From patchwork Mon May 10 08:59:36 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito X-Patchwork-Id: 1476241 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=CoWJRVnX; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fdw5W5VHHz9sWq for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 19:01:19 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47794 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg1mv-0003ao-4h for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 05:01:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg1lc-0003B2-CJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 04:59:56 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:35339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lg1la-0005da-Sc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 May 2021 04:59:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1620637194; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=71j0q2fNtlHCJ9PQYUaCJ1Q3f0+hrP1j+qWjuLpkOUc=; b=CoWJRVnXCS5/G+L30olcacE6xDuoSZ3kQmja/nCCW3U6vFmnCxup/y4CGvBFscxiQyst0R 7olBpoooml5Xq9rHVnXayNlvII7hJq+yIq0rsoczuIToRYNetK93FE4l6xbqmFVCRfJTei pBO8p0GRZ1peluUGT++nys9/u17k9PM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-564-_-JSVOsHMaOQd1RyDFzDuw-1; Mon, 10 May 2021 04:59:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _-JSVOsHMaOQd1RyDFzDuw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 488A8801107; Mon, 10 May 2021 08:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (ovpn-113-184.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.184]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D876267D; Mon, 10 May 2021 08:59:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ratelimit: treat zero speed as unlimited Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 10:59:36 +0200 Message-Id: <20210510085941.22769-2-eesposit@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210510085941.22769-1-eesposit@redhat.com> References: <20210510085941.22769-1-eesposit@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=eesposit@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.133.124; envelope-from=eesposit@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.699, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito , Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini , John Snow Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Paolo Bonzini Both users of RateLimit, block-copy.c and blockjob.c, treat a speed of zero as unlimited, while RateLimit treats it as "as slow as possible". The latter is nicer from the code point of view but pretty useless, so disable rate limiting if a speed of zero is provided. Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy --- include/qemu/ratelimit.h | 12 ++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/qemu/ratelimit.h b/include/qemu/ratelimit.h index 003ea6d5a3..48bf59e857 100644 --- a/include/qemu/ratelimit.h +++ b/include/qemu/ratelimit.h @@ -43,7 +43,11 @@ static inline int64_t ratelimit_calculate_delay(RateLimit *limit, uint64_t n) double delay_slices; QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&limit->lock); - assert(limit->slice_quota && limit->slice_ns); + if (!limit->slice_quota) { + /* Throttling disabled. */ + return 0; + } + assert(limit->slice_ns); if (limit->slice_end_time < now) { /* Previous, possibly extended, time slice finished; reset the @@ -83,7 +87,11 @@ static inline void ratelimit_set_speed(RateLimit *limit, uint64_t speed, { QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&limit->lock); limit->slice_ns = slice_ns; - limit->slice_quota = MAX(((double)speed * slice_ns) / 1000000000ULL, 1); + if (speed == 0) { + limit->slice_quota = 0; + } else { + limit->slice_quota = MAX(((double)speed * slice_ns) / 1000000000ULL, 1); + } } #endif