@@ -734,6 +734,7 @@ typedef struct CPUX86State {
uint32_t sipi_vector;
uint32_t cpuid_kvm_features;
uint32_t cpuid_svm_features;
+ bool tsc_valid;
/* in order to simplify APIC support, we leave this pointer to the
user */
@@ -301,6 +301,15 @@ void kvm_inject_x86_mce(CPUState *cenv, int bank, uint64_t status,
#endif
}
+static void cpu_update_state(void *opaque, int running, int reason)
+{
+ CPUState *env = opaque;
+
+ if (running) {
+ env->tsc_valid = false;
+ }
+}
+
int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *env)
{
struct {
@@ -434,6 +443,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vcpu(CPUState *env)
}
#endif
+ qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(cpu_update_state, env);
+
return kvm_vcpu_ioctl(env, KVM_SET_CPUID2, &cpuid_data);
}
@@ -1061,7 +1072,12 @@ static int kvm_get_msrs(CPUState *env)
if (has_msr_hsave_pa) {
msrs[n++].index = MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA;
}
- msrs[n++].index = MSR_IA32_TSC;
+
+ if (!env->tsc_valid) {
+ msrs[n++].index = MSR_IA32_TSC;
+ env->tsc_valid = !vm_running;
+ }
+
#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
if (lm_capable_kernel) {
msrs[n++].index = MSR_CSTAR;
If the machine is stopped, we should not record two different tsc values upon a save operation. The same problem happens with kvmclock. But kvmclock is taking a different diretion, being now seen as a separate device. Since this is unlikely to happen with the tsc, I am taking the approach here of simply registering a handler for state change, and using a per-CPUState variable that prevents double updates for the TSC. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com> CC: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> --- v2: updated tsc validation logic, as asked by Jan v3: regenerated against uq/master --- target-i386/cpu.h | 1 + target-i386/kvm.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)