Message ID | 1331655771-10868-1-git-send-email-mjt@msgid.tls.msk.ru |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > [Sorry - sent the wrong patch, should have been > BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, not BDRV_BLOCK_SIZE....] > > block.c:find_image_format() calls bdrv_pread() to read first 2048 > bytes from the device to guess its format. This function can use > bdrv_read() directly since the the read is done on sector boundary. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> > --- > block.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block.c b/block.c > index b88ee90..b3af1f6 100644 > --- a/block.c > +++ b/block.c > @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int find_image_format(const char *filename, BlockDriver **pdrv) > return ret; > } > > - ret = bdrv_pread(bs, 0, buf, sizeof(buf)); > + ret = bdrv_read(bs, 0, buf, sizeof(buf) / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE); Why do this? The code is nicer to read without the sector division and there's no real difference at execution time. Stefan
diff --git a/block.c b/block.c index b88ee90..b3af1f6 100644 --- a/block.c +++ b/block.c @@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ static int find_image_format(const char *filename, BlockDriver **pdrv) return ret; } - ret = bdrv_pread(bs, 0, buf, sizeof(buf)); + ret = bdrv_read(bs, 0, buf, sizeof(buf) / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE); bdrv_delete(bs); if (ret < 0) { *pdrv = NULL;
[Sorry - sent the wrong patch, should have been BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, not BDRV_BLOCK_SIZE....] block.c:find_image_format() calls bdrv_pread() to read first 2048 bytes from the device to guess its format. This function can use bdrv_read() directly since the the read is done on sector boundary. Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> --- block.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)