Message ID | 1275270181-10992-1-git-send-email-nab@linux-iscsi.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Am 31.05.2010 03:43, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger: > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> > > This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT and PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN > case in scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into SCSIRequest->cmd.xfer, > and adds a second PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode() in order to properly > set SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV for WRITE data. > > Tested with Linux KVM guests and Megasas 8708EM2 HBA emulation and TCM_Loop target ports. > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> > --- > hw/scsi-bus.c | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c > index b8e4b71..75ec74e 100644 > --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c > +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c > @@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ static int scsi_req_length(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *cmd) > case INQUIRY: > req->cmd.xfer = cmd[4] | (cmd[3] << 8); > break; > + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT: > + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN: > + req->cmd.xfer = cmd[8] | (cmd[7] << 8); Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't exactly the same value set in the switch block above? (for cmd[0] >> 5 == 2) Kevin
Am 04.06.2010 16:06, schrieb Kevin Wolf: > Am 31.05.2010 03:43, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger: >> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> >> >> This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT and PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN >> case in scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into SCSIRequest->cmd.xfer, >> and adds a second PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode() in order to properly >> set SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV for WRITE data. >> >> Tested with Linux KVM guests and Megasas 8708EM2 HBA emulation and TCM_Loop target ports. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> >> --- >> hw/scsi-bus.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c >> index b8e4b71..75ec74e 100644 >> --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c >> +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c >> @@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ static int scsi_req_length(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *cmd) >> case INQUIRY: >> req->cmd.xfer = cmd[4] | (cmd[3] << 8); >> break; >> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT: >> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN: >> + req->cmd.xfer = cmd[8] | (cmd[7] << 8); > > Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't exactly the same value set in the > switch block above? (for cmd[0] >> 5 == 2) Nicholas? This isn't applied yet because I'm waiting for your answer. Is there a reason why it makes sense to do it explicitly here instead using the generic code a few lines above? I think the same applied to patch 2/2. Kevin
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:13 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 04.06.2010 16:06, schrieb Kevin Wolf: > > Am 31.05.2010 03:43, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger: > >> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> > >> > >> This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT and PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN > >> case in scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into SCSIRequest->cmd.xfer, > >> and adds a second PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode() in order to properly > >> set SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV for WRITE data. > >> > >> Tested with Linux KVM guests and Megasas 8708EM2 HBA emulation and TCM_Loop target ports. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> > >> --- > >> hw/scsi-bus.c | 5 +++++ > >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c > >> index b8e4b71..75ec74e 100644 > >> --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c > >> +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c > >> @@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ static int scsi_req_length(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *cmd) > >> case INQUIRY: > >> req->cmd.xfer = cmd[4] | (cmd[3] << 8); > >> break; > >> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT: > >> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN: > >> + req->cmd.xfer = cmd[8] | (cmd[7] << 8); > > > > Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't exactly the same value set in the > > switch block above? (for cmd[0] >> 5 == 2) > > Nicholas? This isn't applied yet because I'm waiting for your answer. > > Is there a reason why it makes sense to do it explicitly here instead > using the generic code a few lines above? I think the same applied to > patch 2/2. Hi Kevin, I just tested this again and you are correct, the reassignment of req->cmd.xfer for PR and Maintence CDBs is unnecessary in scsi_req_length(). I will go ahead and drop part this from my tree. Please let me know if you would like me to resend the patch series. Best, --nab
Am 16.06.2010 15:03, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger: > On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 14:13 +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 04.06.2010 16:06, schrieb Kevin Wolf: >>> Am 31.05.2010 03:43, schrieb Nicholas A. Bellinger: >>>> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> >>>> >>>> This patch updates hw/scsi-bus.c to add PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT and PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN >>>> case in scsi_req_length() to extra the incoming buffer length into SCSIRequest->cmd.xfer, >>>> and adds a second PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT case in scsi_req_xfer_mode() in order to properly >>>> set SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV for WRITE data. >>>> >>>> Tested with Linux KVM guests and Megasas 8708EM2 HBA emulation and TCM_Loop target ports. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> >>>> --- >>>> hw/scsi-bus.c | 5 +++++ >>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c >>>> index b8e4b71..75ec74e 100644 >>>> --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c >>>> +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c >>>> @@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ static int scsi_req_length(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *cmd) >>>> case INQUIRY: >>>> req->cmd.xfer = cmd[4] | (cmd[3] << 8); >>>> break; >>>> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT: >>>> + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN: >>>> + req->cmd.xfer = cmd[8] | (cmd[7] << 8); >>> >>> Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't exactly the same value set in the >>> switch block above? (for cmd[0] >> 5 == 2) >> >> Nicholas? This isn't applied yet because I'm waiting for your answer. >> >> Is there a reason why it makes sense to do it explicitly here instead >> using the generic code a few lines above? I think the same applied to >> patch 2/2. > > Hi Kevin, > > I just tested this again and you are correct, the reassignment of > req->cmd.xfer for PR and Maintence CDBs is unnecessary in > scsi_req_length(). I will go ahead and drop part this from my tree. > > Please let me know if you would like me to resend the patch series. Sure, taking simpler code is always better, so I'd be happier with a v2. Kevin
diff --git a/hw/scsi-bus.c b/hw/scsi-bus.c index b8e4b71..75ec74e 100644 --- a/hw/scsi-bus.c +++ b/hw/scsi-bus.c @@ -325,6 +325,10 @@ static int scsi_req_length(SCSIRequest *req, uint8_t *cmd) case INQUIRY: req->cmd.xfer = cmd[4] | (cmd[3] << 8); break; + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT: + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_IN: + req->cmd.xfer = cmd[8] | (cmd[7] << 8); + break; } return 0; } @@ -389,6 +393,7 @@ static void scsi_req_xfer_mode(SCSIRequest *req) case MEDIUM_SCAN: case SEND_VOLUME_TAG: case WRITE_LONG_2: + case PERSISTENT_RESERVE_OUT: req->cmd.mode = SCSI_XFER_TO_DEV; break; default: