From patchwork Wed Jun 28 18:56:32 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alex Williamson X-Patchwork-Id: 781850 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3wyX8c48V2z9s7g for ; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 04:57:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35225 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQI98-0002Ei-7j for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:57:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38859) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQI8n-0002EQ-VE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:56:42 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQI8j-0005Vz-5C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:56:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57960) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQI8i-0005Vf-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:56:37 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC0E8C057EC9 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:56:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com CC0E8C057EC9 Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx08.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alex.williamson@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com CC0E8C057EC9 Received: from gimli.home (ovpn-116-91.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.91]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC40756A4; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:56:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Alex Williamson To: alex.williamson@redhat.com Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:56:32 -0600 Message-ID: <20170628185546.4469.87645.stgit@gimli.home> User-Agent: StGit/0.17.1-dirty MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:56:35 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vfio/pci: Fixup v0 PCIe capabilities X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" Intel 82599 VFs report a PCIe capability version of 0, which is invalid. The earliest version of the PCIe spec used version 1. This causes Windows to fail startup on the device and it will be disabled with error code 10. Our choices are either to drop the PCIe cap on such devices, which has the side effect of likely preventing the guest from discovering any extended capabilities, or performing a fixup to update the capability to the earliest valid version. This implements the latter. Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson --- hw/vfio/pci.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c index 32aca7770177..3346f89f98c2 100644 --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c @@ -1743,6 +1743,18 @@ static int vfio_setup_pcie_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, int pos, uint8_t size, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_MLW | PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS); } + /* + * Intel 82599 SR-IOV VFs report an invalid PCIe capability version 0 + * (Niantic errate #35) causing Windows to error with a Code 10 for the + * device on Q35. Fixup any such devices to report version 1. If we + * were to remove the capability entirely the guest would lose extended + * config space. + */ + if ((flags & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS) == 0) { + vfio_add_emulated_word(vdev, pos + PCI_CAP_FLAGS, + 1, PCI_EXP_FLAGS_VERS); + } + pos = pci_add_capability(&vdev->pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP, pos, size); if (pos >= 0) { vdev->pdev.exp.exp_cap = pos;