From patchwork Wed Sep 15 17:52:50 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hanna Czenczek X-Patchwork-Id: 1528498 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=TgLHxRh1; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H8nzQ2QMcz9sXk for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2021 03:59:30 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60574 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQZBw-0000ZF-3A for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:59:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51516) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQZ6H-0005pX-Cl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:53:37 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:43620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mQZ6D-0006Rw-Kl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:53:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631728412; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=xEmsIsVZJ1b5hOCrP/lM8Zro4QPWjantR9Q31P7XTqs=; b=TgLHxRh1Hxa6SOo3WJBjAKV2Dsqn8zxek8EvPrxCRydGd1wkseGIJNC6Ijwmusk2K8AzBl mAH15ZUOq6uMytWku/oIFnH5y2gR7X7FEXlunUbeHdRcpMf71B8E54OAmxJc+TTkb37hZU l+rgB0ijQ80MG6cgkS3u83BwnB5tla8= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-227-Di7TYAicO26HA0Kz2FFSLQ-1; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:53:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Di7TYAicO26HA0Kz2FFSLQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C96F684A5E0; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.39.192.101]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7202D5D9D3; Wed, 15 Sep 2021 17:53:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Hanna Reitz To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 04/32] block: Clarify that @bytes is no limit on *pnum Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:52:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20210915175318.853225-5-hreitz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210915175318.853225-1-hreitz@redhat.com> References: <20210915175318.853225-1-hreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=hreitz@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=hreitz@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.39, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , Hanna Reitz , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" .bdrv_co_block_status() implementations are free to return a *pnum that exceeds @bytes, because bdrv_co_block_status() in block/io.c will clamp *pnum as necessary. On the other hand, if drivers' implementations return values for *pnum that are as large as possible, our recently introduced block-status cache will become more effective. So, make a note in block_int.h that @bytes is no upper limit for *pnum. Suggested-by: Eric Blake Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Message-Id: <20210812084148.14458-4-hreitz@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake --- include/block/block_int.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/block/block_int.h b/include/block/block_int.h index 437d746733..5451f89b8d 100644 --- a/include/block/block_int.h +++ b/include/block/block_int.h @@ -348,6 +348,15 @@ struct BlockDriver { * clamped to bdrv_getlength() and aligned to request_alignment, * as well as non-NULL pnum, map, and file; in turn, the driver * must return an error or set pnum to an aligned non-zero value. + * + * Note that @bytes is just a hint on how big of a region the + * caller wants to inspect. It is not a limit on *pnum. + * Implementations are free to return larger values of *pnum if + * doing so does not incur a performance penalty. + * + * block/io.c's bdrv_co_block_status() will utilize an unclamped + * *pnum value for the block-status cache on protocol nodes, prior + * to clamping *pnum for return to its caller. */ int coroutine_fn (*bdrv_co_block_status)(BlockDriverState *bs, bool want_zero, int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, int64_t *pnum,