Message ID | 1445761408-10308-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Sorry, I just find that maybe I should cc this patch to qemu-trivial@nongnu.org On 10/25/2015 04:23 PM, Cao jin wrote: > bad indentation conflicts with CODING_STYLE doc > > Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > hw/pci/pcie.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c > index 6e28985..e4bfe91 100644 > --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > @@ -413,13 +413,13 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_write_config(PCIDevice *dev, > */ > if ((sltsta & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS) && (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC) && > ((val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF) == PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF)) { > - PCIBus *sec_bus = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev)); > - pci_for_each_device(sec_bus, pci_bus_num(sec_bus), > - pcie_unplug_device, NULL); > + PCIBus *sec_bus = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev)); > + pci_for_each_device(sec_bus, pci_bus_num(sec_bus), > + pcie_unplug_device, NULL); > > - pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > - PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS); > - pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > + pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS); > + pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC); > } > >
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 08:07:34PM +0800, Cao jin wrote: > Sorry, I just find that maybe I should cc this patch to > qemu-trivial@nongnu.org Indeed. > On 10/25/2015 04:23 PM, Cao jin wrote: > >bad indentation conflicts with CODING_STYLE doc > > > >Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > >--- > > hw/pci/pcie.c | 12 ++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c > >index 6e28985..e4bfe91 100644 > >--- a/hw/pci/pcie.c > >+++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c > >@@ -413,13 +413,13 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_write_config(PCIDevice *dev, > > */ > > if ((sltsta & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS) && (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC) && > > ((val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF) == PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF)) { > >- PCIBus *sec_bus = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev)); > >- pci_for_each_device(sec_bus, pci_bus_num(sec_bus), > >- pcie_unplug_device, NULL); > >+ PCIBus *sec_bus = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev)); > >+ pci_for_each_device(sec_bus, pci_bus_num(sec_bus), > >+ pcie_unplug_device, NULL); > > > >- pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > >- PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS); > >- pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > >+ pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > >+ PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS); > >+ pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, > > PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC); > > } > > > > > > -- > Yours Sincerely, > > Cao Jin
25.10.2015 11:23, Cao jin wrote:
> bad indentation conflicts with CODING_STYLE doc
I don't like patches which just change coding style.
It is often agreed that when you fix some code you
can also fix indentation of surrounding code, but
just fixing coding style isn't very productive.
Yet I'm applying this one. Maybe it is the last
case like this.. ;)
Thanks,
/mjt
Thanks Michael. and I am sorry if it bothered you. Maybe it can be avoid to have a clear definition of "trivial" to direct the newbies like me:P On 10/29/2015 03:45 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 25.10.2015 11:23, Cao jin wrote: >> bad indentation conflicts with CODING_STYLE doc > > I don't like patches which just change coding style. > It is often agreed that when you fix some code you > can also fix indentation of surrounding code, but > just fixing coding style isn't very productive. > > Yet I'm applying this one. Maybe it is the last > case like this.. ;) > > Thanks, > > /mjt >
29.10.2015 10:57, Cao jin wrote: > Thanks Michael. and I am sorry if it bothered you. There's nothing to worry about, really. > Maybe it can be avoid to have a clear definition of "trivial" to direct the newbies like me:P It is a general common sense maybe, I dunno. There's lot of code which does not comply with the coding styles, and at the very least, when you change just that without actually changing the code, git blame stops working, showing your non- change for everything instead of showing actual _code_ changes. That's one of the reasons why all qemu codebase hasn't been translated by some automatic coding style formatting tool. Thanks, /mjt
On 10/29/2015 04:07 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > It is a general common sense maybe, I dunno. There's lot of code which does not > comply with the coding styles, and at the very least, when you change just that > without actually changing the code, git blame stops working, showing your non- > change for everything instead of showing actual _code_ changes. That's one of > the reasons why all qemu codebase hasn't been translated by some automatic > coding style formatting tool. > I see. Thanks for sharing the thing about "git blame", I do not know this before:) > Thanks, > > /mjt >
diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c index 6e28985..e4bfe91 100644 --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c @@ -413,13 +413,13 @@ void pcie_cap_slot_write_config(PCIDevice *dev, */ if ((sltsta & PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS) && (val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PCC) && ((val & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF) == PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PIC_OFF)) { - PCIBus *sec_bus = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev)); - pci_for_each_device(sec_bus, pci_bus_num(sec_bus), - pcie_unplug_device, NULL); + PCIBus *sec_bus = pci_bridge_get_sec_bus(PCI_BRIDGE(dev)); + pci_for_each_device(sec_bus, pci_bus_num(sec_bus), + pcie_unplug_device, NULL); - pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, - PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS); - pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, + pci_word_test_and_clear_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDS); + pci_word_test_and_set_mask(exp_cap + PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC); }
bad indentation conflicts with CODING_STYLE doc Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- hw/pci/pcie.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)