From patchwork Thu Sep 1 13:17:41 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1672887 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@legolas.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: legolas.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by legolas.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4MJM9M2CJlz1ygc for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 23:20:23 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55874 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTk7I-0006Eh-SD for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:20:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTk5Y-0005Yc-EN; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:18:34 -0400 Received: from [200.168.210.66] (port=23956 helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oTk5W-0002Uu-Dc; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 09:18:32 -0400 Received: from p9ibm ([10.10.71.235]) by outlook.eldorado.org.br over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:18:15 -0300 Received: from eldorado.org.br (unknown [10.10.70.45]) by p9ibm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E88800476; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:18:15 -0300 (-03) From: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: clg@kaod.org, danielhb413@gmail.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, groug@kaod.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br, lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br, leandro.lupori@eldorado.org.br, lucas.coutinho@eldorado.org.br Subject: [PATCH 04/19] target/ppc: Set result to QNaN for DENBCD when VXCVI occurs Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 10:17:41 -0300 Message-Id: <20220901131756.26060-5-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220901131756.26060-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> References: <20220901131756.26060-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Sep 2022 13:18:15.0916 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B8E4AC0:01D8BE05] X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 200.168.210.66 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=200.168.210.66; envelope-from=victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br; helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" According to the ISA, for instruction DENBCD: "If an invalid BCD digit or sign code is detected in the source operand, an invalid-operation exception (VXCVI) occurs." In the Invalid Operation Exception section, there is the situation: "When Invalid Operation Exception is disabled (VE=0) and Invalid Operation occurs (...) If the operation is an (...) or format the target FPR is set to a Quiet NaN". This was not being done in QEMU. This patch sets the result to QNaN when the instruction DENBCD causes an Invalid Operation Exception. Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza --- target/ppc/dfp_helper.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/dfp_helper.c b/target/ppc/dfp_helper.c index be7aa5357a..cc024316d5 100644 --- a/target/ppc/dfp_helper.c +++ b/target/ppc/dfp_helper.c @@ -1147,6 +1147,26 @@ static inline uint8_t dfp_get_bcd_digit_128(ppc_vsr_t *t, unsigned n) return t->VsrD((n & 0x10) ? 0 : 1) >> ((n << 2) & 63) & 15; } +static inline void dfp_invalid_op_vxcvi_64(struct PPC_DFP *dfp) +{ + /* TODO: fpscr is incorrectly not being saved to env */ + dfp_set_FPSCR_flag(dfp, FP_VX | FP_VXCVI, FPSCR_VE); + if ((dfp->env->fpscr & FP_VE) == 0) { + dfp->vt.VsrD(1) = 0x7c00000000000000; /* QNaN */ + } +} + + +static inline void dfp_invalid_op_vxcvi_128(struct PPC_DFP *dfp) +{ + /* TODO: fpscr is incorrectly not being saved to env */ + dfp_set_FPSCR_flag(dfp, FP_VX | FP_VXCVI, FPSCR_VE); + if ((dfp->env->fpscr & FP_VE) == 0) { + dfp->vt.VsrD(0) = 0x7c00000000000000; /* QNaN */ + dfp->vt.VsrD(1) = 0x0; + } +} + #define DFP_HELPER_ENBCD(op, size) \ void helper_##op(CPUPPCState *env, ppc_fprp_t *t, ppc_fprp_t *b, \ uint32_t s) \ @@ -1173,7 +1193,8 @@ void helper_##op(CPUPPCState *env, ppc_fprp_t *t, ppc_fprp_t *b, \ sgn = 0; \ break; \ default: \ - dfp_set_FPSCR_flag(&dfp, FP_VX | FP_VXCVI, FPSCR_VE); \ + dfp_invalid_op_vxcvi_##size(&dfp); \ + set_dfp##size(t, &dfp.vt); \ return; \ } \ } \ @@ -1183,7 +1204,8 @@ void helper_##op(CPUPPCState *env, ppc_fprp_t *t, ppc_fprp_t *b, \ digits[(size) / 4 - n] = dfp_get_bcd_digit_##size(&dfp.vb, \ offset++); \ if (digits[(size) / 4 - n] > 10) { \ - dfp_set_FPSCR_flag(&dfp, FP_VX | FP_VXCVI, FPSCR_VE); \ + dfp_invalid_op_vxcvi_##size(&dfp); \ + set_dfp##size(t, &dfp.vt); \ return; \ } else { \ nonzero |= (digits[(size) / 4 - n] > 0); \