@@ -1545,6 +1545,8 @@ static void display_refresh(struct DisplayState *ds)
{
if (qxl0->mode == QXL_MODE_VGA) {
qemu_spice_display_refresh(&qxl0->ssd);
+ } else {
+ qemu_spice_cursor_refresh_unlocked(&qxl0->ssd);
}
}
@@ -317,16 +317,8 @@ void qemu_spice_display_resize(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd)
ssd->notify++;
}
-void qemu_spice_display_refresh(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd)
+void qemu_spice_cursor_refresh_unlocked(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd)
{
- dprint(3, "%s:\n", __FUNCTION__);
- vga_hw_update();
-
- qemu_mutex_lock(&ssd->lock);
- if (ssd->update == NULL) {
- ssd->update = qemu_spice_create_update(ssd);
- ssd->notify++;
- }
if (ssd->cursor) {
ssd->ds->cursor_define(ssd->cursor);
cursor_put(ssd->cursor);
@@ -337,6 +329,19 @@ void qemu_spice_display_refresh(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd)
ssd->mouse_x = -1;
ssd->mouse_y = -1;
}
+}
+
+void qemu_spice_display_refresh(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd)
+{
+ dprint(3, "%s:\n", __func__);
+ vga_hw_update();
+
+ qemu_mutex_lock(&ssd->lock);
+ if (ssd->update == NULL) {
+ ssd->update = qemu_spice_create_update(ssd);
+ ssd->notify++;
+ }
+ qemu_spice_cursor_refresh_unlocked(ssd);
qemu_mutex_unlock(&ssd->lock);
if (ssd->notify) {
@@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ void qemu_spice_display_update(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd,
int x, int y, int w, int h);
void qemu_spice_display_resize(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd);
void qemu_spice_display_refresh(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd);
+void qemu_spice_cursor_refresh_unlocked(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd);
void qemu_spice_add_memslot(SimpleSpiceDisplay *ssd, QXLDevMemSlot *memslot,
qxl_async_io async);
regression introduced by 075360945860ad9bdd491921954b383bf762b0e5, Reported-by: Fabiano FidĂȘncio <fabiano@fidencio.org> Signed-off-by: Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com> --- Thanks for the report, this fixes the problem for me, the problem with reverting the commit you proposed is that it would reintroduce dropping of the global mutex in spice code. hw/qxl.c | 2 ++ ui/spice-display.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- ui/spice-display.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)