From patchwork Wed Jun 29 16:28:54 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1650220 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LY6Py1Nvyz9s0w for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2022 02:30:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60292 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6aZv-0001eu-Uw for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:30:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6aZ4-0001cN-QU; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:29:18 -0400 Received: from [200.168.210.66] (port=33061 helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1o6aZ2-0008Gs-Qr; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 12:29:18 -0400 Received: from p9ibm ([10.10.71.235]) by outlook.eldorado.org.br over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:29:10 -0300 Received: from eldorado.org.br (unknown [10.10.70.45]) by p9ibm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A12B800502; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:29:10 -0300 (-03) From: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: clg@kaod.org, danielhb413@gmail.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, groug@kaod.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br, matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br Subject: [PATCH v3 01/11] target/ppc: Fix insn32.decode style issues Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 13:28:54 -0300 Message-Id: <20220629162904.105060-2-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220629162904.105060-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> References: <20220629162904.105060-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jun 2022 16:29:10.0573 (UTC) FILETIME=[5CA03DD0:01D88BD5] X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 200.168.210.66 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=200.168.210.66; envelope-from=victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br; helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Some lines in insn32.decode have inconsistent alignment when compared to others. Fix this by changing the alignment of some lines, making it more consistent throughout the file. Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- target/ppc/insn32.decode | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/insn32.decode b/target/ppc/insn32.decode index 6ea48d5163..8b723b5433 100644 --- a/target/ppc/insn32.decode +++ b/target/ppc/insn32.decode @@ -21,11 +21,11 @@ @A ...... frt:5 fra:5 frb:5 frc:5 ..... rc:1 &A &D rt ra si:int64_t -@D ...... rt:5 ra:5 si:s16 &D +@D ...... rt:5 ra:5 si:s16 &D &D_bf bf l:bool ra imm -@D_bfs ...... bf:3 - l:1 ra:5 imm:s16 &D_bf -@D_bfu ...... bf:3 - l:1 ra:5 imm:16 &D_bf +@D_bfs ...... bf:3 . l:1 ra:5 imm:s16 &D_bf +@D_bfu ...... bf:3 . l:1 ra:5 imm:16 &D_bf %dq_si 4:s12 !function=times_16 %dq_rtp 22:4 !function=times_2 @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ @DQ_TSXP ...... ..... ra:5 ............ .... &D si=%dq_si rt=%rt_tsxp %ds_si 2:s14 !function=times_4 -@DS ...... rt:5 ra:5 .............. .. &D si=%ds_si +@DS ...... rt:5 ra:5 .............. .. &D si=%ds_si %ds_rtp 22:4 !function=times_2 @DS_rtp ...... ....0 ra:5 .............. .. &D rt=%ds_rtp si=%ds_si @@ -49,10 +49,10 @@ &DX rt d %dx_d 6:s10 16:5 0:1 -@DX ...... rt:5 ..... .......... ..... . &DX d=%dx_d +@DX ...... rt:5 ..... .......... ..... . &DX d=%dx_d &VA vrt vra vrb rc -@VA ...... vrt:5 vra:5 vrb:5 rc:5 ...... &VA +@VA ...... vrt:5 vra:5 vrb:5 rc:5 ...... &VA &VC vrt vra vrb rc:bool @VC ...... vrt:5 vra:5 vrb:5 rc:1 .......... &VC @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ @VN ...... vrt:5 vra:5 vrb:5 .. sh:3 ...... &VN &VX vrt vra vrb -@VX ...... vrt:5 vra:5 vrb:5 .......... . &VX +@VX ...... vrt:5 vra:5 vrb:5 .......... . &VX &VX_bf bf vra vrb @VX_bf ...... bf:3 .. vra:5 vrb:5 ........... &VX_bf @@ -76,13 +76,13 @@ @VX_tb_rc ...... vrt:5 ..... vrb:5 rc:1 .......... &VX_tb_rc &VX_uim4 vrt uim vrb -@VX_uim4 ...... vrt:5 . uim:4 vrb:5 ........... &VX_uim4 +@VX_uim4 ...... vrt:5 . uim:4 vrb:5 ........... &VX_uim4 &VX_tb vrt vrb -@VX_tb ...... vrt:5 ..... vrb:5 ........... &VX_tb +@VX_tb ...... vrt:5 ..... vrb:5 ........... &VX_tb &X rt ra rb -@X ...... rt:5 ra:5 rb:5 .......... . &X +@X ...... rt:5 ra:5 rb:5 .......... . &X &X_rc rt ra rb rc:bool @X_rc ...... rt:5 ra:5 rb:5 .......... rc:1 &X_rc @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ @X_t_bp_rc ...... rt:5 ..... ....0 .......... rc:1 &X_tb_rc rb=%x_frbp &X_bi rt bi -@X_bi ...... rt:5 bi:5 ----- .......... - &X_bi +@X_bi ...... rt:5 bi:5 ..... .......... . &X_bi &X_bf bf ra rb @X_bf ...... bf:3 .. ra:5 rb:5 .......... . &X_bf @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ @X_bf_uim_bp ...... bf:3 . uim:6 ....0 .......... . &X_bf_uim rb=%x_frbp &X_bfl bf l:bool ra rb -@X_bfl ...... bf:3 - l:1 ra:5 rb:5 ..........- &X_bfl +@X_bfl ...... bf:3 . l:1 ra:5 rb:5 .......... . &X_bfl %x_xt 0:1 21:5 &X_imm5 xt imm:uint8_t vrb