Message ID | 20210922045636.25206-10-imp@bsdimp.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | bsd-user mmap fixes | expand |
On 9/21/21 9:56 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > Similar to the equivalent linux-user change 86abac06c14. All error > conditions that target_mprotect checks are also checked by target_mmap. > EACCESS cannot happen because we are just removing PROT_WRITE. ENOMEM > should not happen because we are modifying a whole VMA (and we have > bigger problems anyway if it happens). > > Fixes a Coverity false positive, where Coverity complains about > target_mprotect's return value being passed to tb_invalidate_phys_range. > > Signed-off-by: Mikaël Urankar<mikael.urankar@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Warner Losh<imp@bsdimp.com> > --- > bsd-user/mmap.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
On 9/22/21 06:56, Warner Losh wrote: > Similar to the equivalent linux-user change 86abac06c14. All error > conditions that target_mprotect checks are also checked by target_mmap. > EACCESS cannot happen because we are just removing PROT_WRITE. ENOMEM > should not happen because we are modifying a whole VMA (and we have > bigger problems anyway if it happens). > > Fixes a Coverity false positive, where Coverity complains about > target_mprotect's return value being passed to tb_invalidate_phys_range. > > Signed-off-by: Mikaël Urankar <mikael.urankar@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> > --- > bsd-user/mmap.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
diff --git a/bsd-user/mmap.c b/bsd-user/mmap.c index 792ff00548..4ddbd50b62 100644 --- a/bsd-user/mmap.c +++ b/bsd-user/mmap.c @@ -591,10 +591,7 @@ abi_long target_mmap(abi_ulong start, abi_ulong len, int prot, goto fail; if (!(prot & PROT_WRITE)) { ret = target_mprotect(start, len, prot); - if (ret != 0) { - start = ret; - goto the_end; - } + assert(ret == 0); } goto the_end; }