+ */
+ ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
+
offset += size;
length -= size;
} while (ret == 0 && length > 0);
fallocate(2) says about PUNCH_HOLE: "After a successful call, subsequent reads from this range will return zeros." As it is, PUNCH_HOLE is implemented as a call to blk_pdiscard(), which does not guarantee this. We must call blk_pwrite_zeroes() instead. The difference to ZERO_RANGE is that we pass the `BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP | BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK` flags to the call -- the storage is supposed to be unmapped, and a slow fallback by actually writing zeroes as data is not allowed. Closes: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1507 Signed-off-by: Hanna Czenczek <hreitz@redhat.com> --- block/export/fuse.c | 11 ++++++++++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)