From patchwork Thu May 11 12:32:46 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Maxime Coquelin X-Patchwork-Id: 761053 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3wNszs6pxLz9ryr for ; Thu, 11 May 2017 22:36:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nKh-0004m3-FA for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 08:36:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55363) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nHq-0002lm-EL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 08:33:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nHp-0004yp-3h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 08:33:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8nHo-0004yE-RU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 08:33:41 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A3980C22; Thu, 11 May 2017 12:33:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com E3A3980C22 Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx02.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com E3A3980C22 Received: from localhost.localdomain (ovpn-112-16.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.16]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0878D546; Thu, 11 May 2017 12:33:36 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxime Coquelin To: mst@redhat.com, peterx@redhat.com, marcandre.lureau@gmail.com, vkaplans@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com, yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jfreiman@redhat.com Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 14:32:46 +0200 Message-Id: <20170511123246.31308-7-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20170511123246.31308-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> References: <20170511123246.31308-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.26]); Thu, 11 May 2017 12:33:40 +0000 (UTC) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 209.132.183.28 Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] spec/vhost-user spec: Add IOMMU support X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Maxime Coquelin Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This patch specifies and implements the master/slave communication to support device IOTLB in slave. The vhost_iotlb_msg structure introduced for kernel backends is re-used, making the design close between the two backends. An exception is the use of the secondary channel to enable the slave to send IOTLB miss requests to the master. Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin --- docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt index 5fa7016..4a1f0c3 100644 --- a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt +++ b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt @@ -97,6 +97,23 @@ Depending on the request type, payload can be: log offset: offset from start of supplied file descriptor where logging starts (i.e. where guest address 0 would be logged) + * An IOTLB message + --------------------------------------------------------- + | iova | size | user address | permissions flags | type | + --------------------------------------------------------- + + IOVA: a 64-bit guest I/O virtual address + Size: a 64-bit size + User address: a 64-bit user address + Permissions flags: a 8-bit bit field: + - Bit 0: Read access + - Bit 1: Write access + Type: a 8-bit IOTLB message type: + - 1: IOTLB miss + - 2: IOTLB update + - 3: IOTLB invalidate + - 4: IOTLB access fail + In QEMU the vhost-user message is implemented with the following struct: typedef struct VhostUserMsg { @@ -109,6 +126,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg { struct vhost_vring_addr addr; VhostUserMemory memory; VhostUserLog log; + struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb; }; } QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg; @@ -253,6 +271,31 @@ Once the source has finished migration, rings will be stopped by the source. No further update must be done before rings are restarted. +IOMMU support +------------- + +When the VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature has been negotiated, the master has +to send IOTLB entries update & invalidation by sending VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG +requests to the slave with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg payload. For update events, +the iotlb payload has to be filled with the update message type (2), the I/O +virtual address, the size, the user virtual address, and the permissions +flags. For invalidation events, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the +invalidation message type (3), the I/O virtual address and the size. On +success, the slave is expected to reply with a zero payload, non-zero +otherwise. + +When the VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SLAVE_REQ is supported by the slave, and the +master initiated the slave to master communication channel using the +VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD request, the slave can send IOTLB miss and access +failure events by sending VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG requests to the master +with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg payload. For miss events, the iotlb payload has +to be filled with the miss message type (1), the I/O virtual address and the +permissions flags. For access failure event, the iotlb payload has to be +filled with the access failure message type (4), the I/O virtual address and +the permissions flags. For synchronization purpose, the slave may rely on the +reply-ack feature, so the master may send a reply when operation is completed +if the reply-ack feature is negotiated and slaves requests a reply. + Slave communication ------------------- @@ -514,6 +557,38 @@ Master message types If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated, slave must respond with zero for success, non-zero otherwise. + * VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG + + Id: 22 + Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type) + Master payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg + Slave payload: u64 + + Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload. + Master sends such requests to update and invalidate entries in the device + IOTLB. The slave has to acknowledge the request with sending zero as u64 + payload for success, non-zero otherwise. + This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature + has been successfully negotiated. + +Slave message types +------------------- + + * VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG + + Id: 1 + Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type) + Slave payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg + Master payload: N/A + + Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload. + Slave sends such requests to notify of an IOTLB miss, or an IOTLB + access failure. If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated, + and slave set the VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY flag, master must respond with + zero when operation is successfully completed, or non-zero otherwise. + This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature + has been successfully negotiated. + VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK: ------------------------------- The original vhost-user specification only demands replies for certain diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c index fbc09fa..2c93181 100644 --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c @@ -63,11 +63,13 @@ typedef enum VhostUserRequest { VHOST_USER_SEND_RARP = 19, VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU = 20, VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD = 21, + VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG = 22, VHOST_USER_MAX } VhostUserRequest; typedef enum VhostUserSlaveRequest { VHOST_USER_SLAVE_NONE = 0, + VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG = 1, VHOST_USER_SLAVE_MAX } VhostUserSlaveRequest; @@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg { struct vhost_vring_addr addr; VhostUserMemory memory; VhostUserLog log; + struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb; } payload; } QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg; @@ -611,6 +614,9 @@ static void slave_read(void *opaque) } switch (msg.request) { + case VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG: + ret = vhost_backend_handle_iotlb_msg(dev, &msg.payload.iotlb); + break; default: error_report("Received unexpected msg type."); ret = -EINVAL; @@ -858,6 +864,29 @@ static int vhost_user_net_set_mtu(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu) return 0; } +static int vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev, + struct vhost_iotlb_msg *imsg) +{ + VhostUserMsg msg = { + .request = VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG, + .size = sizeof(msg.payload.iotlb), + .flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION | VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK, + .payload.iotlb = *imsg, + }; + + if (vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0) < 0) { + return -EFAULT; + } + + return process_message_reply(dev, msg.request); +} + + +static void vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback(struct vhost_dev *dev, int enabled) +{ + /* No-op as the receive channel is not dedicated to IOTLB messages. */ +} + const VhostOps user_ops = { .backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER, .vhost_backend_init = vhost_user_init, @@ -882,4 +911,6 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = { .vhost_migration_done = vhost_user_migration_done, .vhost_backend_can_merge = vhost_user_can_merge, .vhost_net_set_mtu = vhost_user_net_set_mtu, + .vhost_set_iotlb_callback = vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback, + .vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg = vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg, };