Message ID | 1311190818-4793-1-git-send-email-weil@mail.berlios.de |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Hi Stefan W., Am 20.07.2011 um 21:40 schrieb Stefan Weil: > cppcheck report: > > darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: Unused variable: i > darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: > Variable 'err' is assigned a value that is never used Does this really bug you? I'm a bit skeptical towards trying to fix warnings in code that doesn't compile either way... (or does it by now?) Andreas > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> > --- > darwin-user/signal.c | 1 - > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/darwin-user/signal.c b/darwin-user/signal.c > index e2adca3..c530227 100644 > --- a/darwin-user/signal.c > +++ b/darwin-user/signal.c > @@ -319,7 +319,6 @@ static void setup_frame(int sig, struct > emulated_sigaction *ka, > void *set, CPUState *env) > { > void *frame; > - int i, err = 0; > > fprintf(stderr, "setup_frame %d\n", sig); > frame = get_sigframe(ka, env, sizeof(*frame)); > -- > 1.7.2.5 > >
Am 22.07.2011 22:48, schrieb Andreas Färber: > Hi Stefan W., > > Am 20.07.2011 um 21:40 schrieb Stefan Weil: > >> cppcheck report: >> >> darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: Unused variable: i >> darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: >> Variable 'err' is assigned a value that is never used > > Does this really bug you? I'm a bit skeptical towards trying to fix > warnings in code that doesn't compile either way... (or does it by now?) > > Andreas Hi Andreas, the warnings were the result of a static code inspection with a program called cppcheck. I don't compile darwin code, so I did not notice that the code does not compile. Is there a good reason to keep those two unused variables? Fixing the issue helps with static code analysis because unnecessary manual code checks can be avoided. Cheers, Stefan
Thanks, applied. On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> wrote: > Am 22.07.2011 22:48, schrieb Andreas Färber: >> >> Hi Stefan W., >> >> Am 20.07.2011 um 21:40 schrieb Stefan Weil: >> >>> cppcheck report: >>> >>> darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: Unused variable: i >>> darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: >>> Variable 'err' is assigned a value that is never used >> >> Does this really bug you? I'm a bit skeptical towards trying to fix >> warnings in code that doesn't compile either way... (or does it by now?) >> >> Andreas > > Hi Andreas, > > the warnings were the result of a static code inspection with > a program called cppcheck. I don't compile darwin code, > so I did not notice that the code does not compile. > > Is there a good reason to keep those two unused variables? > Fixing the issue helps with static code analysis because > unnecessary manual code checks can be avoided. > > Cheers, > Stefan > > >
diff --git a/darwin-user/signal.c b/darwin-user/signal.c index e2adca3..c530227 100644 --- a/darwin-user/signal.c +++ b/darwin-user/signal.c @@ -319,7 +319,6 @@ static void setup_frame(int sig, struct emulated_sigaction *ka, void *set, CPUState *env) { void *frame; - int i, err = 0; fprintf(stderr, "setup_frame %d\n", sig); frame = get_sigframe(ka, env, sizeof(*frame));
cppcheck report: darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: Unused variable: i darwin-user/signal.c:322: style: Variable 'err' is assigned a value that is never used Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de> --- darwin-user/signal.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)