From patchwork Fri Dec 3 14:27:03 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matthew Rosato X-Patchwork-Id: 1563284 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: bilbo.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=rGqrrnmI; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J5FZ35jgpz9sR4 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 01:28:59 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57326 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mt9YX-0006Ws-JU for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:28:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50512) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mt9Wz-0005zH-Ps; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:27:21 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:21192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mt9Wx-0004pj-Pq; Fri, 03 Dec 2021 09:27:21 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1B3CmZ4B002410; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:17 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=6RpY75ZP3cCWRNfgc+A/YuYK4UkB5oOiEZCyKfk0RFs=; b=rGqrrnmICAAjJ3BtFMy1c4GiFd7WB+s3cLlmhF+2M12jbquyyGviqVyxrBTi64TLX7Lf R6hok+TIZG1kiaD7dXBcXnzYjUarvGjKEHiUsdNVAfb+upsIYjyG76QGwr8I89vVA3wa lW74y3irfhJxxfPDbBtZFqINk6kvOcJtALNhI/NK6TBsOINft4esbUDWP2S1bbP3zAVp fXUyhV9v7x+SbhIyb6L55b48IHL8CCcv20AWtD3WLHw5T418i1r4Bu0lIWD757qyRqQd 0kQR2GGyf2IN0hvYlmjFcOP39WjcaIiEhZqtF//3T1qexiit66AL7wmxQ8vxtfZ+e3CY 8A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cqkjra6s2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Dec 2021 14:27:16 +0000 Received: from m0098404.ppops.net (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 1B3Dmxi6029451; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:16 GMT Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3cqkjra6rk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Dec 2021 14:27:16 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 1B3ENUdo014985; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:15 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3ckcad59uc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 03 Dec 2021 14:27:15 +0000 Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.232]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 1B3ERDlN24183394 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:13 GMT Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12216E059; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8E56E052; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-c92d2ccc-254b-11b2-a85c-a700b5bfb098.ibm.com.com (unknown [9.211.96.25]) by b03ledav001.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:27:12 +0000 (GMT) From: Matthew Rosato To: thuth@redhat.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] s390x/pci: use a reserved ID for the default PCI group Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 09:27:03 -0500 Message-Id: <20211203142706.427279-2-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20211203142706.427279-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> References: <20211203142706.427279-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 51hAod69tCt_5L81yl_z07jWVzavonxl X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: uB1WREr8Eb4BOaD_HNGcHtB91ACTk5i6 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.790,Hydra:6.0.425,FMLib:17.11.62.513 definitions=2021-12-03_07,2021-12-02_01,2021-12-02_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2110150000 definitions=main-2112030088 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: farman@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" The current default PCI group being used can technically collide with a real group ID passed from a hostdev. Let's instead use a group ID that comes from a special pool (0xF0-0xFF) that is architected to be reserved for simulated devices. Fixes: 28dc86a072 ("s390x/pci: use a PCI Group structure") Reviewed-by: Eric Farman Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato --- include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h index aa891c178d..2727e7bdef 100644 --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ typedef struct ZpciFmb { } ZpciFmb; QEMU_BUILD_BUG_MSG(offsetof(ZpciFmb, fmt0) != 48, "padding in ZpciFmb"); -#define ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP 0x20 +#define ZPCI_DEFAULT_FN_GRP 0xFF typedef struct S390PCIGroup { ClpRspQueryPciGrp zpci_group; int id;