From patchwork Wed Sep 29 02:58:06 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "wangyanan (Y)" X-Patchwork-Id: 1534185 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HK1Pw1gh4z9svs for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 13:02:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50672 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVPrV-0001Bk-UV for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 23:02:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60764) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVPo5-0005SL-2w; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 22:58:53 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:3146) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mVPo2-00061q-6H; Tue, 28 Sep 2021 22:58:52 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.54]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4HK1DJ3y42z8ywc; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:54:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:58:35 +0800 Received: from DESKTOP-TMVL5KK.china.huawei.com (10.174.187.128) by dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.8; Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:58:34 +0800 From: Yanan Wang To: Eduardo Habkost , Paolo Bonzini , =?utf-8?q?Daniel_P_=2E_Berrang=C3=A9?= , Andrew Jones , =?utf-8?q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , "Markus Armbruster" Subject: [PATCH v12 06/16] machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:58:06 +0800 Message-ID: <20210929025816.21076-7-wangyanan55@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.4.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20210929025816.21076-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> References: <20210929025816.21076-1-wangyanan55@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.249.212.188; envelope-from=wangyanan55@huawei.com; helo=szxga02-in.huawei.com X-Spam_score_int: -22 X-Spam_score: -2.3 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.3 / 5.0 requ) RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Maydell , Pierre Morel , Pankaj Gupta , Cornelia Huck , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Yanan Wang , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Michael S . Tsirkin" , wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, David Gibson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We have two requirements for a valid SMP configuration: the product of "sockets * cores * threads" must represent all the possible cpus, i.e., max_cpus, and then must include the initially present cpus, i.e., smp_cpus. So we only need to ensure 1) "sockets * cores * threads == maxcpus" at first and then ensure 2) "maxcpus >= cpus". With a reasonable order of the sanity check, we can simplify the error reporting code. When reporting an error message we also report the exact value of each topology member to make users easily see what's going on. Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé --- hw/core/machine.c | 22 +++++++++------------- hw/i386/pc.c | 24 ++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c index d8f458db60..e38ab760e6 100644 --- a/hw/core/machine.c +++ b/hw/core/machine.c @@ -782,25 +782,21 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp) maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * cores * threads; cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus; - if (sockets * cores * threads < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: " - "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < " - "smp_cpus (%u)", - sockets, cores, threads, cpus); + if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) { + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " + "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " + "!= maxcpus (%u)", + sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus); return; } if (maxcpus < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp"); - return; - } - - if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) { error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " "sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " - "!= maxcpus (%u)", - sockets, cores, threads, - maxcpus); + "== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)", + sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus); return; } diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c index d9382b7d57..a37eef8057 100644 --- a/hw/i386/pc.c +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c @@ -749,25 +749,21 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * dies * cores * threads; cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus; - if (sockets * dies * cores * threads < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: " - "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < " - "smp_cpus (%u)", - sockets, dies, cores, threads, cpus); + if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) { + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: " + "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " + "!= maxcpus (%u)", + sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus); return; } if (maxcpus < cpus) { - error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp"); - return; - } - - if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) { - error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology deprecated: " + error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: " + "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: " "sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) " - "!= maxcpus (%u)", - sockets, dies, cores, threads, - maxcpus); + "== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)", + sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus); return; }