Message ID | 20170918160012.4317-9-david@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | s390x: SMP for TCG (+ cleanups) | expand |
On 09/18/2017 08:59 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Going to OPERATING here looks wrong. A CPU should even never be > !OPERATING at this point. Unhalting will already be done in > cpu_handle_halt() if there is work, so we can drop this statement > completely. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> > --- > target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> r~
diff --git a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c index ff257ba72e..4dc30e056a 100644 --- a/target/s390x/excp_helper.c +++ b/target/s390x/excp_helper.c @@ -432,7 +432,6 @@ void s390_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs) qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "%s: %d at pc=%" PRIx64 "\n", __func__, cs->exception_index, env->psw.addr); - s390_cpu_set_state(CPU_STATE_OPERATING, cpu); /* handle machine checks */ if ((env->psw.mask & PSW_MASK_MCHECK) && (cs->exception_index == -1)) {
Going to OPERATING here looks wrong. A CPU should even never be !OPERATING at this point. Unhalting will already be done in cpu_handle_halt() if there is work, so we can drop this statement completely. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> --- target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)