From patchwork Thu Jun 22 11:26:48 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Laurent Vivier X-Patchwork-Id: 779443 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3wtfSg5HrYz9sNV for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:27:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO0Gn-0002Zv-HY for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:27:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56216) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO0GJ-0002Zo-OU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:27:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO0GG-0000H1-JW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:26:59 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dO0GG-0000Gp-D4; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 07:26:56 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7177F419; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:26:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 1F7177F419 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lvivier@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 1F7177F419 Received: from thinkpad.redhat.com (ovpn-116-225.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.225]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3767765F; Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:26:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Laurent Vivier To: David Gibson Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:26:48 +0200 Message-Id: <20170622112648.24815-1-lvivier@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 11:26:54 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/ppc/cpu-models: set POWER9_v1.0 as POWER9 DD1 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Laurent Vivier , Thomas Huth , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1 is 0x004E0100, so this is the POWER9 v1.0. When we run qemu on a POWER9 DD1 host, we must use either "-cpu host" or "-cpu POWER9", but in the latter case it fails with Unable to find sPAPR CPU Core definition because POWER9 DD1 doesn't appear in the list of known CPUs. This patch fixes this by defining POWER9_v1.0 with POWER9 DD1 PVR instead of CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE. Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth --- target/ppc/cpu-models.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu-models.c b/target/ppc/cpu-models.c index 4d3e635..a22363c 100644 --- a/target/ppc/cpu-models.c +++ b/target/ppc/cpu-models.c @@ -1144,7 +1144,7 @@ POWERPC_DEF("970_v2.2", CPU_POWERPC_970_v22, 970, "PowerPC 970 v2.2") - POWERPC_DEF("POWER9_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_BASE, POWER9, + POWERPC_DEF("POWER9_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1, POWER9, "POWER9 v1.0") POWERPC_DEF("970fx_v1.0", CPU_POWERPC_970FX_v10, 970,