| Message ID | 20220504114819.1729737-1-iii@linux.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | linux-user/host/s390: Treat EX and EXRL as writes | expand |
On 04/05/2022 13.48, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > clang-built s390x branch-relative-long test fails on clang-built s390x > QEMU due to the following sequence of events: > > - The test zeroes out a code page, clang generates exrl+xc for this. > > - do_helper_xc() is called. Clang generates exrl+xc there as well. > > - Since there already exists a TB for the code in question, its page is > read-only and SIGSEGV is raised. > > - host_signal_handler() calls host_signal_write() and the latter does > not recognize exrl as a write. Therefore page_unprotect() is not > called and the signal is forwarded to the test. > > Fix by treating EXRL (and EX, just in case) as writes. There may be > false positives, but they will lead only to an extra page_unprotect() > call. > > Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> > --- > linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) Great, this fixes the crash for me, indeed! Thank you! Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
On 5/4/22 04:48, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > clang-built s390x branch-relative-long test fails on clang-built s390x > QEMU due to the following sequence of events: > > - The test zeroes out a code page, clang generates exrl+xc for this. > > - do_helper_xc() is called. Clang generates exrl+xc there as well. > > - Since there already exists a TB for the code in question, its page is > read-only and SIGSEGV is raised. > > - host_signal_handler() calls host_signal_write() and the latter does > not recognize exrl as a write. Therefore page_unprotect() is not > called and the signal is forwarded to the test. > > Fix by treating EXRL (and EX, just in case) as writes. There may be > false positives, but they will lead only to an extra page_unprotect() > call. > > Reported-by: Thomas Huth<thuth@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich<iii@linux.ibm.com> > --- > linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
Le 04/05/2022 à 13:48, Ilya Leoshkevich a écrit : > clang-built s390x branch-relative-long test fails on clang-built s390x > QEMU due to the following sequence of events: > > - The test zeroes out a code page, clang generates exrl+xc for this. > > - do_helper_xc() is called. Clang generates exrl+xc there as well. > > - Since there already exists a TB for the code in question, its page is > read-only and SIGSEGV is raised. > > - host_signal_handler() calls host_signal_write() and the latter does > not recognize exrl as a write. Therefore page_unprotect() is not > called and the signal is forwarded to the test. > > Fix by treating EXRL (and EX, just in case) as writes. There may be > false positives, but they will lead only to an extra page_unprotect() > call. > > Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> > --- > linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h b/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h > index 6f191e64d7..25fefa00bd 100644 > --- a/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h > +++ b/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static inline bool host_signal_write(siginfo_t *info, host_sigcontext *uc) > case 0x50: /* ST */ > case 0x42: /* STC */ > case 0x40: /* STH */ > + case 0x44: /* EX */ > case 0xba: /* CS */ > case 0xbb: /* CDS */ > return true; > @@ -61,6 +62,12 @@ static inline bool host_signal_write(siginfo_t *info, host_sigcontext *uc) > return true; > } > break; > + case 0xc6: /* RIL-b format insns */ > + switch (pinsn[0] & 0xf) { > + case 0x0: /* EXRL */ > + return true; > + } > + break; > case 0xc8: /* SSF format insns */ > switch (pinsn[0] & 0xf) { > case 0x2: /* CSST */ Applied to my linux-user-for-7.1 branch. Thanks, Laurent
diff --git a/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h b/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h index 6f191e64d7..25fefa00bd 100644 --- a/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h +++ b/linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static inline bool host_signal_write(siginfo_t *info, host_sigcontext *uc) case 0x50: /* ST */ case 0x42: /* STC */ case 0x40: /* STH */ + case 0x44: /* EX */ case 0xba: /* CS */ case 0xbb: /* CDS */ return true; @@ -61,6 +62,12 @@ static inline bool host_signal_write(siginfo_t *info, host_sigcontext *uc) return true; } break; + case 0xc6: /* RIL-b format insns */ + switch (pinsn[0] & 0xf) { + case 0x0: /* EXRL */ + return true; + } + break; case 0xc8: /* SSF format insns */ switch (pinsn[0] & 0xf) { case 0x2: /* CSST */
clang-built s390x branch-relative-long test fails on clang-built s390x QEMU due to the following sequence of events: - The test zeroes out a code page, clang generates exrl+xc for this. - do_helper_xc() is called. Clang generates exrl+xc there as well. - Since there already exists a TB for the code in question, its page is read-only and SIGSEGV is raised. - host_signal_handler() calls host_signal_write() and the latter does not recognize exrl as a write. Therefore page_unprotect() is not called and the signal is forwarded to the test. Fix by treating EXRL (and EX, just in case) as writes. There may be false positives, but they will lead only to an extra page_unprotect() call. Reported-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)