From patchwork Tue Jan 19 20:44:13 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Matthew Rosato X-Patchwork-Id: 1428853 Return-Path: X-Original-To: incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org Delivered-To: patchwork-incoming@bilbo.ozlabs.org Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=nongnu.org (client-ip=209.51.188.17; helo=lists.gnu.org; envelope-from=qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=qahj7GB5; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DL16m3LMrz9sVS for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 07:52:00 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38226 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1xyo-0008N3-4D for incoming@patchwork.ozlabs.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:51:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1xrp-0002h3-Mx; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:44:45 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:33432) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1xrn-0002R9-Ga; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:44:45 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10JKVVLZ042475; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:44:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references; s=pp1; bh=UN4iGXiNFl5YtKdz36uIRyYgj8OuTqVvi59P1XeP7qE=; b=qahj7GB5g0JsgXT24FOa2WiSxSLOvu3Dqcbbqoz/Mp07VZnBpQVi5CDBXgvgYdWTcJ5S VLK6n/HQ1gkQfoYdQFpGYKrxuOR0edB2Q9PN5wTjkFxu/DUMr078hV3fzHRsmxPJkwdJ xQUhI6zXS5iTRzXLL8b0xrfMiJP1LwNknyp05ZNmGuUztuja39tRyaW2+siOfbSWYNhE BHBnyk+WUkn+dJr2CSF2GndKNluP4kXEAAjF1fpb1UtAVAU4x+13JRFA6XLmmkhjWglJ mKuuwrtXMCRQs/0QsUVS1k7122bbUiWkFczD7aNiwdv3mCQik0Tdq7KuGGwuPYNbXjU/ PQ== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3665eh1srh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:44:40 -0500 Received: from m0187473.ppops.net (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 10JKW3xW044134; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:44:37 -0500 Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 3665eh1sn8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:44:36 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10JKaPvs030721; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:44:29 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.18]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 363qs974j5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:44:28 +0000 Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.233]) by b03cxnp08026.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 10JKiR1L27918754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:44:27 GMT Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB95136055; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:44:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BDD136051; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:44:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc4221205838.ibm.com (unknown [9.211.56.144]) by b03ledav002.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 20:44:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Matthew Rosato To: cohuck@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH 2/8] s390x/pci: Keep track of the PCI Function type Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:44:13 -0500 Message-Id: <1611089059-6468-3-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1611089059-6468-1-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> References: <1611089059-6468-1-git-send-email-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-19_09:2021-01-18, 2021-01-19 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101190110 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=148.163.156.1; envelope-from=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com X-Spam_score_int: -26 X-Spam_score: -2.7 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, schnelle@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pasic@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+incoming=patchwork.ozlabs.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" We now receive the hardware identification of the PCI Function type through vfio. While we can't yet forward that to a guest via CLP, we can still use this to make device-type-dependent decisions in QEMU. Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato --- hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c | 1 + include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c index ead4f22..cb59e98 100644 --- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c +++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-vfio.c @@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ static void s390_pci_read_base(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, /* The following values remain 0 until we support other FMB formats */ pbdev->zpci_fn.fmbl = 0; pbdev->zpci_fn.pft = 0; + pbdev->pft = cap->pft; } static void s390_pci_read_group(S390PCIBusDevice *pbdev, diff --git a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h index 49ae9f0..0662e7b 100644 --- a/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h +++ b/include/hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h @@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ struct S390PCIBusDevice { uint16_t noi; uint16_t maxstbl; uint8_t sum; + uint8_t pft; S390PCIGroup *pci_group; ClpRspQueryPci zpci_fn; S390MsixInfo msix;