Message ID | 20190503112654.4393-1-laurent@vivier.eu |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Ping ? On 03/05/2019 13:26, Laurent Vivier wrote: > The following changes since commit 8482ff2eb3bb95020eb2f370a9b3ea26511e41df: > > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/jnsnow/tags/bitmaps-pull-request' into staging (2019-05-02 12:04:51 +0100) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://github.com/vivier/qemu.git tags/trivial-branch-pull-request > > for you to fetch changes up to 2d2023c3b99edb33ad4bb9791f70456ea1a1c049: > > sockets: avoid string truncation warnings when copying UNIX path (2019-05-03 13:03:04 +0200) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Pull request trivial branch 2019-05-03 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Aruna Jayasena (1): > Header cleanups > > Daniel P. Berrangé (1): > sockets: avoid string truncation warnings when copying UNIX path > > Dr. David Alan Gilbert (1): > configure: fix pam test warning > > Marc-André Lureau (1): > doc: fix the configuration path > > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (3): > hw/net/pcnet: Use qemu_log_mask(GUEST_ERROR) instead of printf > Makefile: Let the 'clean' rule remove qemu-ga.exe on Windows hosts > hw/sparc/leon3: Allow load of uImage firmwares > > Stefan Weil (1): > Update configure > > Thomas Huth (1): > net: Print output of "-net nic, model=help" to stdout instead of > stderr > > Wei Yang (3): > CODING_STYLE: specify the indent rule for multiline code > CODING_STYLE: indent example code as all others > qom: use object_new_with_type in object_new_with_propv > > qemu-ga.texi | 4 ++-- > configure | 5 ++--- > Makefile | 11 +++++---- > include/exec/cpu-common.h | 3 --- > hw/net/pcnet.c | 4 +++- > hw/sparc/leon3.c | 4 ++++ > net/net.c | 7 +++--- > qom/object.c | 2 +- > util/qemu-sockets.c | 12 ++++++---- > CODING_STYLE | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 10 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 20:10, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote: > > Ping ? This is in my queue to process, but there are still a bunch of other pullreqs in the queue too; I am working through them. thanks -- PMM
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 21:48, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 20:10, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote: > > > > Ping ? > > This is in my queue to process, but there are still a bunch of > other pullreqs in the queue too; I am working through them. Wait, I'm confused now. Looking back through my emails you said "Forget this series, the send has been aborted for an unknown reason.". So should I be applying something ? thanks -- PMM
On 09/05/2019 10:51, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 21:48, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 20:10, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote: >>> >>> Ping ? >> >> This is in my queue to process, but there are still a bunch of >> other pullreqs in the queue too; I am working through them. > > Wait, I'm confused now. Looking back through my emails you > said "Forget this series, the send has been aborted for an > unknown reason.". So should I be applying something ? Yes, it's why I pinged. I sent the v2 three times because the sent was aborted for an known reason two times. The third is the good one. You must apply this series. I can send a v3 if your prefer. Thanks, Laurent
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 09:58, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote: > > On 09/05/2019 10:51, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 21:48, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 20:10, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote: > >>> > >>> Ping ? > >> > >> This is in my queue to process, but there are still a bunch of > >> other pullreqs in the queue too; I am working through them. > > > > Wait, I'm confused now. Looking back through my emails you > > said "Forget this series, the send has been aborted for an > > unknown reason.". So should I be applying something ? > > Yes, it's why I pinged. > > I sent the v2 three times because the sent was aborted for an known > reason two times. The third is the good one. > > You must apply this series. Applied, thanks. -- PMM