From patchwork Tue May 3 20:24:24 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= X-Patchwork-Id: 1625974 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KtDsc04N7z9sCq for ; Wed, 4 May 2022 08:19:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60358 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nm0rx-0007i7-OT for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 18:19:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47098) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlz61-0004cH-DY; Tue, 03 May 2022 16:26:09 -0400 Received: from [187.72.171.209] (port=28036 helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlz5z-0005g5-RH; Tue, 03 May 2022 16:26:09 -0400 Received: from p9ibm ([10.10.71.235]) by outlook.eldorado.org.br over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.5.9600.16384); Tue, 3 May 2022 17:25:36 -0300 Received: from eldorado.org.br (unknown [10.10.70.45]) by p9ibm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B355F801109; Tue, 3 May 2022 17:25:35 -0300 (-03) From: =?utf-8?q?V=C3=ADctor_Colombo?= To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org Cc: clg@kaod.org, danielhb413@gmail.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au, groug@kaod.org, richard.henderson@linaro.org, balaton@eik.bme.hu, victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br Subject: [PATCH v3 04/21] target/ppc: Remove msr_le macro Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 17:24:24 -0300 Message-Id: <20220503202441.129549-5-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220503202441.129549-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> References: <20220503202441.129549-1-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2022 20:25:36.0085 (UTC) FILETIME=[F24DD850:01D85F2B] X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 187.72.171.209 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=187.72.171.209; envelope-from=victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br; helo=outlook.eldorado.org.br X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" msr_le macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr as a parameter. Suggested-by: Richard Henderson Signed-off-by: VĂ­ctor Colombo Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson --- target/ppc/cpu.h | 2 +- target/ppc/cpu_init.c | 2 +- target/ppc/gdbstub.c | 2 +- target/ppc/mem_helper.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h index 21d1f14381..932c5f4bdd 100644 --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h @@ -355,6 +355,7 @@ typedef enum { #define MSR_LE 0 /* Little-endian mode 1 hflags */ FIELD(MSR, PR, MSR_PR, 1) +FIELD(MSR, LE, MSR_LE, 1) /* PMU bits */ #define MMCR0_FC PPC_BIT(32) /* Freeze Counters */ @@ -485,7 +486,6 @@ FIELD(MSR, PR, MSR_PR, 1) #define msr_ir ((env->msr >> MSR_IR) & 1) #define msr_dr ((env->msr >> MSR_DR) & 1) #define msr_ds ((env->msr >> MSR_DS) & 1) -#define msr_le ((env->msr >> MSR_LE) & 1) #define msr_ts ((env->msr >> MSR_TS1) & 3) #define DBCR0_ICMP (1 << 27) diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c index ac16a64846..0c6b83406e 100644 --- a/target/ppc/cpu_init.c +++ b/target/ppc/cpu_init.c @@ -7210,7 +7210,7 @@ static bool ppc_cpu_is_big_endian(CPUState *cs) cpu_synchronize_state(cs); - return !msr_le; + return !FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE); } #ifdef CONFIG_TCG diff --git a/target/ppc/gdbstub.c b/target/ppc/gdbstub.c index 1252429a2a..1a0b9ca82c 100644 --- a/target/ppc/gdbstub.c +++ b/target/ppc/gdbstub.c @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int ppc_gdb_register_len(int n) void ppc_maybe_bswap_register(CPUPPCState *env, uint8_t *mem_buf, int len) { #ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY - if (!msr_le) { + if (!FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE)) { /* do nothing */ } else if (len == 4) { bswap32s((uint32_t *)mem_buf); diff --git a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c index fba7f84b7a..9af135e88e 100644 --- a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c +++ b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ static inline bool needs_byteswap(const CPUPPCState *env) { #if TARGET_BIG_ENDIAN - return msr_le; + return FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE); #else - return !msr_le; + return !FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE); #endif } @@ -470,8 +470,8 @@ uint32_t helper_stqcx_be_parallel(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, #endif /* - * We use msr_le to determine index ordering in a vector. However, - * byteswapping is not simply controlled by msr_le. We also need to + * We use MSR_LE to determine index ordering in a vector. However, + * byteswapping is not simply controlled by MSR_LE. We also need to * take into account endianness of the target. This is done for the * little-endian PPC64 user-mode target. */ @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ uint32_t helper_stqcx_be_parallel(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, int adjust = HI_IDX * (n_elems - 1); \ int sh = sizeof(r->element[0]) >> 1; \ int index = (addr & 0xf) >> sh; \ - if (msr_le) { \ + if (FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE)) { \ index = n_elems - index - 1; \ } \ \ @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ LVE(lvewx, cpu_ldl_data_ra, bswap32, u32) int adjust = HI_IDX * (n_elems - 1); \ int sh = sizeof(r->element[0]) >> 1; \ int index = (addr & 0xf) >> sh; \ - if (msr_le) { \ + if (FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE)) { \ index = n_elems - index - 1; \ } \ \ @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ void helper_##name(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, \ t.s128 = int128_zero(); \ if (nb) { \ nb = (nb >= 16) ? 16 : nb; \ - if (msr_le && !lj) { \ + if (FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE) && !lj) { \ for (i = 16; i > 16 - nb; i--) { \ t.VsrB(i - 1) = cpu_ldub_data_ra(env, addr, GETPC()); \ addr = addr_add(env, addr, 1); \ @@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ void helper_##name(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, \ } \ \ nb = (nb >= 16) ? 16 : nb; \ - if (msr_le && !lj) { \ + if (FIELD_EX64(env->msr, MSR, LE) && !lj) { \ for (i = 16; i > 16 - nb; i--) { \ cpu_stb_data_ra(env, addr, xt->VsrB(i - 1), GETPC()); \ addr = addr_add(env, addr, 1); \